|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Medicine
& Health : HIV
/ AIDS
US and Europe renege on AIDS pledges
By Richard Tyler
22 July 2003
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
Pledges made by US president George W. Bush and European Union
Commission president Romano Prodi to each provide $1 billion for
the global fight against AIDS were proved worthless last week.
A meeting in Paris on July 16 of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS,
Tuberculosis and Malaria ended with no new money being advanced
to meet a massive cash shortfall.
The Global Fund was set up in 2002 and faces an estimated shortfall
of at least $400 million in its current spending. The Paris meeting
confronted a 50 percent deficit for the third funding round, starting
in October 2003, which needs between $800 million and $1 billion,
while the fund currently has access to only about $450 million.
Vuyiseka Dubula from the South African Treatment Action Campaign
called the donors meeting a scandal.
The wealthiest countries in the world are refusing the
amounts of money needed in 2003 and 2004 to begin to save our
lives, Dubula said following the second International AIDS
Society conference in Paris.
Describing the impact that the funding shortfall will have
on just one programme operated by Frances Médecins
Sans Frontières (MSF, Doctors Without Borders), Dr Nicolas
Durier told the press, If the necessary Global Fund money
doesnt come through, up to 50,000 Malawians living with
HIV/AIDS will be left to their own devices, without hope of their
lives being extended.
In an article headlined A Miserly Response to a Global
Emergency, Jeffrey Sachs, director of the Earth Institute
at Columbia University, wrote, On Wednesday, while the rich
countries gave their speeches and paraded their paltry generosity,
AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria claimed the lives of another 15,000
Africans.
The Bush administration has made tax cuts that amount
to about $20 billion per month since taking office. It has somehow
found about $60 billion so far to fight the Iraq war and is spending
$3.9 billion each month to station troops in Iraqan amount
that would more than fully finance the Global Fund in 2004, and
save millions of lives in the process, Sachs wrote.
According to Sachs, a White House official had told him Bush
was bypassing the Global Fund because the president did
not believe in committing taxpayers dollars to multilateral
initiatives of which the US is not in charge.
Sachs notes, In the first two-and-a-half years of the
Bush presidency, only a handful of Africans have received combination
antiretroviral therapy as a result of US bilateral programmes;
meanwhile, 5 million Africans have died of the disease and another
30 million are currently infected.
Less than two months ago, Congress had authorised $3 billion
spending, with $1 billion for the Global Fund, in an AIDS bill
that Bush had signed and then touted as he travelled across Africa.
However, across the Atlantic, a letter from the White House
was urging Congress to limit the total AIDS spending to just $2
billion, with only $200 million for the Global Fund.
Even as Bush posed before the cameras with AIDS victims on
his Africa tour, the Republican majority on the Appropriations
Committee of the House of Representatives duly cut back US spending
on the global fight against AIDS from $3 billion to $2 billion
for the fiscal year 2004.
This is surely one of the darkest days in the history
of the US response to global AIDS, Dr. Paul Zeitz, executive
director of the Global AIDS Alliance told the press.
Just as we feared, the $3 billion turned out to be an
empty promise to some of the most desperate people in the world,
including millions of children, Zeitz said.
The duplicity of the Bush administration was made complete
when Global Fund chairman Tommy Thompson, who is also US secretary
of health and human services, told the Paris gathering he was
he was fighting for the full $1 billion for the Global
Fund.
The Global Fund faces an even greater cash crisis in the medium
term, with some $10.5 billion required annually by 2005 just to
keep up with the spread of AIDS in Africa, Asia and Russia.
A recent United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) report
on global HIV/AIDS funding estimates that less than half the money
will be available that would be needed to fight the epidemic in
some of the worlds poorest countries.
According to Peter Piot, executive director of UNAIDS, the
mismatch between need and funding continues to be one of the biggest
obstacles in the struggle to control the epidemic.
UNAIDS and the World Health Organisation (WHO) estimate that
more than $10.5 billion a year will be needed in 2005 simply for
a barebones package of prevention, treatment, care
and support programmes in what they call low and middle-income
countries. This alone would require a doubling of the 2003
spending levels. By 2007, almost $15 billion will be needed,
the report states.
The report estimates that spending will have to continue at
this level for at least a decade thereafter if AIDS
is to be successfully combated.
See Also:
Bushs tour and US imperialisms
designs on Africa
[15 July 2003]
Bush uses AIDS funding as
an instrument of foreign policy
[18 February 2003]
HIV/AIDS
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |