|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
Spain: record abstention in referendum on European Union constitution
By Julie Hyland
23 February 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The European Unions (EUs) proposed new constitution
passed its first hurdle on February 20 in Spains referendum,
with an overwhelming majority of voters supporting the constitution.
But the result was something of pyrrhic victory for Spains
official parties and much of Europes ruling elites, as fewer
than half of those able to vote participated in the referendumthe
lowest electoral turnout since the end of the Franco dictatorship
in 1975. Of the 42 percent of eligible voters who took part, 77
percent voted for the new constitution, with 17 percent against,
and 6 percent returning spoilt ballots.
The referendum was the first in a series of European polls
to be held over the next 18 months on the constitutional treaty,
which is aimed at consolidating the EU as an economic and military
bloc against its major rivals, particularly the United States.
The treaty must be ratified by all 25 EU member states to become
law. Ten states are to hold referendums on the issue, with the
remainder leaving the matter to a parliamentary vote. The treaty
has already been ratified in this manner by Lithuania, Hungary
and Slovenia.
Prior to the referendum, the World Socialist Web Site published
a statement calling for rejection of the EU constitution and advancing
an independent working class alternative, based on the unification
of Europe on socialist foundations. [See Vote
no in Spanish referendum on European Union constitution
]
Since it joined the EU in 1986, Spain has been a major beneficiary
of European funds and subsidies. As such, it is considered the
country most supportive of the EU project, a major reason why
Europes ruling elites considered it the best place to start
a continent-wide campaign in favour of the new constitution.
Although billed as an exercise in popular, democratic consultation,
the campaign around the referendum was an entirely one-sided affair.
Both the ruling Socialist Party and the opposition right-wing
Popular Party are fully committed to the treaty, as are most of
the regional and nationalist parties.
Millions were spent on a glitzy campaign using footballers,
actors and other celebrities to proclaim the virtue of a yes
vote. The purpose of this campaign was to deaden critical faculties
and ensure the utmost confusion over the fundamental issues raised
by the constitutional treaty.
Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapateros unseemly
rush to hold a referendum, barely four months after it was officially
agreed by the EU member states, was itself an attempt to steamroll
public support behind the treaty by curtailing any serious discussion
or scrutiny of its 448 articles. Opinion polls found that by the
end of the referendum campaign, some nine out of ten Spaniards
still did not know what the EU constitution consisted of.
Even then, the Spanish bourgeoisie built in a fail-safe, should
they prove unable to swing public opinion. The referendum was
deemed a consultative affair and was not legally binding,
so if the ballot did not deliver the desired result, the treaty
could be pushed through a supportive parliament regardless.
This charade is made necessary by the character of the constitution
itself. The treaty does not provide for a progressive, democratic
unification of the continent. Rather, it is aimed at legitimising
the efforts of European finance capital and the major transnational
corporations to consolidate a single, free trade market
on the continent, in order to mount an economic challenge to the
US, China and Asia.
The price for this is being paid by working people across Europe.
As all restrictions on capital are eliminated, and each national
government is held accountable for cutting taxes and public spending,
welfare provisionincluding decent health care and pension
rightsis being ruthlessly dismantled.
The EUs expansion to the eastincorporating the
impoverished, mainly former Stalinist states of Eastern Europehas
greatly facilitated this process, by establishing ever-lower benchmarks
for wages and conditions, with the aim of forcing workers across
the continent to compete against one another.
This is accompanied by the turn towards militarism. The US
policy of using military force to establish global American hegemony
threatens the imperialist interests of Europes major powers
and is spurring their own efforts to build up an independent military
capability, and thus ensure their share in a new colonial-style
plunder of the world.
The EU treaty enshrines these economic and military objectives,
thereby creating a legal basis for enforcing the diktats of European
capital against the working class and reviving neo-colonialism
and militarism by Europes great powers.
By placing itself in the forefront of the campaign for the
new treaty, the Spanish government had hoped to carve a major
role for itself in this offensive. Ever since it was brought to
power last year on the backs of a mass movement against the Iraq
war, the Zapatero government has sought to exploit popular opposition
to US imperialism as a means of repositioning Spain at the centre
of a more assertive agenda on the part of the European bourgeoisie.
Following the referendum result, Zapatero claimed, Today
we Spaniards made European history because our vote is a message
directed to the rest of Europes citizens, who were waiting
eagerly for our response.
In reality, the vote indicated the gulf between the mass of
working people in Spain and the ruling elite. Despite almost complete
unanimity across the official political spectrum and in the media,
only two of out five people turned out to endorse the treaty.
Even whilst the heads of EU states lined up to congratulate Zapatero
on securing a yes vote, there was no disguising the
fact that the record levels of abstention had generated grave
concern. France and the Netherlands are due to hold referenda
in the spring, and the outcome is far less certain than in Spain,
whilst referendums next year in Britain and the Czech Republic
are even less assured.
The Spanish result has confirmed that the efforts by Europes
ruling elites to try to secure even the trappings of a popular
mandate for a treaty that is predicated on undermining the democratic
rights and social concerns of working people is an uphill struggle.
From the standpoint of the independent interests of the working
class, however, the more fundamental lesson from the referendum
is the absence of any progressive alternative within the framework
of bourgeois politics and the existing mass parties to the European
ruling elites big-business agenda.
Alienation and enmity towards the EU do not in themselves provide
the foundations for the necessary efforts by the working class
across Europe to assert their own class interests. The democratic
and harmonious unification of the continent is a vital necessity.
By overcoming Europes division into a myriad of competing
nation states, the way would be cleared for utilising the enormous
technical, cultural and material resources of the continent so
as to put an end to all forms of poverty and backwardness.
But this can only be achieved by the European working class
in an irreconcilable struggle against big business and its political
representatives, based on the perspective of the United Socialist
States of Europe. Only this programme provides the essential means
through which working people can oppose the drive to militarism
by both the US and their own rulers, while defending hard-won
social gains and democratic rights from the offensive of the transnational
corporations and big-business politicians.
See Also:
Bush in Europe: tensions boil beneath
talk of transatlantic unity
[22 February 2005]
Vote no in Spanish referendum
on European Union constitution
[19 February 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |