|
WSWS : Arts
Review : Film
Reviews
A look at rural life in British Ceylon
Sudu Sevaneli, directed by Sunil Ariyarathne
By Panini Wijesiriwardana and Nilwala de Silva
10 February 2003
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
Sudu Sevaneli (White Shadows), a historical drama directed
by Sunil Ariyarathne and based on Piyadasa Welikannages
award winning novel of the same name, was recently screened at
the Fukuoka International Film Festival in Japan.
Ariyarathnes film is set in mid-19th century British
Ceylon against the backdrop of the Matale Karalle peasant-based
rebellion and its aftermath. The revolt, which was directed against
British land-grabbing policies and repressive taxes, erupted in
Sri Lankas central province in July 1848. The short-lived
rebellion, which called for an end to colonial rule and a return
of the local feudal monarchy, was brutally crushed by British
forces. Up to 200 peasants were killed and many more arrested
and imprisoned.
Sudubanda (Roshan Pilapitiya), the films chief protagonist,
is a Buddhist priest who joins the uprising. Following its defeat
he flees to Colombo and becomes an apprentice carpenter. After
nine years he decides to return home and establish a workshop.
On arrival, he discovers his family in disarray. His mother is
not well and appears to have become insane. Her house is disintegrating
and Sudubandas brother Heenbanda (Linton Semage) has been
jailed for murdering the Korale (local administrators appointed
by the British). Heenbandas wife, Podi Menike (Wasanthi
Chathurani), and her son and daughter are living a hand-to-mouth
existence in their village.
Sudubanda, who is an efficient and skilled tradesman, repairs
his mothers house and with hard work provides for the whole
family. One day he and Menike visit Heenbanda in prison. During
the visit, Heenbanda gives permission for his beautiful wife to
live with Sudubanda. Until recently, two brothers living together
with a single wife was an accepted marriage custom in Sri Lankas
central hill area. The practice, known as eka gei kema,
was not uncommon among the landed gentry and used to ensure property
remained within the family.
On the way back home, Menike and Sudubanda reveal their affection
for each other and begin living together. Construction of a Christian
church and school in the area provides work for Sudubanda. He
establishes friendly relations with the local priest and gives
permission for Menikes son to attend the church school.
Several years later, on the 30th anniversary of Queen Victorias
rule, Heenbanda is given a state pardon and released from jail.
Although his return home should be an occasion for celebration,
he feels like an outsider. His wife is pregnant to Sudubanda,
Heenbanda feels alienated from his children and Christian missionaries
are educating his only son. He is angry, confused and disappointed.
Sudubanda is also thrown off balance. He becomes dissatisfied
with the new arrangements in the family home and visits a former
fiancé, hoping to renew their old relationship, only to
learn that she is already married.
Meanwhile, Menike gives birth, but the child is stillborn.
In fact, the baby died because of Heenbandas drunken sexual
abuse of his wife in the last weeks of her pregnancy. This tragic
loss is another blow to Sudubanda, who has neglected his carpentry
business and is losing customers. Sudu Sevaneli concludes
with the infants funeral.
Historical background
Sudu Sevaneli is a serious work and the first film in
12 years by director Ariyarathne, a University of Sri Jayawardanepura
senior lecturer, well-known lyricist, and literature and music
researcher. It is important, however, to examine whether he has
done justice to the films central historical themesthe
rebellion and the complex social changes that followed in its
wake.
Britain took control of Ceylon in 1815 and used the existing
feudal relations to profit from the countrys cheap labour
and raw materials. In the 1840s, however, the colonial administration
began introducing new methods of exploitation.
Legal ownership of land (rather than verbal transfer agreements),
the sale of wasteland and other measures were introduced
to allow acquisition of land for the developing coffee, tea and
rubber plantation industry. This further weakened the feudal landlords
and impacted heavily on the Buddhist hierarchy, which had large
tracts of land, and the peasantry. In 1848, following a collapse
of international coffee and cinnamon prices, the colonial government
imposed direct taxes on a range of items, including roads, shops,
guns, carts and livestock.
The social deprivations created by these measures gave rise
to the Matale Karalle rebellion, which erupted in the central
districts of Kandy, Matale and Kurunegala.
Although the rebellion leadersPuran Appu and Gongale
Godabandawere not members of the feudal elite in Kandy,
capital of Sri Lankas last kingdom, they reflected its political
aspirations. The Buddhist clergy gave them monarchical status
and local monks joined the movement. The rebels attacked government
buildings, destroying tax records, and in late July 1848 prepared
to recapture Kandy from the British.
Viscount Torrington, the British governor of Ceylon, declared
marshal law and the revolt was suppressed by British forces within
a few weeks, opening the way for an even broader expansion of
large-scale plantations and a transformation in social relations
throughout the entire country. While the peasantry and elements
of the embryonic working class supported the revolt, the anti-colonial
movement could not be advanced through a program that called for
a return to feudal social relations.
Sudu Sevaneli effectively portrays the limited methods
and perspective of the rebels and the changes in social life after
the revolt. In fact, the character of Sudubanda vividly encapsulates
this change. From Buddhist monk to carpenter and then workshop
owner, he symbolises a new generation: independent from inherited
property and the old feudal relations and unwilling to submit
to the local Korale.
When reminded that his carpentry shop is on the Korales
land, Sudubanda declares that he will establish his own place.
Nor does he want to live with his brothers wife unless it
is a genuinely loving and free relationship. When Heenbanda is
released from prison, Sudubanda attempts to establish a new married
life of his own.
Sudubanda, however, is a contradictory character, sandwiched
between the values of the old feudal system and the new economic
relations. The new social order has provided him with a liberal
outlook but his previous training as a Buddhist monk and the consequent
renunciation of earthly pleasures, tends to constrain him emotionally.
One-sided approach
Ariyarathne attempts to demonstrate that the missionary education
alienated children from their parents and other family members.
But this approach is one-sided. It also leaves the door open for
an accommodation to backward looking nationalist elements that
hanker for a return to the old lifestyle and the so-called superior,
moralistic Sinhala-Buddhist culture.
British rule was brutal, but the plantation economy was accompanied
by limited infrastructure development, including the construction
of roads, which began to breakdown Ceylons regional isolation.
Although these changes were arbitrarily and ruthlessly imposed
on the poverty-stricken masses, they set in motion a transformation
that undermined the backward feudal family relations and created
the conditions for a relatively enlightened lifestyle among sections
of the local population. The missionary education, which was introduced
a few decades before the revolt, also contributed to this transformation.
In the novel, Heenbanda and Menike have two sons studying at
the mission school. One becomes a civil servant and the other
a Christian priest. While Heenbanda is happy to see his children
learning English and enjoying English culture, he feels separated
from them. Ariyarathne, unfortunately, only shows Heenbandas
suffering. This does not ring true and is further compounded by
the directors decision to omit the civil servant son from
the movie.
In the original story, this boy helps to expose the essential
role of the colonial education system, which was to produce an
educated English-speaking layer to run the British-controlled
administration. Children unable to go on to higher education were
absorbed into the government sectors as postmasters, stationmasters,
clerks and other white-collar jobs.
Sudu Sevaneli, however, only shows children learning
the bible. But missionary schools taught a range of subjectsEnglish,
Mathematics, Latin, Literature, History, Geography and Musicexposing
sections of the population to a wider world outside the old and
narrow Buddhist-based education.
According to Ariyarathne, the local population was hoodwinked
into attending missionary schools. In fact, the newly emerging
native bourgeoisie took advantage of this new education system
and voluntarily enrolled their children in the mission schools.
Visually Sudu Sevaneli is limited. Filmed in cinemascope,
the full potential of the medium is not realised and the sets
and costumes fail to accurately represent the period.
Despite these weaknesses, Ariyarathnes film has many
compelling moments with strong performances from the leading actors.
The relationship between the grandmother and the little boy, Heenbandas
remorse over the death of the child and the meeting between Sudubanda
and his former fiancé are beautifully portrayed.
Sudubanda and Menikes complex relationship is also effective
and convincing, as is the dramatisation of Heenbandas difficulties
and frustrations. One scene after Heenbandas return home
and his rough sexual treatment of Menike is particularly poignant.
Sudubanda comforts Menike by applying ointment to her scratched
shoulder. While there is little dialogue, this is an extraordinarily
sensitive and emotional moment.
Compared to most local films, which rarely deal with historical
themes and then only skim the surface, Sudu Sevaneli is
a serious and occasionally perceptive exploration of 19th century
rural life. It signifies a small but healthy improvement in the
general standard of Sri Lankan filmmaking.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |