|
WSWS : Arts
Review : Film
Reviews
Simplification of a complex historic figure
Ned Kelly, directed by Gregor Jordan, screenplay by
John Michael McDonagh from Our Sunshine by Robert Drewe
By Richard Phillips
17 May 2003
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
For Australian audiences, bushranger outlaw Ned Kelly (1855-80)
is probably one of the better-known figures of local nineteenth
century history. Dramatised in numerous books, poems and folksongs
since his execution by government authorities on November 11,
1880, Kelly is widely regarded as a defiant opponent of police
corruption and a Robin Hood-style champion of the underdog.
Ned Kelly, the latest movie by Australian director Gregor
Jordan (Two Hands [1999] and the unreleased Buffalo
Soldiers [2001]), is, however, a disappointment with few insights
into this complex character. Notwithstanding Jordans sincere
effort, the film rarely rises above a certain hero-worshipping
of Kelly with little examination of the social and political context
in which the famous outlaw emerged.
Bushranger Kelly grew up under conditions of economic oppression
and police harassment of poverty stricken small farmers in northeastern
Victoria. In fact, Kelly and his gang were among the most oppressed
layers of the district, their actions a manifestation of the long-running
conflict between small farmers and the wealthy agricultural elite
in the newly created colony of Victoria.
The discovery of gold during the mid-nineteenth century produced
a rapid expansion in the economy and population of Victoria, which
grew from 70,000 people in 1850 to over 500,000 by 1861. While
some individual miners were able to enrich themselves in the first
years of the rush, declining yields and high taxes ensured the
overwhelming majority gained little. Increasing social inequality
on the gold fields led to the Eureka Rebellion, a short-lived
but defiant uprising in 1854 against the colonial government and
local troopers.
Although the rebellion was crushed, the government was forced
to introduce various reforms, including the right to vote and
new land legislation. Small parcels of the land stolen from the
Aborigines by the white settlers were made available for selectors
or small farmers on a system of deferred or conditional payment.
The legislation was aimed at boosting local food production and
to dissipate the class tensions in gold mining districts and rural
centres.
The squatters or wealthy landowners, who mainly produced for
the agricultural export market, regarded these measures as a threat
to their profits and attempted to subvert them. Much of the official
political conflict in Victoria during the 1870s took place between
the rising urban bourgeoisie in Melbourne, who supported the land
reforms, and the squatters. In the countryside this took the form
of a simmering land war between the rich squatters and impoverished
selectors.
The majority of selectors, who were given the poorest land,
lived in dire poverty and at the mercy of the banks, loan sharks
and other financial parasites. According to an 1878 government
inquiry, it was not unusual for selectors to pay 20 to 30 percent
annual interest on loans.
These difficult conditions and the ever-present threat of drought
forced some of the poorest farmers and their families to take
desperate survival measures, including the theft of horses, cattle
and sheepfor sale and to provide food. The squatters responded
by demanding ruthless suppression of the stolen stock trade and
other economic crimes.
Ned Kellys father, James, was Irish and one of the many
hundreds of convicts transported to Australia from the late 1780s
to mid-1800s. He was arrested in Ireland for allegedly stealing
two pigs and, in 1842, sentenced to serve his jail term in Tasmania.
On release he became a gold prospector in Victoria and later met
and married Ellen Quinn, also of Irish stock.
The couple took up selection but had a large family
and lived a hand-to-mouth existence. The land they occupied, like
that of their immediate neighbours, could provide no reliable
source of income or sustenance and the threat of starvation and
eviction hung constantly over their heads.
The oldest of seven children, Ned Kelly became male head of
the household at the age of 11 after the death of his father in
1866. He fell foul of the police at an early age, was befriended
by a local bushranger, and at 15 was imprisoned for three years
on horse stealing charges.
After serving the jail sentence, Kelly secured work as a sheep
shearer and timber worker and also earned extra money, and a reputation,
at local fairs as a hard-hitting boxer. He also formed a partnership
with George King, his mothers de facto husband, in a well-organised,
two-colony stock-stealing operation.
Economic difficulties
In 1875 gold mining had all but collapsed in Victorias
northeast and small farmer bankruptcy blighted the region. These
problems were compounded by severe drought in 1877-78. According
to one contemporary report, the northeast resembled a succession
of dying towns and villages of ruinous and desolate appearance.
These conditions intensified the rural conflict and saw ongoing
police harassment of the Kelly family. Kelly later claimed that
he was constantly provoked by the police and prevented from earning
an honest living. Historical records confirm these allegations
with one senior police officer declaring: [W]henever they
[the Kellys] commit any paltry crime they must be sent to Pentridge
[jail], even on a paltry sentence, the object being to take their
prestige away from them.
In 1878 Kelly shot and wounded a local policeman after the
officer attempted to assault Neds sister Kate at the family
home. Kelly and his brother Dan fled into the bush to evade capture,
later joined by two friendsSteve Hart and Joe Byrne.
Ellen Kelly, Neds mother, was arrested and found guilty
over the incident. Justice Redmond Barry, one of Victorias
most hated judges, declared there should be no room for mistaken,
misdirected leniency and sentenced her to three years hard
labour. This provoked uproar in the district and Ned Kelly, with
support from relatives and local allies, vowed revenge.
State authorities responded by mobilising scores of police
to hunt down and arrest the gang. When three police were killed
in a shootout with the outlaws at Stringybark Creek, the Victorian
government declared the gang felons, to be shot on sight by any
member of the public, and placed an £8,000 bounty on their
heads. Any person harbouring, concealing or assisting the gang
or withholding information from the police could be arrested and
jailed for up to 15 years.
The four men, however, remained on the run for the next two
years: robbing banks, distributing much of their booty to friends
and allies, burning the mortgages of small farmers found in bank
vaults, and successfully evading the largest police manhunt in
the countrys history.
Some press reports, rather than turning public opinion against
the Kelly Gang, boosted their reputation. One newspaper described
one of the gangs bank robberies as daring and
skilful, explaining that the outlaws had treated
everyone with the greatest civility. The robbery was more
like a romance than a narration of actual occurrence, according
to the newspaper.
The colonial government reacted to each new exploit with even
more repression. Police were directed to compile a list of suspected
gang supporters and in January 1879 began mass roundups under
the Outlawry Act. Twenty-one people were arrested and held in
Beechworth jail without charge or trial for the next three and
half months. Blood relatives of the Kelly family or anyone deemed
to have supported the gang, were also denied the right to become
land selectors by local authorities.
During a bank holdup in the New South Wales town of Jerilderie
in early 1879, Kelly dictated a defiant 8,500-word letter to the
state government protesting the police harassment of his family
and the local community. It contained an impassioned call for
an end to English rule over Ireland and a bitter denunciation
of Victorian police, which he colourfully referred to as big
ugly fat-necked wombat headed big bellied magpie legged narrow
hipped splayfooted sons of Irish bailiffs of English landlords.
According to some historians, the bushranger also dreamt of
a northeast Victorian republic, free of British rule, to provide
a better deal for small selectors. This political perspective
resonated with many selectors and landless labourers throughout
the region, but it was never seriously codified and the Kelly
outbreak, as it became known, was isolated and contained.
The four men remained outlaws and were eventually cornered in
the town of Glenrowan in 1880.
The Kelly Gang took control of the small town in late June
and planned to derail a trainload of heavily armed troopers sent
to capture them. The rail line was torn up but a local teacher
flagged down the engine and the troopers were able to safely disembark
and surround the local hotel where the outlaws were encamped,
and unleash a furious burst of gunfire.
The gang emerged from the hotel wearing their now iconic iron
armour to do battle with the troopers, but were forced back inside
the building. A nine-and-a-half-hour siege ensued. Police eventually
torched the hotel and three of the gang members were killed. Ned
Kelly escaped the blaze but was wounded and captured in a shoot
out with the troopers the next morning.
Put on trial in Melbourne in October 1880, 25-year-old Kelly
was found guilty of murder and sentenced to hang by Justice Redmond
Barry. He was executed on November 11, despite widespread popular
opposition, including demonstrations, public meetings and petitions
to the government.
A lost opportunity
Kellys story has much to offer, but Jordans film,
which is based on Robert Drewes novel Our Sunshine,
lacks historical depth and therefore cannot provide the intelligent
character development required of its rich subject matter.
Heath Ledger (Ned Kelly), Orlando Bloom (Joe Byrne), Laurence
Kinlan (Dan Kelly), Philip Barantini (Steve Hart) and Joel Edgerton
as Aaron Sherrit try hard but are unable to transcend a generally
weak script. Moreover a heavy-handed music soundtrack often drowns
them out.
One of the films better moments dramatises Kellys
composition of the Jerilderie Letter. As he dictates the letter
in the austere Jerilderie bank, the film cuts to Victorian Premier
Graham Berry in his sumptuous Melbourne office reading passages
of Kellys angry correspondence. This is well done and succinctly
establishes the class division between the two men and trepidation
felt by the colonial leaders. Oliver Stapletons cinematography
also effectively captures the harsh existence of the Kelly family.
Some of the bush landscapes are particularly striking, as is the
siege at Glenrowan.
But the film, apart from some obvious references to police
persecution, fails to convince that it was grinding poverty that
forced many selectors to take up stock theft and other desperate
measures in order to survive. Nor does it attempt to explore some
of the deeper social and political factors at work.
Instead, Jordan preoccupies himself with the sorts of elements
generally deemed by marketing executives to be vital
for a commercially successful movie. There is a love interest,
lots of gunfire and plenty of bloodshed. Unsurprisingly, these
provide no psychological substance to the film. Kelly is uniformly
strong and determined, with no complexities or contradictions.
A fictional love affair between Kelly and Julia Cook (Naomi
Watts), a rich farmers daughter, is rather pointless. A
cameo appearance by Rachel Griffith as the sexually charged wife
of the Jerilderie bank manager is also tedious and unnecessary.
In another scene, Jordan has the gang slash a horses
throat so they can drink its blood. This ludicrous melodrama is
supposed to occur because police have poisoned local waterholes
and the gang has no access to waterthis event in a region
brimming with rivers and creeks.
Superintendent Hare, played by Geoffrey Rush who has few lines
and does little more than scowl at the camera, leads the state
posse to kill or capture the gang. At one point he warns the assembled
troopers of the movement supporting the Kelly Gang.
But this is never examined. The Kelly Gang is largely presented
as an isolated group and little indication provided of the widespread
hostility of small farmers in the northeast against the police
and their brutal methods.
Unfortunately the film also ends with Kellys capture
at Glenrowan. This means that some of the more dramatically interesting
and challenging aspects of the periodKellys controversial
trial in which he stood up to Justice Redmond Barry and the mass
opposition to his executionare not dealt with at all. Yet,
much could have been made of these events.
Kelly told Melbournes Age newspaper during his
trial that, If my life teaches the public that men are made
mad by bad treatment, and if the police [are] taught that they
may not exasperate to madness men they persecute and ill-treat,
my life will not be entirely thrown away.
In the same comment he remarked that city dwellers had no
idea of the tyrannical conduct of the police in country places
far removed from court, they have no idea of the harsh and over-bearing
manner in which they execute their duty.
Over 60,000 people signed petitions and an 8,000-strong mass
meeting was held in Melbourne in opposition to Kellys execution.
As one newspaper nervously observed: Nor do the expressions
of sympathy for poor Ned emanate only from the larrikin and criminal
classes, but many men and women who ... are designated enlightened
citizen, freely express their commiseration....
This broad support reflected the deepening class tensions in
the colonynot just between small farmers and the squatters
but the emerging working class and the financial elite. Unemployment
was such a problem in Melbourne at this time that the government
was forced to establish a public works program employing 1,200
men at six shillings a day. According to one historical account,
Premier Berry faced regular deputations of unemployed and discontented
people talking of riot and revolution.
The colonial authorities were determined to show that any challenge
to their rule would be met with the full force of the law. That
is why Kelly had to be made an example of at all costs. The government
was so anxious to intimidate those opposing its authority that
following Kellys execution his head was sawn off, brain
removed and the skull reportedly used as a paperweight by a government
official.
An indication of the acute nervousness felt by the governing
authorities at this time was a call issued by the Beechworth Advertiser
for new laws to empower the Governor-in-Council not only
to suspend the Habeas Corpus Act in a defined region, but to place
it in a state of siege.... [I]f a handful of ruffians commence
a war of incendiarism and personal outrage, the public ought to
be so armed as to make it a war of extermination. None of
these issues, unfortunately, are alluded to in Jordans film.
It should be acknowledged, however, that in the last two years
Jordan has come under significant political and commercial pressure
over Buffalo Soldiers, his previous film.
Buffalo Soldiers, which was completed in early 2001
and critically acclaimed in some quarters, is a dark comedy about
the US military and depicts drug dealing and corruption amongst
American soldiers in West Germany in 1989.
Miramax purchased distribution rights to the movie at the Toronto
Film Festival in 2001 but after the September 11 terrorist attacks
on the US, it has effectively censored the film, shelving its
release five times. The Hollywood company, which also delayed
release of Phillip Noyces The Quiet American for
more than 18 months, has capitulated to the Bush administration
and is no longer prepared to back anything vaguely critical of
the US government or military.
Announcing another delay in the films release, Miramax
chief operating officer Rick Sands said last month that the company
had to be sensitive to the current situation in the world
and did not want the film misinterpreted.
At this stage Jordan has accepted the decision, stating that
he did not want his movie seen in the wrong light.
One wonders what impact this experience has had on the relatively
inexperienced filmmaker and whether it had any influence on the
production of Ned Kelly.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |