|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
US-Russian strains dominate Bush-Putin meeting in Bratislava
By Justus Leicht
28 February 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
President Bushs European tour ended as it had begun.
Despite all the overt demonstrations of friendship between George
and Vladimir, the meeting between Bush and Russian
President Putin in the Slovakian capital Bratislava could not
mask the growing tensions between the two governments. Washington
is demanding the subordination of Russia to US foreign policy
interests and the complete opening up of the Russian economy to
international capital.
Prior to the meeting, Bush stepped up Washingtons efforts
to isolate and weaken Russia and pry loose from its orbit former
Soviet Republics and other regions historically within Moscows
sphere of influence. In a speech in Brataslavas main square,
Bush praised the recent, US-backed and financed democratic
revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine that replaced regimes
close to Russia with governments aligned with Washington. He then
called for similar democratic change in Moldova and
Belarus.
Putin had supported Bushs re-election and was one of
the first to congratulate him on his victory. His calculations
that a second Bush administration would collaborate with him in
the name of the war against terror and leave him a
free hand in Russia and the former Soviet republics has quickly
proven to be completely mistaken.
Just days after Bush was returned to office, the US supported
the so-called orange revolution in the Ukraine, which
installed a pro-American regime. Then, the new US secretary of
state, Condoleezza Rice, labelled Belarus and Iran, Putins
most important allies in the Confederation of Independent States
(CIS) and the Middle East respectively, as outposts of tyranny.
Prior to the Bratislava summit, Bush had sharply attacked the
Russian government. For Russia to make progress as a European
nation, the Russian government must renew its commitment to democracy
and the rule of law, Bush said. We recognize that
reform will not happen overnight. We must always remind Russia,
however, that our alliance stands for a free press, a vital opposition,
the sharing of power, and the rule of law. And the United States
and all European countries should place democratic reform at the
heart of their dialogue with Russia.
Putin rejected the criticism. Naturally, the fundamental
principles of democracy and the institutions of democracy must
be adapted to the reality of todays life in Russia, to our
traditions and history, he declared in a newspaper interview.
One week before the summit, Putin had demonstratively welcomed
Hassan Rohani, Irans chief negotiator in nuclear issues
and secretary of Irans National Security Council. Putin
said he was convinced that the Iranian nuclear program served
exclusively peaceful purposes. The US claims Iran is seeking to
construct nuclear weapons. After his meeting with Putin, Rohani
announced that the two countries would sign an accord to send
spent nuclear fuel from Iran to Russia.
American sources expressed concern that Russia wanted to sell
Syria S-400 surface-to-air missiles. This air defence system is
apparently able to destroy targets that use radar-avoiding stealth
technology. Russia insisted that the S-400 system was based on
purely conventional weapons and was defensive in nature, and that
there is presently no international arms embargo against Syria.
Syria and Iran are Russias two most important allies
in the Middle East. Moscow is now the biggest arms supplier to
Tehran, including aircraft, submarines and tanks. The two countries
also collaborate economically. Russia and Iran have agreed to
build two hydroelectric power plants in the Central Asian republic
of Tajikistan. The contract is valued at up to 380 million euros.
They are also collaborating in the design, development and launching
of the Iranian Zohreh satellite, signing a contract
in January to this end worth some $132 million. Russian firms
are also involved in the Iranian energy sector.
Iran has the second largest reserves of gas and the fourth
largest oil reserves in the world, and its location between the
Caspian Sea and Persian Gulf give it great strategic significance.
Moreover, it has a modern infrastructure and pipeline system and
is therefore an ideal transit route to bring oil and gas to the
world market. A pro-American regime change in Tehran would bring
world energy supplies even more firmly under US control.
Faced with American pressure, the Putin government is searching
for international allies. At the same time, it is trying to prevent
the US exercising too much control over the Russian economy.
At the end of last year, Putin struck an agreement with Japan
to build a giant oil pipeline from Siberia to the Pacific coast,
enabling Russian oil to be transported to Asia circumventing the
Middle East. A major Sino-Russian military manoeuvre on Chinese
territory is planned this year. Russia has also announced its
intention to more than double the amount of oil it supplies to
China, from 6.5 to 15 million tonnes, in 2006. China is now the
second largest net importer of oil in the world, and, like Japan,
is one of the largest purchasers of Iranian oil. Like Russia,
it is also one of the most important arms suppliers to Tehran.
Russia, on the other hand, is the second largest oil producer
in the world. Putins actions against the oligarch Mikhail
Khodorkovskywhose Yukos corporation collaborated closely
with American oil firms and who eventually financed opposition
newspapers and organizationsevoked sharp protests from Washington.
However, this did not prevent the Russian government from putting
Khodorkovsky behind bars and bringing his corporation under state
control through a compulsory auction.
According to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Russia
is planning to go even further. In future, foreign companies will
be allowed only a minority holding in firms applying for licences
to tap and extract strategic resources like oil and gas. This
is one of the major issues behind the dispute about democracy
and the rule of law in Russia.
For a moment, this became visible at the joint press conference
held by Bush and Putin in Bratislava. Like an elementary school
teacher, the US president lectured Putin about the principles
of democracy, praised the frank, candid and constructive
dialogue with my friend, Vladimir, and declared Putin to
be fully committed to building such a democracy. However,
clearly referring to the Yukos affair, Putin concluded by emphasizing
that democracy did not mean that everybody can do whatever
they want and rob the people.
Bush claimed that there was more upon which the two agreed
than disagreed. But the only concrete example he could give, aside
from general statements about closer cooperation on economics
and nuclear security, was an agreement about limiting the spread
of MANPADs (Man Portable Air Defence Systems). Such
weapons are often used against the US occupiers by resistance
fighters in Iraq and Afghanistan. The agreement had been prepared
by defence ministers long before.
Regarding Iran and North Korea, Bush declared himself in agreement
with Putin that the two countries should not possess nuclear
weapons. Russia, however, has always justified its supply
of nuclear technology to Iran, which is opposed by Washington,
with the claim that it only serves civilian purposes.
Bush did not even mention other points of dispute, like the
sale of Russian air defence missiles to Syria.
See Also:
Bush in Germany: smiles cannot mask US-European
conflicts
[26 February 2005]
Bush in Europe: tensions boil beneath
talk of transatlantic unity
[22 February 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |