|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
Britain: Union sells out postal strike
By Keith Lee
6 November 2003
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
Nearly 30,000 postal workers returned to work on November 3
after a two-week unofficial strike was ended following a deal
struck between the Communication Workers Union (CWU) and Royal
Mail. In an expression of gratitude to the CWU for its work in
ending the strike, Royal Mail has said that it recognises that
the CWU did not instigate the unofficial action and that they
will not make any legal claims on the union.
The main points of the deal are that Royal Mail will not conduct
disciplinary action against its staff for taking unofficial action;
managers and employees will cooperate to ensure that service to
the customer is returned to normal as soon as possible and that
all mail will be handled regardless of where it is posted or by
whom it has been processed or distributed.
Most importantly, the agreement states that Royal Mail and
the CWU will commit to fully abide by the terms of all existing
national agreements including the IR [Industrial Relations] Framework,
Way Forward and Scheduled attendance agreements.
Any local agreements or arrangements that either party
can identify that conflict with national agreements will be jointly
reviewed locally to ensure they comply by the end of 2003. Through
our respective national teams, Billy Hayes, Dave Ward, Allan Leighton
and Adam Crozier are all committed to achieving a national agreement
on single delivery by December 10 2003 at ACAS.
By identifying the problem as one of local agreements breaching
national agreements, the CWU have in effect signed on once more
to Royal Mails plans to privatise substantial parts of the
postal service and step up its attacks on jobs and working conditions,
as exemplified in the instigation of a single delivery system.
From day one of the strike, Royal Mail has sought to push through
the privatisation of the remaining sections of the Post Office
as quickly as possible. This means the tearing up of old agreements
and the implementation of new methods of working, such as the
ending of a twice-daily delivery serviceto be replaced with
a single serviceand treating Saturday as a normal working
day.
The head of Royal Mail, Alan Leighton, who is a Labour Party
member and has been fully supported by the Blair government, is
attempting to complete a process that was began in the early 1980s.
Privatisation is driven by two related developments. Firstly,
the exponential growth of electronic mail has placed massive demands
on postal services the world over to cut costs and improve efficiency
in order to remain competitive. It is now five years since the
number of international messages sent by fax took a bigger share
of the market than those conveyed by post. In 2000, for the first
time the volume of e-mail in the United States exceeded the number
of letters delivered by the US Postal Service. Computers now generate
more than 80 percent of all mail sent.
Secondly, the globalisation of trade and industry facilitated
by these same technological developments has torn the ground from
under the postal service as a nationally based venture. Whereas
the Post Office once enjoyed monopoly status as a domestic carrier,
today it is forced to compete at home and abroad against its international
rivals.
In Britain, restructuring is being stepped up due to the pressure
being exerted from the European Union (EU) to reduce the monopoly
held by national postal carriers and open up markets to competition.
The first stage of this liberalisation will be completed by the
end of this year, and the next stage in 2007. This has already
led to massive job losses in Europe.
The wildcat strike expressed hostility to the impact of the
privatisation of the post, but took the character of a defensive
struggle to preserve existing working conditions. And it has highlighted
the schism that has opened up between the workforce and not only
the Royal Mail bosses but their allies in the CWU union bureaucracy.
The CWU has verbally opposed privatisation, but in practice
has worked with Royal Mail to implement it. The union has not
organised a single campaign or called a strike against privatisation.
Numerous articles in the media have tried to say that the strike
was spearheaded by the national union though its local activists
oraccording to the radical pressthat this was a strike
to defend the union. Royal Mail accused the CWU and especially
its leader Billy Hayeswho is part of the
so called awkward squad of recently elected left union
leadersof running the strike.
The purpose of this attack was to place maximum pressure on
the union leaders to call their members to order. But the CWU
hardly needed any encouragement to do this. From day one, the
CWU repudiated the unofficial action and distanced itself from
the strike. It then worked with Royal Mail to end it. Its main
complaint against Royal Mail was that of an aggrieved partner.
It accused management of seeking to impose the changes in working
practices through what the CWU called executive action
(i.e., without union help).
For two years, the union has cooperated in a no-strike deal
with Royal Mail in return for being consulted on changes
in working practices. The awkward squadder Mr. Hayes
has in fact presided over record increases of productivity and
overseen a 91 percent reduction in strike action. As part of the
latest deal, the CWU has now agreed to working for the end of
a second delivery and the start of a once-over-the-ground delivery
by December of this year.
See Also:
London: Royal Mail provokes unofficial
postal strike
[1 November 2003]
Britain: Postal workers
vote for national pay strike
[13 February 2002]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |