|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Another criminal violation of human rights
US admits jailing children at Guantanamo Bay
By Richard Phillips
1 May 2003
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
Another instance of the Bush administrations remorseless
attack on basic democratic rights came to light last week after
US officials admitted they were imprisoning children under 16
years of age at the Camp Delta military prison in Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba.
The young prisoners, some of whom have been jailed in US military
prisons for over 12 months, are defined as enemy combatants
and are being interrogated for suspected links to Al Qaeda or
Afghanistans former Taliban government.
Like the more than 660 prisoners currently jailed at Guantanamo
Bay, the children have not been charged with any offense or given
access to legal counsel. They have been given no indication if
they will be released, whether they will be returned to their
native countries, or when, if ever, they will see their parents
and families again.
It is believed that one of the prisoners could be Canadian
born Omar Khadr, who was 15-years-old when captured on July 27
last year by US Special Forces in eastern Afghanistan. Press reports
quote unidentified US military sources claiming that Khadr was
involved in Al Qaeda weapons training and that he threw a hand-grenade
that killed a US soldier. This allegation has not been substantiated,
and Khadr has not been charged with any offense.
The first US admission of the long-rumoured child prisoners
came on April 23, a day after Australian ABC television and a
Canadian newspaper reported that there were juveniles at Camp
Delta.
Responding to these reports, military spokesman Lieutenant
Colonel Barry Johnson revealed that Guantanamo Bay prison officials
were detaining at least three children but refused
to divulge their countries of origin, names or exact ages.
Johnson claimed the children had the potential to provide
important information in the ongoing war on terrorism. Their
release, he declared, was contingent on the determination
that they are not a threat to the [US] nation and have no further
intelligence value. In other words, the US government will
continue to imprison and interrogate the children as long as it
deems fit.
This cruel and sadistic treatment breaches the most fundamental
tenets of international law, the Geneva Conventions and the recently
adopted Convention on the Rights of the Child in Armed Conflict.
Johnsons admissions immediately produced a wave of angry
denunciations by Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and
other human rights organisations.
Amnesty International described the conditions at Guantanamo
Bay as cruel, inhuman and degrading and called for
the immediate release and repatriation of the children. That
the US sees nothing wrong with holding children at Guantanamo
and interrogating them is a shocking indicator of how cavalier
the Bush administration has become about respecting human rights,
Amnesty International spokesman Alistair Hodgett said.
Human Rights Watch declared that the US was in breach of the
Convention on the Rights of the Child, United Nations Standard
Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice and the
UN Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty.
It said the accepted international definition of a child was anyone
under the age of 18.
Human Rights Watch pointed out that the installation of the
Hamid Karzai government in Afghanistan meant that the US no longer
had any legal authority to imprison former Taliban fighters, including
children.
The United Nations special representative for the rights of
children in war, Olara Otunnu, also called for the release of
the children. Whatever the circumstances, children should
be reunited with their families. We do not sentence children to
jail. We do not punish them. We give them healing and get them
rehabilitated, he said.
Defending the indefensible
US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and General Richard Myers,
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, rejected these appeals
out of hand at a Washington press briefing on April 25.
Rumsfeld alleged the prisoners were not children
and criticised what he described as a constant refrain of
the juveniles, as though theres 100 children
in there. He claimed the US was treating Guantanamo Bay
prisoners properly.
Myers told the media that the boys may be juveniles but
theyre not on the Little League team anywhere. Theyre
on a major league team, and its a terrorist team and theyre
in Guantanamo for a very good reasonfor our safety, for
your safety.
None of these comments was challenged by any of the journalists
present or reported in the mainstream US press.
In fact, the few newspapers that bothered to write on the child
prisoners glibly repeated military assertions that the juveniles
ages were not discovered until they underwent medical checks at
Guantanamo Bay. The Hearst Corporation-owned Seattle Post-Intelligencer
even claimed there had not been any credible reports of
abuse nor substantial complaints about the physical conditions
of the [Guantanamo Bay] detainees.
Guantanamo Bay can only be described as a hellhole. Adult prisoners,
who are subjected to sleep deprivation and other forms of torture,
are held in tiny 6.8 feet by 8 feet cells (2.1 x 2.4 metres) and
are only allowed out for two 15-minute shower and exercise sessions
per week. According to recent news reports, 10 percent of the
inmates have mental health problems and are being treated with
anti-depressants.
On April 27 Lieutenant Colonel Barry Johnson, in an attempt
to deflect the criticisms of human rights organisations, told
Associated Press that the children were being kept in separate
facilities from adult prisoners and allowed to watch videos and
play games. Im not sure where else in the worldgiven
their status as enemy combatantsthey would get this type
of setup, an environment designed to facilitate their development,
he said.
Notwithstanding this chilling claim, the childrens jailing
is a criminal offense under international law and the various
human rights protocols to which the US is a signatory.
International law and human rights standards recognise that
children under the age of 18, who are still developing physically,
mentally and emotionally, are particularly vulnerable to psychological
pressure and thus entitled to special care and protection at all
times. If children are involved in combat during war and captured,
international legal conventions rule that detention can only be
a measure of last resort. Child war prisoners must be able to
maintain contact with their families at all times and be released
and repatriated as soon as possible. If charged with any crime,
they must have full legal rights, including the prompt determination
of their cases.
The first attempt to legally codify and guarantee the rights
of children during military conflict, and secure international
approval, was made by the Red Cross in 1939. These efforts, however,
collapsed with the outbreak of World War II, when Nazi officials
in Eastern Europe arrested, imprisoned and even executed children
involved in the anti-fascist resistance.
To prevent any repeat of these crimes, 17 special protocols
were included in the 1949 Geneva Conventions to specifically protect
children. In 1977, the convention signatories adopted additional
measures.
Further legal protection was established under the United Nations
Convention of the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children
in armed conflict. In December 2002, the US endorsed the additional
protocols to this convention.
Under the agreement, the US must assist in the demobilisation
of former child soldiers and provide assistance, including family
reunification, counselling, education and vocational training,
to aid their reintegration into society as soon as possible.
But these legal protocols, which constitute the most minimal
standards of civilised human behaviour, are being violated on
a daily basis by the US government at Guantanamo Bay.
The Bush administration is not only tearing up the human rights
established in the aftermath of Nazi rule in Europe, but turning
the clock back hundreds of years on basic democratic principles.
US courts, for example, have rejected several habeas corpus challenges
on the detention, without charge or trial, of Afghanistan war
prisoners at Guantanamo Bay.
On March 11, a US court of appeal unanimously ruled that Guantanamo
Bay prisoners had no right to a trial or legal hearing in any
American court. The appeal was organised by lawyers representing
two Australians, David Hicks and Mamdouh Habib; two British citizens,
Safiq Rasul and Asif Iqbal; and 12 Kuwaitis imprisoned in Guantanamo
Bay by the US military since January 2001.
Appeal lawyers argued, in line with the Magna Carta principles
of 1215, that no one should be imprisoned without due process
of law and that the prisoners should either be charged and given
a trial in a US court or released. The appeal court ruling, however,
declared that the prisoners had no legal or constitutional rights
because writs of habeas corpus were unavailable to aliens
held outside US territory.
Last year US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly made the
extraordinary ruling in one court hearing that prisoners were
not being deprived of their legal right to due process because
they had not been charged with any offence.
Human rights organisations have warned that the indefinite
detention of juveniles at Guantanamo Bay will have a serious and
possibly irreparable impact on their psychological development
and overall health and lead to increasing incidences of suicide
and self-harm.
Last week Guantanamo Bay authorities revealed that a Camp Delta
prisoner receiving treatment in the acute care wing of the jails
mental health ward attempted to commit suicide on April 21. This
brings the number of suicide attempts at the prison to 25 by 17
individuals, with 15 attempts made this year alone.
One prisoner suffered serious brain damage when he tried to
hang himself on January 16. The damage was so severe that he is
unable to walk or talk and has been fed through a tube since his
suicide attempt. US officials have refused to release the age
or nationality of any of those who have tried to kill themselves.
They have also refused to notify the families.
See Also:
US tortures two detainees
to death in Afghanistan
[10 March 2003]
Australian government backs
imprisonment of Melbourne man in Pakistan
[26 February 2003]
New revelations about Guantanamo
Bay prisoners
[3 January 2003]
The CIAs international
dirty war
US oversees abduction, torture, execution of alleged terrorists
[20 March 2002]
Australian detainee
at Guantanamo Bay abandoned by Howard government
[8 February 2002]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |