|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Middle
East : Turkey
War plans against Iraq aggravate conflict over Cyprus
By Justus Leicht
24 January 2003
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
During the past weeks, tens of thousands of Turkish Cypriots
have demonstrated for reunification with the Greek part of the
island and for accession to the European Union (EU). These mass
demonstrations were directed against Rauf Denktash, the president
of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC),
who has blocked the proposals by the United Nations (UN) to end
the division of the island. Only Turkey recognizes the TRNC.
Last weeks demonstration was attended by 50,000 to 70,000
people, which is about one third of the population living in the
Turkish part of the island. A counter-demonstration in support
of Denktash drew no more than 300 participants.
These figures underscore the fact that Turkish nationalism,
which dominated the North of the country for nearly 30 years,
has lost almost all support.
The division of Cyprus began with the invasion of Turkish troops
in 1974. One third of the populationGreeks as well as Turkswere
forced to leave their homes. The island, where a Greek majority
and a Turkish minority had previously coexisted peacefully, was
divided up into two separate ethnically cleansed areas.
The Turkish invasion took place in reaction to a coup by fanatical
Greek nationalists. With the support of the military junta governing
in Athens, they had overthrown President Makarios, a moderate
Greek nationalist, and replaced him with the notorious terrorist
Nicos Sampson.
Since the Turkish invasion, the issue of Cyprus has served
right-wing politicians and military officers in both Athens and
Ankara as a welcome pretext to whip up nationalist sentiments.
However, economic developments have undermined the influence of
this type of nationalism. The recent demonstrations are an expression
of social discontent that has accumulated over a long period.
Despite the fact that the Turkish part of Cyprus encompasses
about one third of the island, including two thirds of all arable
land, the difference in living standards between the internationally
recognized Greek South and the internationally ostracized Turkish
North has continually widened to the latters disadvantage.
In the South, average income per capita is three times as high
as in the North. Since the 1970s, more than 10,000 Turkish Cypriots
have left the North. In the past, right-wing settlers from the
Turkish mainland took their place. Many Turkish workers are crossing
the Greek border every day, in order to earn some money in Southern
Cyprus. While the economy in the South experienced a boom due
to international subsidies and tourism, all that boomed in the
North was inflation and money laundering, and the Turkish population
sank into poverty.
The recent decision by the European Union to accept (Southern)
Cyprus as a new member threatens to deepen the social divide between
the two parts of the island.
Resistance by the Turkish military
After its election victory in Turkey last November, the AKP
(Party for Justice and Development) led by Recep Tayip Erdogan
promised a new policy. The Cyprus conflict was to be resolved
in order to hasten negotiations on Turkeys own accession
to the EU. In December, the EU decided to accept Cyprus as a full
member in 2004, and the UN presented a new plan to overcome the
division of the island.
However, Denktash, with the support of the Turkish army leadership,
has since blocked this plan. While the Turkish population of Cyprus
is protesting against Denktash in the streets, and Erdogan has
been warning that the will of the people must not be ignored,
high-ranking military figures came out with several statements
in the Turkish media declaring that the UN plan for Cyprus posed
a threat to Turkeys security interests.
The Turkish military is clinging to Northern Cyprus for ideological,
economic and strategic reasons.
Ideologically, they justify their extraordinary power within
the state by claiming that they uphold the heritage of the founder
of the Turkish state, Kemal Atatürk. Any retreat in relation
to Cyprus would deal a heavy blow to this nationalist myth.
Economically, the occupation and division of the island creates
a lucrative source of income for members of the military as well
as for the criminal fascist gangs, the Gray Wolves, which constitute
a key pillar of Denktashs regime. It has been an open secret
for a long time that the money laundered in the numerous banks
and casinos in Northern Cyprus comes from drug dealing and is
used to finance the dirty war against the Kurdish minority in
Turkey.
Following the de facto capitulation of the Kurdish nationalist
movement, the PKK, even sections of the military regard the mafia
structures that developed within the army during the 15 years
of war against the Kurds as an obstacle to Turkeys economic
development. Still, the strategic importance of Cyprus has gained
even greater significance for them.
At present, Northern Cyprus is a virtual military protectorate,
inhabited by 200,000 civilians and 35,000 soldiers. The troops
sent over from the Turkish mainland control most of the public
administration, including the police and the fire brigades. The
island is the largest military base in the eastern Mediterranean
Ocean. The oil pipeline from Baku to Ceyhanconstruction
of which has just begunwill end just opposite of Cyprus
on the Turkish Mediterranean coast. In addition, Cyprus is situated
on the sea route between Turkey and her ally Israel (while the
land route passes through Syria).
The role of the US
The Turkish military leaders feel strengthened by the US war
plans. Turkey is to serve as an important base for the war against
Iraq. Washington demands that Ankara permit the deployment of
large military units that will form a northern front against Iraq.
Media reports have spoken of the Pentagon stationing 80,000 US
soldiers in Turkey as well as its use of eight Turkish air bases
and three civilian ports.
So far, the AKP government has been hesitant about fully complying
with these requests. While the Turkish government depends on the
US for cash and credits, it still fears the reaction of the public.
According to recent polls, 80 to 90 per cent of Turks are opposed
to a war against their neighboring country.
This is why the US government is turning more and more directly
to the Turkish military. On Monday, US Chief of Staff Richard
Myers visited Ankara for a two-hour talk with his Turkish counterpart,
Hilmi Özkök. Afterwards, he praised the close strategic
collaboration between the two nations.
For public consumption, the army leadership is leaving the
decision on Turkeys position regarding the war to the government.
According to a report by the American press agency UPI, however,
they are proceeding quite differently behind the scenes: Ozkok
has just held his own tricky meeting with Prime Minister Abdullah
Gul, and reports from sources close to the military tell UPI the
general informed the premier that news reports about indecision
regarding the Iraq issue had upset the Turkish armed forces.
The Turkish generals are keen to support the United States, claiming
that since Washington has clearly decided to go ahead, Turkey
had better be on the winning side to ensure that it has a major
voice in post-war decisions on the future of Iraq and the role
of the Kurds.
In the New York Times of 16 January 2003, columnist
William Safire was most explicit in spelling out Washingtons
attitude towards Turkey, a stance marked by cynicism and imperialist
arrogance. Having praised Turkey as a long-standing reliable ally
of the US, Safire complained that ...the growth of democracy
in Turkey... has introduced an element of uncertainty in that
alliance. The new, freely elected government in Ankara, with roots
more Islamic than secular, is waffling about joining President
Bushs coalition of the willing against Iraq.
The old Turkish power structurethe nations military
leadership and governmental establishment, which previously called
the shotsis laying back to show Europeans how sensitive
to public opinion Turkey has become.
He then proceeded to tell the Turkish government in no uncertain
terms what was required if it wanted an unwavering superpower
on its side for decades to come ... What should Turkeys
new leaders do? First, make prompt parliamentary and construction
arrangements to welcome the US troops. And then go the extra mile:
Volunteer to mass 100,000 Turkish troops on its border with northern
Iraq.
Meanwhile, the army leadership has stepped up its pressure
on the AKP government. Early last week, General Özkök
called a press conference and denounced the elected civilian government
in a manner that left nobody in doubt as to the real power relationships
in Turkey. He rejected any criticisms of the internal purges carried
out by the army against suspected Islamists, vehemently opposed
any loosening of the ban on headscarves in public buildings and
then proceeded to address the main issue: Cyprus, he said, was
of essential importance for Turkeys ability to avert possible
dangers.
The Generals warning was promptly heeded. A few days
later, the foreign ministry stated that Turkeys policy towards
Cyprus remained unchanged and that any solution would
have to take into account the sovereign equality of
both states; i.e., the recognition of Northern Cyprus as an independent
state. Turkeys Prime Minister Gül came out explicitly
in support of President Denktash. Turkey, he said,
would continue to back him under all circumstances. The Turkish
government now suddenly attributed the demonstrations of the Turkish
Cypriots to provocations and Greek money. The government declared
the UN plan unacceptable to Turkey.
As far as Turkish support for the Iraq war is concerned, the
AKP government officially gave the US green light to have Turkeys
military bases inspected by a team of 150 specialists. In return,
the US Export Import Bank provided Turkey with a credit for the
purchase of 14 American military helicopters.
Knowing that the US needs them for the war against Iraq, the
Turkish military feel strengthened in their uncompromising position
towards Cyprus.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |