|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
Britain: rise in superbug cases linked to decrease
in hospital cleaning staff
By Brian Smith
22 January 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Britains largest union, UNISON, has drawn attention to
the dramatic decrease in the numbers of cleaning staff in the
countrys hospitals and the corresponding rise in the incidence
of the so-called superbug, MRSA.
In a report issued this month, UNISON notes that the size of
the cleaning staff working in National Health Service (NHS) facilities
has fallen from about 100,000 in 1984 to about 55,000 today. The
decrease in staff numbers is due to the contracting out of cleaning
jobs, which began under the previous Conservative government.
It has led to poor training, low retention levels due to pitiful
wages and dirty hospitals, which in turn have directly contributed
to the rise of MRSA.
The British government admits that the number of cleaners in
the NHS has played a part in the spread of MRSA, but Health Secretary
John Reid denied a direct correlation. He also quibbled about
the numbers, saying that in 1986 there were 86,000 cleaners, and
that the size of the NHS estate had decreased by 20 percent over
the period, so therefore, there is less physical space to clean.
MRSA is the acronym of the disease Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus (commonly called staph). Staph
are bacteria often carried on the skin or in the nose of healthy
people. They are a common cause of minor skin infectionssuch
as pimples and boilsbut can also cause serious infections
such as surgical wound infections, bone infections and pneumonia.
Approximately 25-30 percent of the population is colonised with
staph bacteria at any one timei.e., have the bacteria
on or in their bodies without it causing illness. At the point
where it begins to cause them illness, it is referred to as infection
rather than colonisation.
Methicillin is a form of the antibiotic penicillin that has
historically been used to treat staph. However, over the
past 50 years, staph has increasingly become resistant
to antibiotics, which has led to the use of the nickname superbug.
New strains of MRSA are constantly emerging, and there are deep
concerns that it is becoming increasingly resistant to the last-resort
antibiotic Vancomycin.
The first report of a penicillin resistant strain of staph
was in 1945. MRSA was first reported in Europe in the 1960s, and
in the US in 1968.
MRSA is usually contracted in hospital but can occur in the
wider community, where it is closely linked to recent antibiotic
use, sharing contaminated items, having active skin diseases or
living in crowded settings. Within hospitals, post-op patients
are most at risk, particularly the elderly and those with chronic
illnesses. The working class and poor are generally more at risk,
since they tend to live in more crowded surroundings and are more
likely to visit hospital with chronic illnesses.
It is estimated that one in ten patients acquire the infection
during their hospital stay, and with approximately 100,000 hospital-acquired
infections per annum, this costs the NHS an estimated £1
billion a year.
During the last decade, deaths from hospital-acquired MRSA
have increased more than 15-fold, and infection rates 24-fold,
according to the UKs Office of National Statistics. Fifty-one
deaths were reported from 210 infections in 1993, compared to
800 deaths from 5,309 infections in 2002. MRSA cases as a proportion
of all staph cases have risen from 2 percent in 1994 to
more than 40 percent in 2004.
The figures are extracted from death certificates, and Tony
Field from the national MRSA support group believes that the real
figure is much higher, since doctors are not obliged to put MRSA
on the death certificate as a secondary cause of death. The groups
analysis suggests that the true figure for staph deaths
is closer to 20,000, with around half of these from MRSA. Field
also believes that the governments widely used figure of
5,000 deaths is outdated and drawn from statistics compiled in
1994.
The Department of Health has said that it did not have a clear
idea what the death rate was, and added cynically that the people
who die from hospital-acquired infections are already very ill,
which is why their immune systems cannot fight the bacteria.
A number of health care professionals have raised the alarm
at the level of infections in Britains hospitals. One of
these is Dr. Chris Malyszewicz, who has pioneered research into
testing for levels of MRSA and other bacteria in hospitals, and
reports that he has been harassed by the government since speaking
out.
Malyszewicz claims that two senior government health advisors
visited him at home just hours after meeting with the Health Secretary.
During a tense and aggressive three-hour
meeting, they sought to discredit his work. It was clear
they were trying to shut me up, he said. Publicity
about my research into MRSA levels in NHS hospitals has obviously
caused problems.
The spread of MRSA
The reasons for the spread of MRSA are complex and involve
a number of different factors, such as the inappropriate use of
antibiotics in agriculture and the over-prescription of antibiotics
in society. Most experts also consider ineffective hygiene control
and the connected inability to provide clean hospitals as key
factors in the recent upsurge in the incidence of MRSA.
Britain is ranked second-worst of the European Union countries
for the rate of MRSA as a proportion of all diseases in its hospitals,
which runs at 44 percent. This compares to rates of 1 percent
in the Netherlands, 19 percent in Germany, and 33 percent in France.
A quarter of Britains dirtiest hospitals are in London,
according to government figures, including some of the most prestigious
specialist hospitals.
The Netherlands attributes its success at tackling the infection
to its policy of Search and Destroyi.e., the screening of
patients for MRSA and the isolation of those found to be infected.
It has also set aside a number of single rooms in hospitals for
the treatment of those with MRSA. In addition, the Netherlands
has a much higher proportion of healthcare workers per patient
than the UK.
The isolation of those with MRSA in private rooms is recommended
by many experts, though a study in the medical journal The
Lancet has cast doubt on the use of isolation as a means of
curbing the spread of MRSA, at least in regard to intensive care
patients. It points to the need to comply with other means of
curbing disease in conjunction with isolatione.g., hand
washing and the use of protective clothing.
Hand hygiene is by far the most important strategy in controlling
MRSA, though there are a number of contact precautions that experts
also suggest. These include the use of gowns, gloves and dedicated
equipment, as well as the transportation of patients only when
absolutely essential.
Bed making in hospitals is also thought to be a factor in the
spread of infection, as it releases large quantities of microorganisms.
Studies have shown that vigorous bed making can lead to in excess
of 6,000 colony-forming units per cubic metre of air in the ward.
The problem is that as one patient leaves a bed another
is just about to occupy it, which means you do not have time to
clean the beds, believes Michael Summer of the Patients
Association. In other countries they actually rotate the
beds so that the infection is carefully monitored.
MRSA takes up to 48 hours to grow and is often not picked up
until the patient has been in hospital for several days.
Dr. Clive Beggs of Leeds University explains how sneezing can
also cause infection to spread. When a patient sneezes, droplets
are expelled at around 100 metres per second. These are largely
made up of droplets between 10 and 100 micro metres in
diameter. The larger droplets fall to the ground, but the smaller
droplets can evaporate and shrink to droplet nuclei that settle
slowly. For example, droplet nuclei of 2 micro metres in
diameter can take more than four hours to fall 2 metres in a calm
room. Convection currents could therefore carry particles long
distances dependent on ventilation conditions, thereby distributing
them widely throughout the hospital.
Contract cleaners
The Thatcher governments privatisation strategy in the
1980sthe introduction of competitive tendering and the contracting-out
of servicesled directly to an escalation in MRSA rates.
Over the next decade, efficiency drives saw the almost
total destruction of the NHS culture, with nursing staff forced
onto short-term contracts and cut to inappropriate and dangerous
levels.
Prior to this, in the 1970s, cleaners were employed directly
by the hospital. Each ward had its own cleaners who were part
of the ward team. Porters, maintenance staff and cleaners had
pride in their wards, and many worked for most of their careers
in the same place.
The NHS Trust hospitals that emerged from the creeping privatisation
process are under enormous pressure to cut costs, and will invariably
pick the cheapest option in choosing their contracted-out services.
This almost necessarily leads to contractors cutting corners and
subsequently to a less efficient or thorough job being undertaken.
The cleaning companies operate on tightly drawn contracts, where
every task is listed and timed, which leaves no place for anything
not on the list, including accidents. An attitude of apathy and
disregard for cleanliness pervades.
The pressure on hospitals to cut costs has also led to other
factors that help spread infections. For example, in the past,
hospital workers were issued uniforms for use only on the premises,
and these were laundered on siteoften boil-washed. Nowadays,
staff are responsible for their own uniforms, which they wear
to and from work, via public transport, etc. Uniforms, therefore,
gather many germs from the environment en-route, and are then
probably often washed at home on normal domestic low-temperature
washes, which do not kill many germs.
A journalist from the Daily Mail who worked undercover
for Rentokil Initial, one of the firms with contracts to clean
hospitals, revealed that he received only a 90-minute induction
course and had no relevant experience. He reported finding bags
of blooded bandages and plaster casts left overnight in the fracture
clinic. He also found 2-inch (5-cm) insects, and heard of cleaners
failing to clean areas properly because of their workload. The
areas he was allocated were to be checked just once a month by
the hospital trust and once a week by his Rentokil Initial supervisor,
if she had time.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |