|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Washington prepares international network of permanent detention
camps
By Rick Kelly
5 January 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The Bush administration is crafting a series of measures to
secure the permanent detention without trial of alleged terrorists
and those it designates as enemy combatants, the Washington
Post reported Sunday. In gross violation of international
law, detainees may soon be held in new US-constructed prisons
in Guantanamo Bay, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen, without
access to lawyers or family members.
The Pentagon and the CIA have asked the White House to
decide on a more permanent approach for potentially lifetime detentions,
including for hundreds of people in military and CIA custody whom
the government does not have enough evidence to charge in courts,
the Post reported. The outcome of the review, which
involves the State Department as well, would also affect those
expected to be captured in the course of future counterterrorism
operations.
One measure under consideration is the transfer of Afghan,
Saudi and Yemeni detainees currently held in the Guantanamo Bay
detention camp to prisons built by the US in their home countries.
These prisons may also be used to detain those currently held
by the Central Intelligence Agency. Almost nothing is known about
how many prisoners are in the hands of the CIA, or the conditions
under which they are kept. The CIA reportedly maintains secret
detention facilities on ships at sea, and at military bases in
Afghanistan and on the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia.
The Post noted that these detainees represent the Bush
administrations toughest detention problem,
and that the CIA has been scurrying since Sept. 11, 2001,
to find secure locations abroad where it could detain and interrogate
captives without risk of discovery, and without having to give
them access to legal proceedings. A proposal of the intelligence
agency to operate its own secret prison was rejected as impractical.
Local authorities will run the new prisons, while the State
Department will reportedly monitor operations, ensuring compliance
with recognized human rights standards.
Such assurances are hardly credible. The Bush administration
has systematically flouted human rights conventions in the name
of the war on terror. The use of torture has been sanctioned at
the highest levels of the government, and, as leaked Red Cross
reports have demonstrated, US authorities routinely inflict torture
upon Guantanamo Bay prisoners.
Claims regarding the protection of human rights are particularly
cynical, given that the new measures are deliberately designed
to violate long-established legal rights and norms. Anyone the
government designates an enemy combatant now faces life imprisonment,
without trial, without access to legal advice, and without any
hope of appeal or review. Detainees are dropped into a legal black
hole, and face totally unchecked interrogation methods.
The international prison system will effectively entrench and
systematize the CIAs illegal practice known as rendering.
This is where the intelligence agency secretly transfers detainees
to various third countries, such as Egypt, Jordan and Syria. Rendering
has been used to employ local security forces use of extreme
torture and brutality, while evading US and international law.
The Bush administrations proposals again demonstrate
the brazen criminality of its war on terror. Despite
all of the extremely damaging revelations of US abuse of detainees
in Iraq and Guantanamo Bay that emerged last year, the government
is plunging ahead with a new system that will inevitably lead
to further abuse and torture.
The plan has already led to disquiet among those in the political
establishment who fear adverse long-term consequences for the
USs international position if the present course is maintained.
Its a bad idea, Senator Richard Lugar, chairman
of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, declared. So
we ought to get over it and we ought to have a very careful, constitutional
look at this.
The Post referred to an unnamed senior administration
official who noted that the new detention proposals were necessary
because the current detention system has strained relations
between the United States and other countries. But rather
than alter any of the features of the current system that has
provoked so much international oppositioncontravention of
international law, secret detention without trial, abuse, torture,
etc.the government has evidently concluded that the problem
lies in excessive public and judicial review of its operations.
The Bush administrations move to shift detainees from
Guantanamo Bay has been provoked, in part, by a Supreme Court
ruling earlier this year that allowed prisoners to challenge their
detention in federal court.
While this decision did not challenge the governments
right to imprison whomever it deems an enemy combatant, the Bush
administration views any measure of judicial oversight over its
operations as an unwarranted irritant. It is highly unlikely that
the US judiciary could claim any jurisdiction over those detainees
transferred to the nominal control of authorities in their home
countries.
It is unclear whether the Red Cross would have access to detainees
held in the new prisons. Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and Afghanistan
all have atrocious human rights records. In Yemen, the Red Cross
suspended prison visits last year after the government refused
access to prisoners held by its Political Security department.
Detainees who remain in Guantanamo Bay will soon be held in
a $25 million, 200-bed prison, dubbed Camp 6, replacing
the existing makeshift detention facilities on the American base.
The prison complements the already constructed 100-cell Camp
5. The Pentagon is also preparing to replace the mostly
reservist force currently guarding the facilities with a 324-member
military police battalion.
Unnamed defense officials told the Washington Post that
the new facility will be used for those who are unlikely
to ever go through a military tribunal for lack of evidence.
This admission again demonstrates the wholly fraudulent nature
of the Bush administrations attempt to create the appearance
of judicial review for detainees through the use of these tribunals.
See Also:
Documents reveal systematic
torture by US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan
[24 December 2004]
International Red
Cross charges systematic abuse
Bush's "Torture Inc." at Guantanamo
[2 December 2004]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |