|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Spain
Spain seeks to extend its influence in North Africa
By Paul Bond
31 July 2004
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The Spanish government of Jose Luis Zapatero has lost little
time in stressing again its role as a key diplomatic player in
North Africa, following the resignation last month of James Baker,
the United Nations secretary generals personal envoy to
Western Sahara.
Foreign Minister Miguel Moratinos visited Algiers in May. Zapatero
himself travelled to the Moroccan capital, Rabat, soon after his
election, and is talking of a trip to the Tunisian capital, Tunis,
in the near future. In the last two weeks, Zapatero has led a
high-level delegation to Algiers, which included Moratinos and
Industry Trade and Tourism Minister Jose Montilla. Once again,
the conflict in Western Sahara was discussed.
Zapateros Socialist Workers Party of Spain (PSOE) has
distanced itself from the pro-American line of its predecessor
in government, the reviled Popular Party (PP) of Jose Maria Aznar,
by seeking closer ties with other European powers. This is deepening
political divisions over the strategically vital Maghreb.
Spain has long been a pivotal power in the region. It retains
its enclaves in Morocco, Ceuta and Melilla, and has a long colonial
history in the area. In concert with the other main former colonial
power in the region, France, it is seeking to reassert its influence.
The conflict in Western Sahara has its roots in resistance
to Spanish colonial rule. The Polisario Front was established
in 1973 as the military wing of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic
(SADR) to fight the Spanish. When Spain withdrew from the region
in 1976, the territory was annexed by Mauritania and Morocco.
Mauritania withdrew in 1979, but Polisario fought Moroccan occupation
for 16 years. There is a general view within Moroccan politics
that Western Sahara is part of its national territory.
In 1991, the UN brokered a ceasefire. It put a peacekeeping
forceMINURSOinto the territory, with the stated long-term
aim of achieving a referendum on the future status of the region.
But, bogged down in disputes over voting rights, the referendum
was continually deferred.
Baker was appointed by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan in 1997.
His proposal, which was finally accepted by the UN Security Council
and the Algerian-backed Polisario in 2003, was that Western Sahara
should be a semi-autonomous region of Morocco for five years,
to be followed by a referendum on the status of the territory.
Baker had talked of the viability of an independent Western Sahara,
but his proposal was geared towards ensuring the stability of
the region under American domination.
Morocco is a favoured state of the United States, which sees
it as a useful counterweight to growing hostility across the Arab
world. The US was keen to ensure its stability, as well as reserve
access rights to Western Saharas potential mineral and oil
resources. (Morocco had already issued licences to oil companies
to explore off the coast, and the US has troops stationed in the
area south of Algeria and Morocco.) Bakers proposal, though,
was ultimately rejected by Morocco, which insisted there could
be no option of eventual sovereignty for the region. Frustration
at this position led to Bakers resignation.
Zapatero has made it clear that he is not pursuing the same
tactical line as Baker, although he is motivated by the same concerns
for stability. After meeting Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika,
Zapatero said he did not want to be bound by any plan be
it called Baker or not. Instead, he proposed direct negotiations
between Algiers and Rabat. Any proposal, he said, will be
effective only if it meets with the agreement of all parties involved.
He called for the UN to explore all the available options.
This appeal to direct negotiations brings Zapatero into line
with Paris. French Foreign Minister Michel Barnier, who was in
Algiers at the same time as Zapatero, said dialogue between Algeria
and Morocco was essential and very useful. Miguel
Moratinos insisted that Paris and Madrid should pursue the same
line on North Africa.
Zapateros comments were welcomed by the Moroccan press:
Aujourdhui le Maroc praised him for having the
courage to give up the policy of neutrality adopted by [his] predecessors
during the last 30 years. The paper insisted that his proposals
could only succeed with a change in Madrids line and suggested
that Zapateros concern was for the strengthening of a Maghreban
economic unit.
This is the line being pursued by the PSOE. Miguel Moratinos
shares Bakers concerns over instability in the region. He
argued that a referendum without a political solution might
lead us to a situation of generalised crisis in North Africa.
The UN had no real intention of confronting Moroccos
domination of Western Sahara. Moratinos effectively stated this
explicitly with his comment that it was impossible to tell how
Morocco would react in a referendum. Would the Moroccan
armed forces accept being defeated in a referendum? he asked.
When the United Left criticised the government for ignoring
the rights of the Sahrawis, Moratinos was at pains to say that
they were not ruling out the idea of a referendum. He promised
that they would not betray the legitimate rights of the Sahrawis.
This has not impressed SADR, which has denounced this Paris-Madrid-Rabat
axis.
Moratinos, though, has made clear the need for a political
solution to stabilise North Africa. Rejecting the neutral
and somehow hypocritical line of previous Spanish governments,
he said Madrids options were to refer to the UN and
hide as before, or roll up its sleeves and get down
to work.
The economic unity of the Maghreb is the chosen vehicle for
implementing this stability. Bernardino Leon, the secretary of
state for foreign affairs, said earlier this month that a settlement
of the Western Sahara dispute would tend towards the integration
of the Maghreb and would improve political and economic relations,
particularly if Algeria and Morocco were to reopen their borders.
(They were closed in 1994, after a bomb was planted in Marrakech
by Algerian nationals.) Leon pledged that Spain would contribute
positively to this process of integration.
The Maghreb Arab Union (UMA), set up in 1989 by Algeria, Libya,
Mauritania, Morocco and Tunisia, has been a moribund organisation
for many years, partly as a result of this conflict. Leon stressed
the need for solid relations between the countries
of the Maghreb, rather than conjunctural alliances. This has met
a favourable response within Morocco. Interior Minister Mostafa
Sahel last week visited Algiers, where he discussed reopening
the border and deepening relations between the countries. Sahel
argued that a united Maghreb was a viable regional structure for
negotiating directly with transnational corporations.
Spain is concerned directly with safeguarding its own interests.
The Maghreb-Europe Gas Pipeline, which links the Hass Rmel
oilfield in Algeria with Cordoba, meets nearly 60 percent of Spains
natural gas requirements. The pipeline passes through Morocco.
There are also plans to build another pipeline from Beni Saf
to Almeria. Work is due to begin on the pipeline, with a projected
capacity of 4 billion cubic metres per annum, later this year,
to be operational in 2007. Algerian Energy Minister Chakib Khelil
has also talked of plans to link the Spanish and Algerian national
grids via submarine cables.
Trade between Spain and Algeria last year was worth 3 billion
euros ($3.7 billion), and many Spanish companies are moving south
across the Mediterranean. In Algiers at the same time as Zapateros
party was a large delegation of Spanish businessmen, particularly
from the building and energy industries.
See Also:
Spain: Socialist Party government to
send troops to Afghanistan and Haiti
[24 July 2004]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |