|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
Support the Iraqi resistance. Australian troops out of Iraq.
By the Socialist Equality Party (Australia)
10 April 2004
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The Socialist Equality Party in Australia calls on all working
people, students and professional people to demonstrate against
the criminal blood-letting being conducted against the Iraqi people
by the US-led occupying forces and to demand the immediate withdrawal
of all Australian forces from Iraq.
The working class must come to the defence of the Iraqi masses,
whose legitimate uprising against colonial oppression is being
met with homicidal massacres across central and southern Iraq.
The courageous and heroic house-to-house resistance being offered
by the Iraqi people in Fallujah and other cities, against the
worlds largest and most technologically-sophisticated military
force, has already shattered the myth of American invincibility.
In retaliation, a crime of monstrous proportions is being carried
out: residential areas and even mosques are being bombed, homes
and crowded streets strafed, and thousands of Iraqi men, women
and children killed or maimed.
Those responsible are nothing but mass murderers and war criminals.
This includes not just the Bush and Blair governments, but their
allies in the Australian political establishment. Anyone who seeks
to justify this barbaric slaughter in the name of delivering freedom
and democracy to the Iraqi people, is beyond the pale.
This is a popular rebellion by the poorest and most oppressed
layers of Iraqi society. Amid growing reports of solidarity between
the Sunni uprising in central Iraq and the Shiite insurrection
in Baghdad and the south, the underlying class basis of this movement
has come to the fore. This is an army of the dispossessed,
observed Joost Hiltermann of the International Crisis Group. Its
a class thing, not just an ethnic and religious divide.
The uprising is directed against an occupying army sent to
take over Iraq, impose US rule and install a Quisling government
to implement the plundering interests of the American corporate
eliteabove all to grab control of the Iraqi oilfields. The
nation-wide revolt is a staggering blow to the Bush administration
and its plans to establish unchallenged US military and economic
hegemony over the entire Middle East and Central Asia.
That is why, acting on orders from the White House and Pentagon,
US commanders have openly declared their intention to drown the
rebellion in blood. In a typically macabre statement, Lieutenant-General
Ricardo Sanchez, commander of the coalition ground forces, vowed
to conduct deliberate, precise and robust combat operations
to separate, isolate and destroy the enemy wherever we find him
on the battlefield.
The participation by the Howard government in the war on Iraqan
unprovoked act of aggression against a defenceless country carried
out on the basis of lies and concoctionshas become one of
the darkest chapters in Australian history, ranking alongside
the dispossession of the Aboriginal people and the decade-long
involvement in the Vietnam War.
From the outset, Howard and his government have been the principal
international cheerleaders of the Bush administration and its
doctrine of pre-emptive war. They have unflaggingly promoted every
fabrication cooked up in Washington to justify the war on Iraq,
from weapons of mass destruction to claims that crowds
would fete the invading troops as liberators.
In the face of massive public opposition, expressed in antiwar
marches involving close to a million people, and behind the back
of parliament, Howard secretly committed SAS and other key personnel
to the invasion some nine months before it took place.
Now, in direct response to the Iraqi uprising, the government
has reaffirmed its unconditional backing for the US occupation.
Whatever the cost to the Iraqi people, Howard is intent on shoring
up the Bush administration and the US-Australia alliance in a
quid pro quo aimed at furthering Australias own neo-colonial
interests in the South Pacific region. Not only are millions of
ordinary Australians responding with horror and revulsion to the
ongoing slaughter, but warnings are emerging from within the Liberal
Party establishment itself that the alliance will lead to an historic
debacle.
Malcolm Fraser, a former prime minister who was army and defence
minister during the Vietnam War, has made pointed comparisons
to that bloody conflict. Its not just the Shiites
that came out in force, or one section of the Shiites, its
not just the Sunnis, its not just the loyalists to Saddam
Hussein, its Iraqis who want America out, Fraser observed.
And if that feeling grows, the more Iraqis that get killed,
the more people will want America out.
Former Liberal Party president John Valder has gone further,
saying there is a case for the American, British and Australian
leaders to face a war crimes tribunal. They were party to
what has turned out to be an open act of aggression against a
third party that was in no way a threat to them. Their reasons
for going in have proven to be absolutely baseless.
It is highly noteworthy that these criticisms are far stronger
than anything emanating from the parliamentary arenaabove
all from the Labor party and its new leader Mark Latham. That
is why Howard has been able to ride them out, dismissing references
to war crimes out of hand and declaring that his government will
not cut and run from Iraq, but stay while theres
a job to be done. It has to be clearly understood: finishing
the job, means the complete crushing of the resistance of
the Iraqi people as a whole. To find historical parallels, one
must go back to the Nazi occupation of Poland, the Italian fascist
annexation of Abyssinia and the Japanese conquests of Korea and
Manchuria.
With the collapse of all his previous lies, Howard has sought
a new justification for continuing the deployment of Australian
troops in Iraq. Having collaborated with Bush and Blair in the
systematic bombardment and destruction of Iraqi cities and towns,
he has insisted, with breathtaking hypocrisy, that Australian
forces must remain in the country in order to help the Iraqi people
rebuild it. In an article published by the Wall Street Journal
on March 26, Howard argued that Australian troops were helping
to secure essential services for the people of Iraq.
In point of fact, the primary reason for the continued presence
of the 280 Australian soldiers in Iraq, and 600 in neighbouring
areas, is to provide international political legitimacy for the
illegal US occupation. Facing a catastrophic quagmire, the Bush
administration is desperate to prevent any withdrawals by Spain,
Poland, Lithuania, the Netherlands and other coalition partners
whose governments are under mounting popular pressure to pull
out.
On the ground, the tasks assigned to the Australian contingent
have nothing to do with assisting the Iraqi people. Its brief
is to provide logistical and practical support to the US forces.
Air traffic controllers are ensuring the operation of Baghdad
airport, which is crucial for the movement of troops, military
hardware and business traffic, while other forces are helping
train the police and security agents of a future Iraqi stooge
regime or patrolling the sea and air lanes around the Persian
Gulf.
The rest are guarding the Australian embassy, primarily for
the benefit of visiting businessmen, who are already reaping the
rewards of Canberras participation in the invasion. Major
Australian corporations have so far picked up contracts worth
more than $1 billion from the Coalition Provisional Authority.
Some 70 local firms are in the running for further deals worth
$24 billion, particularly in agribusiness, infrastructure, consultancies
and private security work. Last month, Australias monopoly
wheat exporter was handed a contract to supply 460,000 tonnes
of wheat.
Visiting his Australian media empire this week, Rupert Murdoch,
whose newspapers and television networks in Australia and around
the world have played a key role in promoting the criminal conquest
of Iraq, propagating every sham pretext dished out by Bush administration
officials, praised Howard for remaining absolutely firm.
This countrys got no alternative, it must stand with
America, he declared.
Labors complicity
Since tentatively suggesting, two weeks ago, that a Labor government
would try to withdraw troops by Christmas, Labor leader Mark Latham
has been at pains to emphasise his ongoing support for the US
war aims.
In response to the Iraqi uprising and US retaliation, he has
insisted that Australian forces must remain in Iraq, for at least
the next several months, in order to fulfil Australias obligations
as an occupying power. His pretext is that sovereignty must
first be transferred to the Iraqi peoplein other
words, a puppet government made up of US-backed stooges that will
sanction the indefinite continuation of the US military presence
and the exploitation of the countrys oil wealth by US, British
and other foreign corporations. Lathams positions simply
underscore Labors complicity in all the dirty crimes of
the Howard government.
At the same time, Latham has reaffirmed his commitment to the
US alliance by criticizing Howard for pulling out of Afghanistan,
which also remains under US occupation. The Labor leader has declared
Afghanistan to be the frontline of the war on terrorisma
euphemism for the ever-escalating use of pre-emptive military
strikes to establish the global hegemony of US imperialism.
The working class in Australia and internationally cannot allow
the crimes of the Howard government and its patrons in Washington
to continue. The Socialist Equality Party calls for rallies to
be organised to demonstrate against the atrocities being committed
in Iraq by the US and other occupation forces and to declare the
solidarity of ordinary Australians with the Iraq people, who have
the fundamental right to determine their own political destiny.
The demand must be raised for the immediate and unconditional
withdrawal of all Australian, American and foreign forces from
Iraq and for all those responsible for planning, organising and
propagandising in favour of the warincluding Howard and
Murdochto be tried and punished as war criminals.
Above all, the development of a genuine and viable anti-war
movement necessitates a complete break from the Labor party and
the entire official political establishment. It requires an entirely
new strategythe independent political mobilization of working
people in Australia, the United States, Iraq and internationally
against imperialism on the basis of a socialist and internationalist
program.
See Also:
Defend the Iraqi masses
[8 April 2004]
Australia: Political uproar
over Labor leader's call for troop withdrawal from Iraq
[29 March 2004]
Australia: Spanish defeat
exposes vulnerability of Howard government
[19 March 2004]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |