|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : South
& Central America
US Marines occupy Haitian capital amid charges Aristide was
kidnapped
By Keith Jones
2 March 2004
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
Deposed Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide and his wife
have told several US Congressmen that US military personnel forced
him onto a plane and spirited him from the Caribbean-island state
as the final act in a US-sponsored coup against his government.
Representative Charles Rangel told CNN that Aristide had said
that he was kidnapped, that he resigned under pressure,
that he was taken to a Central African country against his
will. California Congresswoman Maxine Waters said Aristides
wife had said her husband had been forced to leave.
A US embassy official had told Haitis elected president
he had to go nowthat if he didnt go he would
be killed and a lot of Haitians would be killed.
Randall Robinson, former president of the liberal research
group TransAfrica, said Aristide had telephoned him to say that
he was being held under guard by French and African soldiers in
a presidential palace in the capital of the Central African Republic.
He asked that I tell the world that it is a coup, that he
was abducted by American soldiers and put aboard a plane.
These charges have been denied by top officials in the Bush
administration. Presidential spokesman Scott McClellan dismissed
them as nonsense and conspiracy theories.
Secretary of State Colin Powell, feigning hurt that he could be
accused of such criminal conduct, told reporters, He was
not kidnapped. We did not force him on the airplane. He went on
the plane willingly.
The denials of the Bush administration are unconvincing.
French radio station RTL broadcast an interview with a frightened
old man whom its correspondent came across when he visited
Aristides residence and who said he was Aristides
caretaker. He told RTL, The American army came to take [Aristide]
away at two in the morning ... The Americans forced him out with
weapons.
Mondays edition of the Montreal daily La Pressewhich
appeared before Aristides charges were levelled or at least
publicly knowncarried a report from its special correspondent
in Haiti, Marie-Claude Malboeuf. She says a source told her handcuffs
had had to be put on the ex-president of Haiti before he took
the threats of the diplomats demanding his resignation seriously.
Moreover, US officials had bluntly told Aristide that the US
military personnel deployed in Haiti would do nothing to protect
him, let alone his government, from the fascist gunmen poised
to invade Port-au-Prince. Colin Powell personally called Ron Dellums,
a former Congressman whom Aristide had hired to lobby on behalf
of the Haitian government, to tell him that the US would not guarantee
the Haitian presidents personal safety. And when guards
from Aristides security teamemployees of the San Francisco-based
Steele Foundation and themselves presumably ex-US military personnelcontacted
the US embassy in Port-au-Prince to ask if they could count on
American protection in the event of a rebel attack they were told,
no, they would have to fend for themselves.
A Bush administration that came to power through stealing of
the 2000 elections, dragged the American people into an illegal
war of conquest against Iraq with lies about weapons of mass destruction,
and is staffed at its highest levels by persons responsible for
countless imperialist outrages from authorizing mass bombings
in Vietnam to sponsoring death squads in Central America, is certainly
capable of kidnapping Haitis elected president. The Republican
Party establishment, which supported the military coup that deposed
Aristide in 1991 and opposed his restoration to power by the Clinton
administration in 1994, has never forgiven nor forgotten the defrocked
priests denunciations of US imperialismno matter that
when in power Aristide implemented IMF-dictated structural reforms.
But in the final analysis, whether Aristide caved in before
US bullying and threats and tendered his resignation or was press-ganged
onto a US military plane, does not change the fundamental nature
of what has taken place in Haiti: The Bush administration has
overthrown Haitis elected government. And it has done so
in league with a self-proclaimed political opposition dominated
by Haitis traditional elite and led by notorious henchmen
of the Duvalier and Cédras dictatorships and with a rebel
militia led by former officers of the disbanded Haitian army and
the FRAPH death squad.
That US marines and the fascist rebels simultaneously made
their entry into Port-au-Prince over the past two days only underscores
that they have been acting in concert.
As the fascist rebels swept across Haiti during the month of
February, the US, France and Canada insisted they would not intervene
in Haiti till Aristide reached a political settlement with the
opposition Democratic Platform. Yet they knew full well the opposition,
which they had helped organize and finance, was determined to
have the head of Aristide. When the opposition rejected a settlement
sponsored by the US and France that would have reduced Aristide
to a titular role, Washington and Paris placed the blame on Aristide
and started pressing for his resignation.
Once Aristide was deposed all obstacles to a US intervention
disappeared. Within hours of his departure, the first of a force
of Marines that could eventually number 2000 began occupying the
Port-au-Prince airport and the UN Security Council authorized
a US-led peacekeeping mission.
So incontrovertible is the evidence of the rebel leaders involvement
in bloody repression under various Haitian dictatorshipsthe
New York Times headlined a report Veterans of Past
Murderous Campaigns are Leading Haitis New Rebellionthat
US Secretary of State Powell has felt it necessary to say, without
providing any names, that some of the rebels are thugs
who should be excluded from a role in Haitian politics.
But there is no question that a deal is being prepared in which
the rebel force will be incorporated into Haitis government,
likely becoming the core of a revived army.
The Democratic Platform has rushed to embrace the rebels, who
are styling themselves the Front de libérationForces
armées dHaiti (Liberation FrontArmed Forces
of Haiti.) On Sunday Evans Paul, a former mayor of Port-au-Prince
and prominent opposition spokesman, told La Presse, We
have to improvise an emergency security system. I await Guy Philippe
(the principal rebel commander) for discussions. Meanwhile,
André Apaid, the US citizen and sweatshop owner who has
emerged as the principal opposition spokesman declared, The
rebels must be part of the solution, because they are Haitians
too.
On Monday leaders of the Democratic Platform met with rebel
leaders including Philippe, a US-trained former Haitian officer
who according to Human Rights Watch earned a reputation for brutality
while serving as a police chief and who in 2001 attempted to overthrow
Aristides government, and Louis-Jodel Chamblain, the co-founder
of the FRAPH death squad.
Emerging from the meeting, Paul again praised the rebels, in
particular Guy Philippe. Meanwhile, Chamblain told reporters to
he wanted to thank the US, France and Canada for allowing
us to get rid of Aristide. Chamblain added that he had no
fear of being called to account for his role as an organizer of
murder and terror under the Cédras dictatorship.
The meeting was preceded by a rebel rally that took place under
the watch of US Marines who were posted as guards at Haitis
presidential palace. According to US Colonel David Berger, head
of the US Marine contingent now deploying in Haiti, I have
no instructions to go about disarmament. The US and French
forces have set as their objective securing unspecified key
sites in Haitis capital, meaning the rebels have free
rein over most of Port-au-Prince.
Over the past two months, the international media has largely
served as a mouthpiece for the Democratic Platform, repeating
its grossly exaggerated claims about the level of irregularities
in the 2000 elections and ignoring the oppositions own,
far longer and notorious anti-democratic record and its willingness,
like its US sponsors, to join with fascists in toppling Haitis
elected president.
In keeping with this, most reports since Aristides fall
have focused on the celebrations in the elite and middle class
areas of Port-au-Prince. But Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
reporter Neil Macdonald admitted that in the slums of Haitis
capital the mood is sullen.
There also have been scattered, harrowing reports of a bloody
settling of accounts, directed perhaps in the first instance at
the armed-gangs that supported Aristide, the chimères,
but which have as their fundamental object reasserting the unfettered
domination of Haitis elite over the countrys largely
illiterate, impoverished and malnourished masses.
The Miami Herald quoted a business-owner armed with
a machine gun as saying, Basically, whoever is bringing
peace, were going to work with. There were widespread
killings with guns and machetes as the gangs, known as chimères,
tried to defend themselves against vengeance, reported Canwests
Sue Montgomery.
Among the first acts of the rebels on arriving in Port-au-Prince
was to release from prison a large number of former military personnel
held for their role in suppressing popular opposition to the Cédras
dictatorship or conspiring against the subsequent elected government.
The USs role in toppling an elected president by conniving
with, if not organizing, a rebellion led by fascist thugs has
drawn criticism from other Caribbean governments. No doubt they
fear the readiness of the regions great powersthe
US and Franceto brazenly violate traditional democratic
norms. Declared Jamaican prime minister and current CARICOM chairman
P.J. Patterson, The removal of President Aristide ... sets
a dangerous precedent for democratically elected governments anywhere
and everywhere, as it promotes the removal of duly elected persons
from office by the power of rebel forces.
Some sections of the US political establishment have also made
criticisms of the Bush administrations role in the events
in Haiti, but mainly from the standpoint that it should not let
France take the initiative in the crisis and out of concern that
further instability in Haiti could precipitate an exodus of poor
Haitians to the shores of Florida. The New York Times,
in what constituted an apologia for Bushs fomenting of a
fascist rebellion to effect regime change, criticized
the current administration for bad tactics. Mr. Bushs
hesitation [in deploying troops to Haiti] leaves Washington looking
as if it withheld the Marines until Mr. Aristide yielded power,
leaving Haitians at the mercy of some of the countrys most
vicious criminal gangs.
Bush, for his part, in a chilling display of his contempt for
democracy and disdain for the Haitian people declared Sunday,
once Aristide was driven from office and the US ambassador to
Haiti had presided over the swearing in of the head of the countrys
supreme court as the next president, that the Haitian constitution
is working. No less foul were the remarks of French Foreign
Minister Dominique de Villepin. He boasted that Aristides
departure had been the result of perfect co-ordination
between Washington and Paris.
See Also:
The overthrow of Haitis Aristide:
a coup made in the USA
[1 March 2004]
US and France target Haiti's
elected president for removal
[28 February 2004]
Does Haitis non-violent
opposition want a bloodbath in Port-au-Prince?
[26 February 2004]
Washington utilizes rightist
terror to effect regime change in Haiti
[25 February 2004]
Haiti: Washington gives greenlight
to right-wing coup
[23 February 2004]
An exchange on Haiti: Jean-Bertrand
Aristide and the dead end of left nationalist politics
[18 February 2004]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |