|
WSWS
: News &
Analysis : Middle
East : Iraq
US journalist who exposed Shiite death squads murdered in
Basra
By Patrick Martin
5 August 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
American journalist Steven Vincent was kidnapped and murdered
August 2 in Basra, the southern Iraqi city where he had been working
as a freelance writer and blogger. Suspicion for this killing,
the first of an American reporter in Iraq, focuses not on Al Qaeda
or Sunni-based insurgents, but on the police of the Shiite-based
administration installed in Basra with the support of US and British
occupation forces.
Vincent and his translator and assistant, Nour Weidi, were
seized Tuesday evening outside a currency exchange shop by five
men dressed in police uniforms and driving police cars. According
to a report in the Los Angeles Times, One witness,
who refused to give his name, said he recognized one of the abductors
as an Interior Ministry employeethat is, a functionary
of the US-backed puppet regime in Baghdad. The man also
recognized me, after I saluted him, the eyewitness told
the Times. He said to me: Do not interfere!
It is our duty.
A few hours later, the journalists body was found dumped
by a road outside the city, with multiple bullet wounds to the
head. He suffered bruises to his face and shoulder, had been blindfolded
and his hands were tied in front with plastic wire. Weidi was
seriously wounded but survived. She was taken to a local hospital.
On Sunday, July 31, Vincent received his widest media exposure
with an op-ed column in the New York Times describing the
takeover of the Basra police by Shiite militants, some loyal to
radical cleric Moqtada Sadr, others to the two main Shiite parties
which run the US-backed government in Baghdad.
He wrote, A police lieutenant confirmed for me the widespread
rumors that a few police officers are perpetrating many of the
hundreds of assassinationsmostly of former Baath Party membersthat
take place in Basra each month.... He told me that there is even
a sort of death car, a white Toyota Mark II that glides
through the city streets, carrying off-duty police officers in
the pay of extremist religious groups to their next assignment.
Two days after these words were published, a death car
came for Vincent himself.
Vincent was a freelance writer and professional art critic
living and working in New York City until the terrorist attacks
of September 11, 2001. After the US invasion and occupation of
Iraq, which he fervently supported, he decided to go to Iraq and
report on the conditions there and the progress of what he mistakenly
believed was an exercise in the establishment of democracy in
the Middle East. He wrote a book-length account of his experiences
in Iraq after the US invasion, In the Red Zone: A Journey Into
the Soul of Iraq, Spence Publishing, 2004, and was at work
on a contemporary history of Basra.
However misguided his faith in the democratizing mission of
American imperialism, Vincent was a man of some personal courage
and an honest observer of events, traveling without military escort
or bodyguards, his physical safety depending on using his wits
and his contacts among ordinary Iraqis. (He spoke no Arabic and
relied heavily on his unpaid translator, to whom he gave the pseudonym
Layla.)
His columns, mainly published in the right-wing National
Review Online, did not simply parrot Bush administration propaganda.
On December 15, 2004, for instance, under the headline, The
Oppressive Occupier? This Wasnt How the Liberation was Supposed
to Go, he related discussions with Iraqi men on the streets
of Fallujah and Ramadi, two cities which have been the focal point
of opposition to the US occupation. (Vincent posed as a Yugoslav
journalist and was promptly deluged with complaints, whose gist
was America bad, worse than Saddam.)
It was painful to see America the object of so much hatred
and fear, the very image of an oppressive occupier, he wrote.
It was worse when we found ourselves behind a trio of Humvees
... and I looked at the GI manning the roof-mounted m60 machine
gun (Where was he from? What city? Where did his parents live?),
reflecting on the isolation of these young men out here, how the
Iraqis shun and avoid them, even as they face the threat that
a roadside pile of debris will erupt into fire and shrapnel. This
was not how the liberation was supposed to go.
Vincent spent the bulk of his time in Iraq reporting from Basra,
supposedly a quieter and more secure location than Baghdad or
the Sunni Triangle, without the constant terrorist attacks and
gun battles between US troops and insurgents. He came to regard
the Shiite organizations, particularly that of Moqtada Sadr but
also the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq (Sciri),
one of the two main parties in power in Baghdad, as reactionary
and violently antidemocratic.
Writing in the Christian Science Monitor July 13, he
described how militias linked to these Shiite parties had attacked
students, harassed women deemed in violation of strict Islamic
codes of conduct, threatened local journalists, and carried out
the political assassination of as many as 1,000 people, mainly
Sunni Muslims, in a three-month period. He criticized the British
military, the ultimate authority in Basra, for not cracking down
on these activities.
An editors note appended to this article explained why
all of Vincents Basra sources had remained anonymous: The
Iraqis Steven interviewed said that the climate of fear is worse
than under Saddam Hussein.
Writing for his own blog two weeks later, July 26 (a week before
his death), Vincent described the rampant corruption in the city:
Not surprisingly, given Basras dilapidated condition,
contracting is big business. Not only for the citys numerous
contractors, but also for the crooked politicians, parasitical
religious parties and criminal gangs who take their cut from every
construction job, creating a business climate that combines the
accountability of Tammany Hall with the law and order of 1920s
Chicago.
After relating a conversation with an American officer charged
with awarding reconstruction contracts, who was completely oblivious
to the political conditions in the city, he ended with this pessimistic
note: Not for the first time, I felt I was living in a Graham
Greene novel, this time about a US soldiercall it The Naive
Americanwho finds what works so well in PowerPoint presentations
has unpredictable results when applied to realities of Iraq. Or
is that the story of our whole attempt to liberate this nation?
This tragedy bears certain similarities to the 2002 murder
of another American journalist, Wall Street Journal reporter
Daniel Pearl, in Pakistan. Like Vincent, Pearl stepped into the
hornets nest created by US military intervention in the
region and paid the price with his life, murdered by Islamic fundamentalists.
There are contradictions piled upon contradictions in the case
of Steven Vincent. He denounced all armed resistance to the US
occupation of Iraq as the work of Islamo-fascism and
right-wing death squads, and, according to the New
York Times, even compared his trips to Iraq to the tours
taken by journalists covering the rise of fascism in Europe during
the Spanish Civil War.
Yet his writings were published in a reactionary publication,
National Review, founded by William F. Buckley and other
arch-conservatives who had sympathized with the fascist side in
the Spanish Civil War (on the basis of anti-communism), and which
served as an apologist for US-backed death squad regimes throughout
Latin America.
See Also:
US "democracy" in
Iraq: death squads, torture and terror
[6 July 2005]
Journalist killed after investigating
US-backed death squads in Iraq
[1 July 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |