|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
California supermarket chains mount strikebreaking drive against
grocery workers
By Rafael Azul and Kim Saito
13 October 2003
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The major supermarket chains in southern California are mounting
a coordinated strikebreaking drive against 70,000 grocery workers,
who are fighting the employers demands for wage cuts and
other contract concessions.
The workers, members of the United Food and Commercial Workers
Union (UFCW), are employed by the Vons, Pavilions, Ralphs
and Albertsons chains. The union called a strike and set
up picket lines Saturday night against Vons and Pavilions, both
of which are owned by the Safeway supermarket giant. The two other
chains responded by locking out their employees.
All of the chains, which together own 859 markets in the region,
are keeping their doors open with the aid of strikebreakers hired
in advance of the contract expiration. Workerssome of whom
are UFCW membershave been flown in from other states to
scab on the strikers. Others have been hired locally for $19 an
hour.
This union-busting attack, taking place within days of the
recall election that removed Democratic Governor Gray Davis and
installed Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger, has starkly revealed
the social and class conflicts that were at the root of the California
budget crisis and the recall election. The drive to remove Davis,
who was elected to a second term as governor last November, was
financed and organized by right-wing Republicans with the backing
of major corporate interests.
The grocery store employees are among the lowest paid and most
oppressed sections of the working class in California. Most are
forced to work part-time and never approach the top pay rates
in their job classifications.
While the top hourly wage for a checkout clerk is $17.90, few
workers reach that level and baggers earn as little as $6.75 an
hour. The weekly pay for many grocery workers in California is
not sufficient to rent a modest apartment, let alone raise a family.
Not surprisingly, none of the politicians of either of the
two big business parties, all of whom postured as friends of ordinary
Californians during the special election, have protested the use
of strikebreaking tactics by the supermarket chains. Schwarzenegger,
the governor-elect, who pledged to defend the people against special
interests, has said nothing to discourage the supermarket
giants from attacking the jobs and living standards of thousands
of California workers. It has taken less than a week for the mask
to be removed from this film actor-turned populist,
exposing him for what he is: a front man for a corporate elite
intent on removing all restraints on big business and destroying
all that remains of the past gains of the working class.
The response of the UFCW and the AFL-CIO as a whole has been
no less predictable. They have done nothing to seriously oppose
the strikebreaking. There has been no hint of an effort to mobilize
workers, union and nonunion, to halt the use of scabs and shut
down the supermarkets. The fact that the UFCW refused to call
a strike against all of the chains is indicative of the cowardly
posture of the union leadership. Union officials, moreover, publicly
declared prior to the strike that they were prepared to offer
contract concessions, but complained that the demands of the employers
were too sweeping for them to put before their membership.
This is the first grocery strike in southern California in
25 years. In 1978, supermarkets attempted to stay open but were
unable to restock their shelves because Teamsters drivers refused
to cross the picket lines. This time, management personnel have
been trained to move the trucks.
Negotiators for the UFCW and the supermarket chains had set
aside a midnight strike deadline on Friday, October 10 and continued
negotiations in the presence of a federal mediator. A nine-hour
negotiating session on October 11 failed to produce an agreement.
The grocery workers Master Contract for Southern California
expired October 6.
Earlier in the week, 50,000 clerks and baggers who belong to
seven UFCW locals voted by a 98 percent margin to reject the employers
concessions demands. These include substandard pay and benefits
for new-hires, drastic givebacks in health and pension benefits,
reductions in premium pay, and the gutting of work rules. Under
the proposed contract:
* The top pay of new-hires would be permanently capped at $14.90
an hour, establishing a two-tier wage system. Newly hired courtesy
checkers (baggers) would not only receive the $6.75 poverty-level
wage of those presently employed, they would also be deprived
of health benefits.
* Workers would lose dental and optical coverage and have to
pay $75 a month for prescription coverage and $15 a week for health
insurance. Hospital stays and chemotherapy treatments would be
capped, potentially adding tens of thousands of dollars to workers
health bills. These changes would shift $1,300 a year in health
costs from the supermarkets to the workers families.
* Work rule changes would permit outsourcing of stocking duties
and allow the operation of nonunion stores in some areas. Split
shifts would be introduced for part-time workers and night shift
premiums would be cut for all workers. Sunday shift premiums would
be frozen for current employees and slashed by $1 for new-hires.
* Pensions for new-hires would be substantially downgraded,
and the employers contributions to the pension plan would
be sufficient to cover only benefits accrued up to now, but insufficient
to guarantee future benefits
* There would be no wage increase for the first two years of
the three-year agreement.
UFCW officials have declared that they are defending middle
class living standards. For the majority of grocery workers, however,
anything resembling such standards was surrendered by the UFCW
in previous contracts. Throughout the 1990s, the UFCW repeatedly
bowed to the employers demands for wage and work rule concessions
that have resulted in cuts in real wages and benefits and the
slashing of jobs nationwide.
The drive by the supermarket chains to cut costs is fueled
by fierce competition and consolidation in the industry. Profit
margins have declined as Wal-Mart, Target and other nonunion entrants
have captured market share at the expense of unionized chains.
Wal-Mart mega stores, for instance, are able to undersell the
national chains by as much as 27 percent, largely because of their
lower labor costs. Wal-Mart wages for grocery clerks average $8.50
an hour, with sharply reduced health and pension benefits relative
to the companys competitors.
The retail giant intends to open 40 supermarkets in southern
California in the next few years, challenging Safeway, Kroger
(which recently bought out Ralphs) and Albertsons,
which now control more than 70 percent of the southern California
market. The supermarket chains are using Wal-Mart as a pretext
to slash their workers wages and benefits.
The strike in southern California has a national significance.
Grocery workers in St. Louis have been on strike since October
7 against three supermarket chains.
The UFCW contract in Arizona will expire on October 26. Some
14,000 workers there could walk out at Safeway and Frys
supermarkets. At issue in Arizona is the elimination of a 20-hours-a-week
guarantee for workers with at least one year of experience and
an increase in the minimum hours necessary to receive health insurance.
New Mexico supermarket workers are currently working without
a contract. Negotiations are also taking place in Chicago, New
York and Indianapolis, mainly over health care costs.
A reporter for the World Socialist
Web Site spoke to pickets at one of the Albertsons stores
in Irvine, California. Odell Moore, the picket captain, with 17
years in the industry and seven years at that location, said,
Management wants us to have less benefits, less wages and
practically no pensions. This would also affect people who retired
10-12 years ago because it would be retroactive. They want to
institute a two-tier contract and a 50 percent cut in health and
welfare benefits, with $15 to $20 more taken out of our paycheck,
plus higher co-pays.
The store management spent $500,000 preparing for this
strike. Management is in there working, but theyve also
hired out-of-state Albertsons employees who are UFCW members.
There are also people being hired off the street.
Right now, only the check stands are being manned. There
are maybe one or two people in some other departments. Nobodys
working in the meat department.
A lot of people are crossing the lines here in Irvine.
Many of them work for Fortune 500 companies and dont see
why they should support us.
Pat, who works in the bakery department, said,
I have 11 years seniority and was hoping to be able to retire
soon, but I dont think I can. We dont mind co-pay
on our health insurance, but the increases theyre demanding
are too much. If somebody hadnt done this for me a long
time ago, I wouldnt have any benefits. The top people in
this company are making so much money, and were not even
asking for a pay raise.
The scabs are getting paid $19 an hour. After 11 years,
I get about $12. Their hotel and food are also being paid for.
The company hired one gal who came here with her husband from
Washington state. She had no idea that we were getting ready to
strike. They didnt tell her. She ended up walking out, saying
she wouldnt dare cross a picket line.
See Also:
Lessons of the Democratic debacle in
California
[9 October 2003]
SEP meeting addresses political issues
facing workers in California recall election
[7 October 2003]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |