|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
Britain: Blairs claims on Iraqi mass graves refuted
By Elaine Gorton
30 July 2004
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
In November 2003, British Prime Minister Tony Bair said, of
Iraq, Weve already discovered, just so far, the remains
of 400,000 people in mass graves.
This oft-repeated claim has been challenged by the Observer
newspaper. A July 18 article reveals that the government massively
exaggerated the number of bodies found. Blair has, according to
the newspapers investigations, inflated the actual number
of bodies discovered by occupation forces tenfold. A spokesman
for the prime minister was forced to admit that the number of
bodies he had quoted as being found was untrue.
The Observer stated, Of 270 suspected grave sites
identified in the last year, 55 have now been examined, revealing,
according to the best estimates that the Observer has been
able to obtain, around 5,000 bodies.
It continued, While some sites have contained hundreds
of bodiesincluding a series around the town of Hilla and
another near the Saudi borderothers have contained no more
than a dozen.
The Observers sister paper, the Guardian,
delved deeper in to the story. An article by Brendan ONeill
stated that when I asked Joanna Levison of the US state
department how many bodies have been exhumed, she said: Through
official procedures? None.
This was confirmed by Jonathan Forrest, who is part of a team
that carried out the forensic tests on the gravesites in 2003.
Forrest told ONeill, I do not believe that any forensic
scientists have exhumed any bodies in Iraq at all.
With no official forensic evidence, how did Blair come up with
his figure of 400,000 bodies discovered in mass graves in Iraq?
ONeill writes, Forrest believes that he might,
inadvertently, have played a part in giving prominence to this
figure. He says journalists in Iraq constantly asked his team
how many were in the graves. So we adopted the Human Rights
Watch figure of 290,000, and rounded it up to 300,000.
This was already a dubious figure. The paper revealed that
the HRWs figure is an estimate for the number of Iraqis
who disappeared under the Baathists, many of whom
are believed to have been killednot for the number
buried in mass graves.
The reality is that the figure is an estimate of an estimate,
not even based on bodies in graves, that was rounded upafter
which another 100,000 was added by Blair.
Even this was not enough. As ONeill points out, in a
press conference with a senior US official on November 20, a journalist
asked about Blairs claim that 400,000 bodies had been exhumed.
The official replied, Weve seen numbers that are in
the hundreds of thousands. Its certainly absolutely at least
300,000 or more; it could be as high as ... 500,000.
The Baathist regime was brutal and there is no excuse
for minimising the political crimes it carried out against the
Iraqi people. But the Western powers, which for years backed Saddam
Hussein, share direct responsibility for these crimes.
ONeill correctly notes regarding the HRW estimate of
300,000 Iraqis killed by the Baathists: According
to the US state department, most of the graves discovered to date
correspond to five major atrocities committed by the Saddam Hussein
regime: the 1983 attack against Kurds of the Barzani tribe; the
1988 Anfal campaign against the Kurds, for which estimates of
the numbers killed vary from 50,000 to 180,000; chemical attacks
against Kurdish villages from 1986 to 1988; the 1991 massacre
of Shia Muslims during their uprising at the end of the Gulf war;
and the 1991 massacre of Kurds who fought for autonomy in northern
Iraq after the Gulf war.
The offensive against the Kurds in the 1980s took place during
the Iran-Iraq war, in which the US supported and armed Iraq. The
suppression of a Kurdish uprising in the north that was supported
by Iran in 1988 was also given tacit support by Washington. And
again, the attack on the Shia Muslims in 1991 was carried out
to suppress an uprising that was encouraged and then abandoned
by the administration of Bush senior following the first Gulf
War.
Equally important, it is clear that turning 5,000 to 400,000
to half a million bodies was no simple slip of the pen. It served
a clear political purpose.
The focus on mass graves began under conditions where the claim
peddled by Blair and others that the world was immediately threatened
by Saddam Husseins possession of weapons of mass destruction
was discredited. And in order to legitimise the war at a time
when the United States was in the process of consolidating its
own puppet regime, the emphasis of propaganda emanating from Washington
and London shifted to the benefits of regime change
for the Iraqi people.
The existence of 400,000 bodies in mass graves gave Blair and
President George W. Bush a moral imperative for war. It allowed
the Baathist regime to be equated with other perpetrators
of genocidal crimes. The USAID website stated, If these
numbers prove accurate, they represent a crime against humanity
surpassed only by the Rwandan genocide of 1994, Pol Pots
Cambodian killing fields in the 1970s, and the Nazi Holocaust
of World War II.
Blairs public declarations followed this template. If
this number of bodies had been unearthed, was it not his moral
duty to change this brutal regime? Indeed, if the UK and US, along
with their coalition partners, had not acted then they would have
been turning a blind eye to a crime against humanitya position
that was by implication attributed to those opposed to war.
The only trouble is, like the weapons of mass destruction,
the bodies are simply not there.
Such lies and exaggerations have become the stock-in-trade
of the Western powers in seeking to legitimise their own crimes.
As the World Socialist Web Site pointed out in a November
9, 1999 article, Investigations belie NATO claims of ethnic
genocide in Kosovo:
During the conflict, the NATO powers asserted that somewhere
between 100,000 (according to US Defence Secretary William Cohen)
and 500,000 (according to an April 1999 statement of the US State
Department) Albanian Kosovars had been killed by Serb forces...
But now the much-reduced official estimate of 10,000 Kosovar deaths
has been discredited by the results of investigations carried
out by the Hague war crimes tribunal and other agencies. Most
post-war surveys estimate the actual number of deaths attributable
to Serbian forces at less than 2,500.
At the time, Serbian ethnic cleansing operations were also
compared with the Nazi death camps. And NATO and its ally, the
Kosovo Liberation Army, claimed that as many as 1,000 bodies a
day had been dropped down mine shafts at Trepca, incinerated or
dissolved in hydrochloric acid. In the aftermath of the war, however,
investigators surveying the mine complex have found no evidence
of executions.
A Spanish team investigating one zone in Kosovo found no mass
graves and only 187 bodies, all buried in individual graves. One
team member, Emilio Perez Pujol, said, There never was a
genocide in Kosovo. It was dishonest and wrong for Western leaders
to adopt the term in the beginning to give moral authority to
the operation.
In Iraq, as in Kosovo, when the dust of war begins to settle,
stubborn and more sobering facts about scale of deaths at the
hands of those targeted by the Western powers emerges. Once again
Washington and London have been revealed as having mounted a systematic
and deliberate campaign of lies in order to justify their wars
of aggression, while the bulk of the media was more than willing
to act as a conduit for these lies.
See Also:
Britain: Blair knew claims on Iraqi WMDs
were dubious
[17 July 2004]
BBC vindicated on charge that government
sexed-up Iraq dossier
[16 July 2004]
Butler Inquiry exonerates Blair government
on Iraq war lies
[15 July 2004]
Butler Inquiry into Iraq intelligence:
Blair prepares another whitewash
[5 February 2004]
Hutton Inquiry: A black day
for democracy in Britain
[3 February 2004]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |