|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
California death row inmate granted stay of execution
By Kate Randall
10 February 2004
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
Only hours before he was scheduled to be put to death at 12:01
Tuesday morning, California death row inmate Kevin Cooper was
granted a stay of execution by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
On Sunday, a three-member panel of the 9th Circuit had rejected
a request by defense attorneys to rehear Coopers case. In
the Monday ruling, the court said an 11-judge panel would take
the case, and granted a stay pending that ruling.
In his first death penalty case, new California governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger rejected Coopers appeal for clemency January
30, saying he saw no reason to question Coopers guilt.
Kevin Cooper, now 46, was convicted and sentenced to death
in 1985 for the brutal hacking deaths of four people in San Bernardino
County in June 1983. He has consistently maintained his innocence.
The victims in the case were Douglas and Peggy Ryen, their 10-year-old
daughter Jessica, and 11-year-old Christopher Hughes, a houseguest.
Josh Ryen, eight years old at the time, survived the attack despite
severe injuries.
Cooper was convicted of burglary in Los Angeles in January
1983, and was placed in a minimum-security area of the California
Institution for Men in Chino. He escaped on June 2, 1983. Three
days later the bodies were found in the Ryens home, which
was within view of an empty house where Cooper later admitted
hiding. At trial, Cooper insisted that he headed for Mexico after
escaping from the Chino facility, and was nowhere near the crime
scene. The case has been mired in controversy for years, with
Cooper and his defense insisting that key evidence that could
prove his innocence be examined.
Rallies supporting Cooper have been held across the state calling
for the execution to be stopped. Full-page newspaper ads asking,
Does the state of California have the wrong man? have
been signed by death penalty opponents, entertainers, labor union
leaders, nine members of the European Parliament and 12 California
legislators. At least five of the twelve jurors in Coopers
case oppose the execution.
DNA tests were not available in 1983, but in 2002 a new law
mandated that they be conducted. Coopers lawyers have challenged
the results of those tests, which prosecutors said confirmed that
Coopers blood was on a wall in the Ryen home, and also linked
him to two cigarette butts found in the familys station
wagon and a T-shirt found by the roadside that also contained
the victims blood.
Defense attorneys argue that the T-shirt was in the courts
custody from the time of the 1985 trial, and could have been tampered
with by the police or prosecution, who had the shirt and Coopers
blood before the trial. The cigarette butts also did not turn
up in an initial police search of the car, and one of them could
have been contaminated by a criminologist who had custody of one
of them for a full day in 1999.
The defense wants the T-shirt and other evidence tested for
a preservative used when Coopers blood was drawn. If present,
it would show that their clients DNA was placed on the objects
after his arrest, they contend. They also want tests conducted
on blond hairs found in one of Jessica Ryens hands.
Coopers lawyers also say that evidence never heard by
the jury could have influenced the verdict, including:
* an alleged confession of Vacaville prison inmate Kenneth
Koon, made to another inmate, which Koon subsequently denied;
* a statement by Diana Roper, who lived 40 miles from the scene
of the crime, that her boyfriend brought home a pair of blood-stained
coveralls that she believed were connected to the murders. A sheriffs
officer destroyed the coveralls without testing them.
The defense also argues that the prosecution coached Josh Ryen.
Ryen, now 29, said the 2002 DNA tests convinced him that Cooper
was guilty. But at trial he testified via videotape that he had
little recollection of the events of the crime. While he recounted
seeing only one dark figure during the attack, a hospital worker
who treated the young boy told the jury that Ryen said he had
been chased in the home by multiple assailants.
Coopers attorneys wrote in their brief: Far too
many questions cannot be answered, far too many holes cannot be
accounted for, far too many discrepancies cannot be resolved....
There is no good served by risking execution of an innocent man.
In a related development in the case, a federal judge in California
on February 6 rejected a challenge by Coopers defense that
use of one of the chemicals in California executions constitutes
cruel and unusual punishment. Pancuronium bromide paralyzes the
skeletal muscles while leaving the brain and nervous system unaffected,
meaning a person injected with the substance could remain awake
as he or she suffocates, but could not move or speak. The chemical
has been banned by veterinarians in several states for use in
animal euthanasia, but is still used in the execution of human
beings by lethal injection in at least 30 states.
Kevin Coopers execution would have been the first in
the state in two years. Since the US Supreme Court reinstated
the death penalty in 1976, California has sent 10 people to their
deaths, the lowest number for any state that practices capital
punishment.
Since the US reinstated the death penalty, 895 men and women
have been executed nationwide. These have included foreign nationals,
women, the mentally ill and retarded, and individuals convicted
for crimes committed when they were juveniles. Ten death row inmates
have been executed so far this year and 65 were put to death in
2003.
See Also:
Arkansas: Mentally ill inmate
put to death
Medical "treatment" prepares execution
[8 January 2004]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |