|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
Australian policeman murdered in the Solomon Islands
By Will Marshall
20 January 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The murder of Australian Protective Service officer Adam Dunning
in the Solomon Islands has highlighted simmering discontent towards
the Australian-led intervention in the tiny Pacific island state.
Dunning was killed in the early hours of December 22, while on
patrol in the capital Honiari. He was hit in the back by two of
six rounds fired from a high-calibre rifle at the Toyota Land
Cruiser in which he was travelling.
The murder was clearly against the Australian-led Regional
Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands (RAMSI), which has effectively
taken over key functions in the country, including the police,
prisons, courts and finance. The killing punctures the myth, carefully
cultivated by the Australian government and media, that there
is no opposition to what is effectively a neo-colonial occupation
of the country.
The attack on Dunning is not an isolated event. RAMSI claims
that the alleged murderer, James Tatau, who has just been captured,
is connected to a previous shooting incident. In October, three
shots were fired at another RAMSI vehicle resulting in a Nauruan
police officer receiving minor shrapnel wounds. His Tongan colleague
escaped uninjured.
In response to the Dunning murder, Australian Prime Minister
John Howard declared that his government was undeterred,
unrestrained, unaffected by whats happening. Foreign
Minister Alexander Downer, who just days before had been in Honiara
praising RAMSI officials, declared: We wont be cowed
by this. Canberra immediately dispatched a rapid response
squad of 100 troops to bolster the security forces already in
the country.
Australian Federal Police Commissioner Mick Keelty blamed isolated
criminal elements for the killing, saying: By far the majority
of people in the Solomon Islands have welcomed RAMSI. Theyve
celebrated the results that RAMSI has achieved for the people
of the Solomon Islands. But the decision to send more heavily
armed troops to the Solomons as a show of force indicates concerns
in Canberra about broader unrest.
The media, which until now has been completely uncritical of
the Australian intervention, has begun to hint at wider hostility
in the Solomons. The Australian newspaper cited the comments
of Hugh White, director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute,
which drew up the plan for the Australian intervention. White
declared that RAMSI had succeeded in establishing law and
order in Honiara, then added: They [have] collected
a lot of guns and made a lot of progress but the deeper tensions
hadnt been resolved.
A significant section of the Solomon Islands population probably
did believe, initially at least, Canberras claims to be
bringing peace and prosperity. The country had been engulfed in
political turmoil since the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis precipitated
an economic breakdown. Social services and the police force virtually
collapsed amid fighting between rival armed gangs. Australia and
New Zealand compounded the underlying economic and social problems
by insisting on far-reaching economic restructuring and by withholding
financial aid.
The RAMSI intervention was not aimed at helping Solomon Islanders,
but at consolidating Canberras grip on its traditional sphere
of influence in the South West Pacific. In the wake of the Iraq
invasion, Howard drew on the support of Washington to mount his
own pre-emptive action. Branding the Solomons as a
failed state that could become a breeding ground for
international terrorists and criminals, he bullied Honiara into
rubberstamping an Australian takeover and other Pacific Islands
nations into backing his plan.
Over the last 18 months, however, social conditions for the
majority of the population have not improved and the role of RAMSI
soldiers and police as an occupying force has become increasingly
evident. As a result, local support for the Australian presence
has fallen.
In July 2003, immediately after Australian troops had landed,
a survey by the Solomon Islands Development Trust found that RAMSIs
approval rating was 94 percent. Just six months later, a similar
survey found growing concerns about living standards. In the category
A Better Life, only 64 percent of respondents gave
RAMSI a favourable rating.
Lack of democratic rights
RAMSI has stamped its authority over the Solomon Islands by
building police stations and expanding the prison system. There
have been over 3,700 weapons collected and 4,000 people detained
and facing charges. In doing so, Australian officials and police
have trampled on basic democratic rights. Prisoners have been
held in solitary for lengthy periods of time and interrogated
without lawyers present.
Last August, a prison riot broke out over the lack of rights
and poor food in Rove jail. Detainees were heard shouting slogans
calling for RAMSIs withdrawal from the country. Inmates
alleged that RAMSI officials had used threats and offers of immunity
or bail to coerce prisoners into making written statements implicating
themselves and others in crimes ranging from murder to extortion.
Broader grievances have been voiced over the lack of justice.
While villagers have been arrested and detained for relatively
minor crimes, local politicians who have collaborated with RAMSI
have got off scot-free. Prime Minister Allan Kemakeza, for instance,
who agreed to the Australian intervention, is widely accused of
involvement in payoffs to one of the militia groupsthe Malaitan
Eagle Force (MEF).
Senior Superintendent Romanu Tikotikoca, who commanded the
Fijian contingent of security forces until last April, returned
to the Solomons after the Dunning murder. He told the Fiji
Times this month: Theres a degree of dissatisfaction
within the community and I picked that up during my first trip
there. Those from Malaita and Guadalcanal are not happy with the
arrest of some people by RAMSI.
Complete legal immunity for RAMSI personnel, agreed to by the
Solomon Islands government at Canberras insistence, has
also become a source of discontent. Several RAMSI members have
been accused of sexual misconduct towards local women and children,
but have not been charged in the Solomon Islands. A case involving
an Australian was being heard in Melbourne at the time of Dunnings
murder, but a court suppression order barred the release of any
details.
The most outspoken opposition to RAMSI has come from the Maasina
Forum. General Secretary William Gua said last October that the
Forum strongly felt that the Enabling Bill allowing the Australian
intervention to go ahead had violated the countrys sovereignty.
A Forum statement condemned the Kemakeza government as a
puppet of Australia that was being dictated [to] by
the Howard Government of Australia.
The growing tensions are also being fuelled by the huge disparity
between the lifestyle of RAMSI personnel and the poverty of most
Solomon Islanders. In an interview last year with the WSWS, a
former prison officer commented: The ex-pats who are on
$13,000 a month are living in the King Solomon Hotel with TVs,
showers and maids to make their beds, etc. They are living extremely
comfortably. Then the locals are living in shanties, with cooking
and bathing facilities outside. It is just disgusting. In Honiara,
just near the main bridge, you can see people living in sheds,
14 foot square, five to a room.
Far from improving living standards for Solomon Islanders,
RAMSI has focussed on implementing further economic restructuring.
In January last year, former RAMSI chief Nick Warner insisted
on the reversal of a small wage rise of $8 a fortnight for lowly-paid
public sector workers on about $30 a week. Meanwhile, Australian
advisers and consultants are being paid salaries 100 times highersome
$14,000 a month.
Tensions are clearly mounting. In an extraordinary article
on January 6, columnist John Roughan warned the Howard government
against further alienating Solomons Islanders. Roughan, who is
the founder of the Solomon Islands Development Trust and an open
supporter of the Australian intervention, wrote:
[T]here has been a sea change in how people now view
RAMSI and what they witnessed and experienced on RAMSIs
original arrival, 24 July 2003... Of course Solomon Islanders
want the murderers [of Dunning] captured, tried and, if found
guilty, given life sentences. But the question is how best to
capture those responsible. The present strong-arm approach on
its own is doomed to failure...
[G]aining peoples confidence is rarely accomplished
using the business end of an M-14. The country has seen more than
enough national suffering born of the gun, of lawlessness, of
all the things that scarred it during our Social Unrest years
of 1998-2003. They dont want a return to that kind of life,
ever.... The present dangerous situation must be nipped in the
bud now. Such a situation helps no one, neither RAMSI nor Solomon
Islanders. Its fast becoming a no-win situation.
As the decision to dispatch more Australian troops indicates,
the Howard government has too much at stake to pull back now.
The Solomon Islands operation was just the first step in Canberras
broader ambitions to intervene more directly throughout the region.
Any softening of its stance in Honiara would undermine demands
for other Pacific Island countries, including Nauru, Papua New
Guinea and Vanuatu, to accept the imposition of Australian officials.
In the Solomon Islands, the result will be deepening opposition
to RAMSI that will take many different forms. Dunning is the first
casualty of what is likely to become escalating resistance to
the Australian occupation of the country.
See Also:
Solomon Islands: prison
protest over lack of rights under Australian intervention
[18 August 2004]
An exchange on the
Australian intervention in the Solomon Islands
[31 March 2004]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |