|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Iraq crisis spurs call for US military draft
By Bill Van Auken
22 April 2004
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
With the Pentagon straining to find troops to confront the
popular resistance in Iraq, and over 100 US soldiers killed since
the beginning of this month, a senior Republican legislator has
called for the reinstitution of the military draft, abolished
during the Vietnam War more than 30 years ago.
Senator Chuck Hagel (Republican from Nebraska), appearing on
NBC televisions Today Show on Wednesday, said
that mandatory military service had to be considered in the face
of what he described as a generational war against terrorism.
He added that the middle class and the lower
middle class should not be forced to bear the burden of
fighting and dying if, in fact, this is a generationalprobably
25-yearwar.
Hagels remarks on the Today Show echoed his
statement to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee the day before,
when he argued that conscription would force our citizens
to understand the intensity and depth of challenges we face.
Also appearing on the NBC program was Senator Joseph Biden
(Democrat from Delaware), like Hagel a ranking member of the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee. Biden stated that the US Army was
not large enough to occupy Iraq and simultaneously carry out the
other US military deployments around the globe. As for a draft,
the Democratic senator said conscription was not necessary now.
Asked about Hagels proposal at a White House press briefing
Wednesday, presidential spokesman Scott McClellan replied that
reinstatement of the draft is not something thats
under consideration. He refused to be drawn out by the reporters
follow-up question on whether Bush was ruling out military conscription
categorically.
The public discussion of the draft has been initiated in an
atmosphere of mounting crisis over the US occupation of Iraq.
At a point where US casualties have reached levels unprecedented
since the Vietnam War, the military has extended by three months
the tours of duty of some 20,000 US soldiers who were about to
return to the US. The order has kept US troop strength in Iraq
at 135,000.
At a Pentagon briefing Tuesday, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
said that military planners had already devised plans to replace
the 20,000 whose tours had been extended, should US commanders
determine that they still need 135,000 troops in July. He added
that the Pentagon had thought through what measures
would be taken should even more troops be requested.
The strain on the US military has been compounded by the collapse
of much of the Iraqi security force that the Pentagon had hastily
trained and deployed. In the face of the mass uprising of the
past three weeks, police turned over their stations and weapons
to anti-occupation fighters in many towns and, in some cases,
joined the insurgency. US-organized Iraqi military units suffered
wholesale defections and there was at least one case of mutiny
over orders to march on the besieged city of Fallujah.
The fierce fighting has likewise had its impact on the so-called
coalition assembled by Washington from a relatively
small number of pro-US governments. Spains announcement
that it is withdrawing its 1,300 troops has been followed by similar
decisions by the governments of Honduras and the Dominican Republic,
which together had sent approximately 700 soldiers to Iraq. Poland
is broadly hinting that it may withdraw its troops from Iraq in
September, when its current commitment expires.
While having little direct impact on US military operations,
these withdrawals make it clear that there is very little likelihood
that any other countries will send significant forces to relieve
the US military burden.
Rumsfeld gave no details as to where the Pentagon would find
the needed troops in the event that the Iraqi insurgency continues.
Most of the militarys major combat units have either been
deployed to Iraq, have recently left, or are preparing to return.
Nearly two thirds of the Armys 500,000 soldiers are already
deployed overseas, with US military units operating today in some
130 countries, in addition to fighting the ongoing wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan.
To shore up a US military that is strained to its limits, the
administration has resorted to drastic measures, including stop
loss and stop move orders. The former bar members
of the military from retiring or resigning, subjecting them to
forced service. The latter compel troops, like the 20,000 in Iraq,
to continue hardship assignments after their tours have ended.
Both have had devastating effects on troop morale, raising official
concerns that the military will see an exodus of experienced soldiers
in the coming months.
While denying that they are even considering a revival of the
draft, the Bush administration and the military have been conducting
a low-profile recruitment campaign in recent months to staff the
countrys Selective Service boards with more than 10,000
volunteers. If the draft were reinstated, these boards would have
the authority to accept or reject appeals by young men seeking
deferments from military service.
Most politicians from both major parties have shied away from
discussing a return to the draft during the election year. Until
Hagels statements, however, Democrats had been more vocal
than Republicans. The Democrats presumptive presidential
candidate, Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, has included in his
platform a call for mandatory public service by American
youth.
In January 2003, Senator Fritz Hollings (Democrat from South
Carolina) and Representative Charles Rangel (Democrat from New
York) introduced a Universal National Service Act
that would compel all American citizens and permanent residents
aged 18-26 to perform either military or civilian service. At
the time, the two issued a joint statement describing themselves
as extraordinarily concerned that our militarys current
capacity would not allow it to fight multiple wars at once.
Like Hagel, the Democrats posed the reinstitution of the draft
as a matter of equity, pointing to the deployment to Iraq of large
numbers of National Guard members who had joined the military
because of scarce economic resources and the need for tuition
assistance. As the Vietnam War demonstrated, however, any introduction
of military conscription will inevitably be imposed on the backs
of the working class and the poor, while the children of the most
privileged social layers find multiple ways to avoid military
service.
Within the military itself there are severe misgivings about
reviving the Selective Service system. Compelling youth to perform
military service against their will in a widely unpopular colonial
war, they fear, could quickly create the kind of breakdown of
discipline and mutinous mood that nearly destroyed the US Army
during the Vietnam War.
Nonetheless, both parties have made it clear that they have
no intention of ending the occupation of Iraq. With little prospect
of significant forces coming from other countries, and with no
indication that popular resistance to the US takeover of Iraq
is abating, Washington will inevitably find itself compelled to
increase its troop strength there. Under conditions in which the
military is already over-extended, the US government, whichever
party wins the November election, may conclude it has no choice
but to revive the draft in order to maintain the occupation.
The current talk about reviving the draft represents the initial
trial balloons, to be followed at some point by a media offensive
aimed at depicting conscription as both a patriotic and democratic
initiative. Thus, a cynical campaign has begun to dragoon many
thousands of American youth, who are to be used as cannon fodder
in an illegal colonial war, launched on the basis of lies for
predatory aims that have been concealed from the American people.
See Also:
Kerry on "Meet the Press:"
Democratic candidate reiterates support for Iraq war
[19 April 2004]
Bush's press conference: evasions, lies
and a promise of more bloodletting
[15 April 2004]
Socialist Equality Party US presidential
candidate: "A vote for Kerry is a vote for war"
[14 April 2004]
SEP presidential candidate: "Pull
all US troops out of Iraq now"
[10 April 2004]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |