|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
Australia: Workers First union leader plea bargains for suspended
sentence
By Laura Tiernan and Terry Cook
28 June 2004
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
Last month, former Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU)
Victorian state secretary Craig Johnston pleaded guilty in the
Melbourne County Court to charges of affray, criminal damage and
verbal assault. A much more serious charge of threat to
kill was eventually dropped after the former union leader
literally threw himself at the mercy of the court and entered
a behind-the-scenes plea-bargaining deal. Johnston received a
one-year suspended sentence and was fined more than $50,000. If
he re-offends during the next three years he can be sent immediately
to jail.
The extensive charges arose from a union protest stunt organised
by Johnston during a dispute in June 2001. Some 29 workers had
been callously sacked at Johnson Tiles in Melbourne and replaced
with casual labour.
In the course of the dispute, neither Johnston nor any of his
fellow bureaucrats attempted to mobilise a broad-based campaign
against the sackings, although the basis for one certainly existed.
Instead, he led a number of union officials and members in a run
through of the premises of Johnson Tiles and of the labour-hire
company, Skilled Engineering, overturning and damaging factory
and office equipment.
Some months later, six union officials were charged with riot,
affray, aggravated burglary, criminal damage and unlawful assembly
over the incident at Skilled Engineering. The following year,
12 unionists were similarly charged over the Johnson Tiles run
through. Subsequent plea-bargaining saw all chargesexcept
unlawful assemblydropped against the other defendants. However,
the serious charges against Johnston, carrying a maximum 25 years
jail, remained.
On the day of Johnstons sentencing an estimated 8,000
workers gathered outside the court in response to a call by his
support group to rally and demand the dropping of all charges.
Many of these workers had defied threats of disciplinary action
by their employers to attend and most would not have been aware
of the plea-bargaining that had already taken place.
Addressing the gathering after his sentencing, Johnston tried
to present the outcomea lighter than expected sentenceas
a victory for the cause of fighting for workers and the
rank and file and a victory for militant unionism.
His claim is utterly preposterous.
In reality, Johnstons sentencing marks the final stage
in an almost three-year long offensive by sections of the manufacturing
employers and the National Council of the Australian Manufacturing
Workers Union (AMWU) to bust-up the Workers First (WF) faction
in the unions Victorian branch. Presenting itself as a militant
alternative to the openly class collaborationist AMWU national
leadership, and its cohorts in the Victorian state apparatus,
WF was able to capture prominent positions in the state branch
in 1998. Johnston, the factions principal leader, won the
position of state secretary.
While Johnston and other WF officials at no time advanced any
genuine alternative to the national leadership, they did win the
support of thousands of discontented and disgruntled workers in
key sectors of Victorias manufacturing industry. These workers
had turned to WF looking for a vehicle to fight the employers
onslaught on their conditions and to combat the decades-long betrayals
of the unions nation leadershipwhich had led to the
wholesale destruction of jobs and working conditions.
Powerful sections of employers and investors, along with Victorian
Labor State Premier Steve Bracks, concerned at the turn of events,
urged the AMWU national leadership to take action. In response,
the union launched a witchhunt against WF. Johnston was hauled
before an internal union inquiry on charges of gross misconduct
and suspended as Victorian AMWU state secretary.
Within this context, the run through stunt at Johnson
Tiles and Skilled Engineering was a gift to the employers and
the AMWU national leadership. It opened the road for legal action
against Johnston and his supporters, while at the same time disorienting
sections of AMWU members who, although they opposed the unprincipled
operation by Cameron, rejected WFs mindless radical tactics.
Johnstons antics did nothing to advance the fight against
the sackings. In the final analysis, they constituted a desperate
attempt on the part of WF to bolster its flagging reputation as
a militant alternative to the Cameron leadership. The factions
standing had waned considerably following the miserable outcome
of a series of enterprise bargaining campaigns for new work contracts.
The effect of the campaigns was to maintain the division of manufacturing
workers on an enterprise-by-enterprise basis, deliver low wage
outcomes and continue the trend of trading off working conditions.
Moreover, they failed to challenge the drive to casualisation.
Johnston and WF consciously avoided making a broad class appeal
over the dispute at Johnson Tiles because they feared any campaign
against casualisation would win a widespread response throughout
the working class that could rapidly get out of their control.
Employers campaign succeeds
Johnstons sentencing last month marked the final disciplining
of Worker First. It was designed to send a clear message to all
manufacturing workers that not even the slightest opposition to
the employers agenda would be tolerated. And it is indisputable
that the operation against WF has succeeded.
In late 2002, Johnston bowed before the demands of the National
Council and resigned his union position. At the same time, all
those union officials who once claimed adherence to the WF faction
have now made their peace with the AMWU national leadership and
are actively carrying out its agenda. In fact, despite promising
their supporters that WF would contest the position of state secretary,
its officials agreed to accept AMWU National Council nominee Dave
Oliver in exchange for keeping their positions in the union apparatus.
Victorias Chamber of Commerce and Industry head Neil
Coulsen recently expressed the employers satisfaction with
Johnstons sentence. Speaking to the Australian Broadcasting
Corporation, he said the result sent a very clear message
to unions that if they wanted to negotiate with employers
they have to behave according to certain standards.
In other words, union officials must unconditionally accept corporate
dictates, and impose them on their memberships, if they wish to
remain in the loop.
The abject capitulation of Workers First to the campaign waged
against it, despite the fact that it held key union positions
and had considerable rank and file support, demonstrates yet again
the bankruptcy of a perspective based on narrow trade union politics,
no matter how militant its adherents may claim to be.
WFs response, rather than politically educating the workers
about the real nature of the struggle they confronted, has only
served to disorient and demoralise them, while strengthening the
hand of the employers, the government and the AMWU national leadership.
The World Socialist Web Site (WSWS) and the Socialist
Equality Party have unequivocally condemned the dirty operation
against Workers First and the cowardly and reprehensible intrigues
of Cameron and the national AMWU leadership. But we have also
continued to warn workers that, because WF shares the same fundamental
political perspective as its rivalsthe subordination of
its members to the framework dictated by the profit systemit
would prove incapable of mounting a serious defence of workers
rightsor even its own.
As WSWS has pointed out, WFs capitulation is not simply
the result of the cowardice or personal weaknesses of its leading
figures. It is rooted in the very nature of trade unions themselves,
whose principal function is to organise the sale of the labour
power of workers for wages and other concessions under prevailing
market conditions, and then to enforce the deals struck with employers.
But the globalisation of production, along with sweeping developments
in telecommunications and transport, has fundamentally changed
the conditions under which unions bargain. If companies dont
receive what they want, they can relocate production to areas
offering lower labor costs and bigger tax breaks.
These processes have undermined all national-based perspectives.
No longer can the unions squeeze concessions from the employers
through industrial or parliamentary pressure. Instead, they have
become transformed into agencies striving to continually lower
wages and conditions, thus enabling the employers to achieve international
competitiveness and maintain production in Australia.
This is why, on the basis of its nationalist outlook, WF could
mount no serious fight against casualisation. The turn to casual
and contract labor is itself driven by the need of corporations
in every part of the world to create a pool of cheap, flexible
labour, tied entirely to their immediate production needs. In
Australia, more than one in every four workers is now employed
as a casual, the second highest rate in the world after Spain.
A genuine struggle in defence of well-paid, secure jobs can
only be organised and sustained to the degree that workers consciously
identify themselves as part of an international class and recognise
that their interests are irreconcilably opposed to those of capital.
Above all else, an independent political movement of the working
class must be forged that fights for internationalism and the
complete reorganisation of society along truly socialist and egalitarian
lines.
See Also:
Australia: Critical lessons
from the tramway sackings in Melbourne
[27 May 2004]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |