|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Will Vice President Cheney be indictedand will the US
media report it?
By Patrick Martin
28 January 2004
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
A French investigation into $180 million in bribes paid by
oil companies to government officials in Nigeria threatens to
implicate US Vice President Richard Cheney, according to reports
in the French and British press. The conservative French daily
newspaper Le Figaro wrote last month that the Paris
court contemplates an eventual indictment of the present United
States vice president, Richard Cheney, in his capacity as
former CEO of Halliburton.
The American media, however, has been all but silent on the
subject. The first reference to appear in a major US daily occupied
all of nine brief paragraphs in the Washington Post January
21. The newspaper buried on page A23 a report that the second
highest official in the US government was under investigation
for authorizing bribes. The Post article made no mention
of any possible indictment of Cheney, only noting that the bribes
were allegedly paid while he was Halliburtons chief executive,
from 1995 to 2000.
The case arises from the awarding of a multi-billion-dollar
contract to build a new natural gas production facility on Bonny
Island in the eastern part of the Niger River delta. The contract
was won by a four-nation consortium headed by Kellogg, Brown &
Root (KBR), Halliburtons construction arm. Its partners
were Technip of France, the Italian firm Snamprogetti, and JGC
of Japan.
The four construction firms were to build a huge gas liquefaction
factory, one of the largest in the world, and other related facilities,
for a consortium of four oil companies: the Nigerian National
Oil Company, which owns 49 percent of the venture; Shell, which
owns 25.6 percent; Total-Fina-Elf of France; which owns 15 percent;
and Agip International of Italy, which owns 10.4 percent. The
$6 billion project was run by a joint venture given the title
TSKJ, from the initials of the four construction companies.
French authorities began a bribery investigation in October,
2002, probing reports that $180 million (3 percent of the value
of the contract) had been paid from TSKJ between 1995 and 2001
to a shell company in the Madeira Islands. This money was then
funneled through a series of bank accounts in Gibraltar, Switzerland
and Monaco, all controlled by a London lawyer who had performed
no work for the project. Enough evidence was developed to warrant
assigning the case to a special anti-corruption investigating
judge, Renaud Van Ruymbeke, in June 2003. He opened a formal criminal
probe in October, 2003.
The circumstances of the payments suggest that they were originally
directed to the late Nigerian dictator Sani Abacha, who died suddenly
in 1998. (The funds were abruptly shifted from Switzerland to
Monaco after a Swiss judicial proceeding began into Abachas
assets there.) It is not clear who actually controls the funds
now. Such payments are illegal under a 1997 convention barring
bribery of foreign public officials in commercial negotiations,
adopted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD), the 35-nation club of wealthy countries to which the United
States belongs.
According to the account in Le Figaro, Kellogg, Brown
& Root could be charged with paying bribes, but Cheney would
not, because the kickbacks may not have been received until after
he left Halliburton in 2000. Because the complex web of financial
intermediaries was set up beginning in 1995, however, Judge Van
Ruymbeke is contemplating bringing charges of misuse of funds,
a separate offense under French law.
While the bribery probe is the first of its kind in France
under the convention on cross-border corruption, it is the outcome
of a lengthy investigation into the French oil giant Elf Aquitaine
(now part of Total-Fina-Elf), which has implicated many former
executives and high French government officials.
The French investigation into Halliburton, KBR and Cheney sheds
further light on the tense relations between the United States
and France, which were inflamed by the unilateral US decision
to go to war with Iraq, as well as the Bush administrations
exclusion of French firms from bidding for prime contracts for
rebuilding the devastated country.
Apparently, KBR conducted itself just as arrogantly in Nigeria
as the Bush administration has in Iraq. Technip, the French junior
partner in the construction consortium, objected to the methods
used to pay off Nigerian officials, but KBR ignored its complaints,
according to press reports.
Both Daniel Burlin, the former Technip finance director, and
Jean Desseilligny, the current general manager, have, in statements
given to the investigation, placed all responsibility on the American
company, which was the lead partner and initiated the payments.
Their account is bolstered by Halliburtons increasingly
notorious record as a corporate lawbreaker. Only eight months
ago, Halliburton filed documents with federal regulatory agencies
in the US revealing that it had paid $2.4 million in bribes to
a Nigerian tax official to get favorable treatment. Halliburton
fired several lower-level employees and claimed no senior officers
were involved.
In Iraq, Halliburton allegedly overcharged the US military
$61 million on contracts for delivering fuel. And last week, the
company revealed that several of its employees received kickbacks
from a Kuwaiti subcontractor to ignore a separate instance of
overbilling in a contract for the US Army Corps of Engineers.
Halliburton sent a check for $6.3 million to the US Army Materiel
Command to refund that overcharge.
According to Le Figaro, Dan Etete, former Nigerian oil
minister under the Abacha dictatorship, was questioned last month
as a state witness and explained that Shell and KBR were the companies
in overall control of the project, the first in charge of gas
exploitation, the other of industrial development. Etete, who
said he feared for his life, said that Shell and KBR
had close and direct relationships with the dictatorship and did
not need the complex money-shuffling operation to pay off officials.
Press reports on his testimony suggested that some of the money
could have been diverted to the Republican Party in the United
States.
Meanwhile, Vice President Cheney has emerged from the shadows
and begun public appearances in connection with the Bush-Cheney
reelection campaign. During the week of January 17-18, he sat
for long interviews with the Los Angeles Times, USA Today
and the Washington Post, his first interviews with daily
newspapers in more than two years. Neither paper raised the issue
of the French court case or possible bribery charges. The Post
published a long front-page profile of Cheney January 26, noting
his sudden increased visibility, and, again, saying nothing of
the Nigerian bribery case.
Wire service reports on the investigation into Cheney have
been available for weeks from Agence France-Presse and the Associated
Press, and excerpts have appeared in such daily newspapers as
Newsday, the Dallas Morning News and even the ultra-right
Washington Times, controlled by the Reverend Sun Myung
Moon. But not a word has appeared in the New York Times,
nor has the subject been addressed in the nightly news broadcasts
of the major television networks.
It is worth contrasting their kid-glove treatment of Cheney
with the frenzy whipped up, especially by the New York Times
and the Washington Post, over the Whitewater investigation.
A 15-year-old real-estate deal, involving $150,000 of undeveloped
land in the Ozarks, in which no criminal acts were committed and
Bill and Hillary Clinton lost money, nonetheless became a cause
celebre in the American media. But there is virtually no media
interest in the ongoing probe into $180 million in bribes in which
the vice president of the United States may be directly implicated.
This is just one example of the systematic political vetting
of the news by the American mass media. Any development
that tends to expose or compound the crisis of the Bush administration,
and the political establishment as a whole, is routinely blacked
out or relegated to a footnote.
This media blackout, however, is becoming increasingly difficult
to maintain, as further investigations into bribery in Nigeria
unfold. Last Friday, for example, five former Nigerian government
officials, three of them former cabinet ministers, appeared in
court in Nigeria facing charges of taking more than $1 million
in bribes from SAGEMSA, a French electronics company. The five
include the labor minister, Husseini Akwanga, who was fired after
charges were brought, and former internal affairs ministers Sunday
Afolabi and Mahmud Shata.
The case was sparked by an incident last September, when British
officials at Londons Heathrow airport arrested a Nigerian
man, Chris Agidi, carrying a briefcase packed with $200,000 in
cash. Agidi, a lower-level civil servant, was apparently a courier
taking part of the payoffs overseas to deposit in foreign banks.
The Associated Press reported the Friday court appearance in
a dispatch that made reference to the French investigation into
Cheney and Halliburton. This was published in the Baltimore
Sun, that citys major daily newspaper, but there was
no coverage in the New York Times, the Washington Post,
or any of the television networks.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |