|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
Solomon Islands: prison protest over lack of rights under
Australian intervention
By Mike Head
18 August 2004
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
A prison protest broke out in the Solomon Islands last week,
less than three weeks after official celebrations to mark the
first anniversary of the arrival of more than 2,000 Australian-led
military and police officers in the South Pacific country. For
all the claims of a popular and successful intervention, the uprising
in Honiaras overcrowded Rove prisonthe Solomons
main jailhighlights the suppression of basic legal and democratic
rights that has accompanied it.
Pivotal to the activities of the intervention force has been
the rounding up and jailing of hundreds of so-called militants
and gang members, allegedly belonging to several militia that
fought for control of the impoverished state after its economy
began to disintegrate in 1998. Speaking at the anniversary ceremony
in Honiara, Australian Defence Minister Robert Hill boasted that
almost 3,000 arrests had been made and more than 3,700 guns seized.
Hundreds of those arrested have remained incarcerated for up
to 12 months and are still awaiting trial. Last week, Rove prison
held 216 such remand prisoners. They had been denied adequate
food, and many had been coerced into making confessions while
refused access to legal advice. Those designated as security risks
had been kept in solitary confinement for up to 23 hours a day.
Eighty or so prisoners broke out of their cells on the morning
of August 10, demanding an end to these intolerable conditions.
Prisoners reportedly overpowered two warders, seized their keys
and opened cell doors. They breached several prison walls and
reached the outer perimeter before Regional Assistance Mission
to the Solomon Islands (RAMSI) soldiers and police sealed off
the prison.
During the ensuing confrontation, stones were allegedly thrown
at police cameramen, with prisoners climbing onto a cell block
roof, demanding to see senior government figures. A police spokesman
conceded that the prisoners did not attempt to escape but vented
their frustration at their inhuman treatment. Nevertheless,
authorities stoked fears of a mass breakout, ordering the evacuation
of the neighbouring area, including the removal of students from
a local school and kindergarten.
RAMSI commanders assumed direct control over the prison, replacing
the local police and warders, but were not able to restore order
until 7 pm, when inmates reportedly surrendered. Police media
officer John Selwyn Tiaro denied that tear gas and other force
was used, but announced that all prisoners had been handcuffed
to prevent any further resistance.
Local police officers told reporters that anti-intervention
slogans were painted inside the prison. Some prisoners were heard
shouting slogans calling for the withdrawal of RAMSI. Inmates
alleged that RAMSI officials had used threats and offers of immunity
or bail to coerce prisoners into making written statements implicating
themselves and others in crimes ranging from murder to extortion.
In a petition, they called for the holding of reconciliation ceremonies,
the granting of pardons and the abolition of immunity from prosecution
for members of the intervention force.
After the protest was suppressed, prisoners sent a petition
to Police and National Security Minister Michael Maina alleging
reckless and violent behaviour by RAMSI officers. RAMSI police
commander Sandy Peisley, however, flatly denied that prisoners
were mistreated; baldly asserting that order was restored by negotiation.
The next day, in an attempt to defuse the situation, the countrys
High Court granted a number of orders sought by the inmates. It
declared that the segregation of high security risk
prisoners was illegal and unreasonable, that the prison management
plan was improper and that the food rations failed to meet minimum
standards.
The court condemned the poor rations, including the prison
services refusal to provide 7 grams of milk a day as unlawful.
It also ruled that the decisions to provide only a 40-gram navy
biscuit packet each morning, and not to provide curry and salt
as required, were in breach of regulations.
Despite maintaining that isolation cells are necessary for
security reasons, Australian officials sought to wipe their hands
of the appalling conditions, claiming that it was a matter for
the prison authorities. Yet, the man in charge of the jail, Commissioner
of Prisons Phil Norris, is an employee of GRM International, a
company owned by Australian media and gambling magnate Kerry Packer.
GRM, which holds a $30 million contract from the Australian Agency
for International Development (AusAID) to manage the countrys
prison system, appointed Norris to the post earlier this year.
Norris appointment typifies the way in which the Howard
government, and well-placed corporate interests, have installed
senior officials in the Solomon Islands administration, turning
the country into a semi-colony. Australian officials and consultants
have taken key posts in the police force, judicial administration
and finance ministry.
While the Howard government portrayed last years intervention
as a humanitarian effortdubbed Operation Helpim Fren (Helping
Friend)it formed part of an aggressive shift in foreign
policy in the wake of the Iraq war. It signalled the use of military
and economic muscle to trample over national sovereignty in order
to reinforce Australian strategic and commercial dominance over
the southwest Pacific.
RAMSIs neo-colonial character was underscored by the
response of New Zealand Foreign Minister Phil Goff to the prison
riot. The New Zealand Labour government has acted as Canberras
deputy in the intervention, contributing troops and police personnel
to secure its own interests in the region. Goff said the disturbance
showed how important it was to continue the presence of a RAMSI
military componentsome 500 troops still remainand
for security to be strengthened to deal with ongoing problems
inside the prison. He insisted that the prisoners demands
for pardons, reconciliation and the withdrawal of immunity for
RAMSI officers would not be met.
The tensions inside the prison reflect wider social discontent,
and mounting dissatisfaction with the economic agenda being pursued
by the RAMSI powers and its trampling on democratic rights. One
year after the intervention force arrived, virtually nothing has
been done to alleviate the poverty or improve the health, education
and social services of the Solomons half a million people,
who remain among the poorest in the world.
Instead, the central purpose of RAMSI has been to establish
law and order as a precondition for corporate investment
to exploit the islands natural resources, plantations, potential
tourism development and other market opportunities. In a speech
on RAMSIs first anniversary, Australian Foreign Minister
Alexander Downer emphasised the necessity to remove all obstacles
to the creation of a robust private sector in the
Solomons.
Downer asserted that the small countrys economy had failed
because of government domination of potentially profitable
activities. Breaking this grip, privatising services and providing
a stable environment for private business were fundamental,
he insisted.
His declaration simply ignored the legacy of decades of British
control over the islands before they were formally declared independent
in 1978. Moreover, Canberra has directly contributed to the economic
and social crisis in the Solomon Islands by repeatedly insisting
that the country slash public sector jobs and services or face
a cutoff of Australian and overseas aid.
Downer demanded that this free market program be intensified.
He specifically stipulated the opening up to private business
of basic services such as telecommunications, electricity and
water, the abolition of communal land tenure, and the removal
of cumbersome investment regulations, accompanied
by labour market deregulation to lower workers wages and
conditions. He launched a report by his department, Solomon
Islands: Rebuilding an Island Economy, which lays down a virtual
blueprint for a dramatic economic restructuring along these lines.
This plan will have devastating consequences for the way of
life of most Solomons people, which is based on village and communal
relations, kinship support and subsistence farming. It will fully
subject them to the dictates of global markets, as well as line
the pockets of Australian and New Zealand business consultants
and entrepreneurs. Such conditions will inevitably deepen the
social misery of the population and generate growing resentment
against the Australian-led neo-colonial intervention.
See Also:
An exchange on the Australian
intervention in the Solomon Islands
[31 March 2004]
Australia's richest man profits
from Solomon Islands intervention
[3 March 2004]
Pacific Islanders
to be used as cheap labour
Australian government prepares to revive blackbirding
[3 November 2003]
Australian officials
take control in the Solomon Islands
[27 August 2003]
Oppose Australias
colonial-style intervention in the Solomons
[3 July 2003]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |