|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : World
Economy
A warning to the G-8 from the bankers bank
By Nick Beams
5 July 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
On the eve of the G-8 meeting this week, the major capitalist
powers have been given a warning that despite the appearance of
healthy growth, the problems of the global economy are increasing.
The warning comes in the 75th annual report of the Bank for International
Settlements (BIS) issued last week. According to the BIS, known
as the central bankers bank, growing international debt
and imbalances in the world economy have created the conditions
for economic and financial crises.
Describing the growth of almost 5 percent in the world economy
in 2004, the best in nearly three decades, as so far, so
good, the BIS welcomed the less volatile inflation and output
growth of the recent period. Less welcome, it continued,
are growing external and internal imbalances, the latter
leading to more frequent periods of financial stress often associated
with rapid increases in credit, asset prices and investment.
The report pointed to a massive expansion of global liquidity,
resulting from the efforts by many countries to ease their monetary
policies and to accumulate currency reserves, in order to resist
appreciation of their currencies against the US dollar.
While it would be difficult to get agreement on the proposition
that the global economy has problems, the report contented,
there was more of a consensus that it has certain exposures.
One simply cannot ignore the number of indicators that are
now simultaneously exhibiting marked deviations from historical
norms.
Among the internal imbalances that compel attention
are:
* The decline in real policy interest rates (the base set by
the central bank) in many industrial countries and in emerging
Asia to close to zero.
* The remarkably low nominal rate on long-term bonds, as well
as the narrowing of credit spreadsthe difference in interest
rates on low and high-risk assets.
* The downward trend in household savings in many industrial
countries and the increase in debt levels to record highs.
* The increase in house prices in many countries.
At the same time, external imbalances, resulting from the balance
of payments deficit of the US, have never been larger in
the postwar period.
Choosing its words carefullyit is not the job of a central
bank to create disturbancesthe BIS said that any one of
the financial phenomena it cited might well revert to the
mean. Such an unwinding might be gradual, and possibly
benign, but it could also be rapid and destructive. In large part,
what happens will be determined by real-financial interactions
that we should not pretend to fully understand.
The report said the widening US balance of payments deficit
was a serious longer-term problem. That is,
it could eventually lead to a disorderly decline of the dollar,
associated turmoil in other financial markets, and even recession.
More immediately, it could bring a resurgence of protectionist
pressure.
According to the BIS, the unprecedented size of the deficit
(now at more than 6 percent of US GDP), the speed with which external
debts are growing, the dependence of the US on other central banks
for external financing, and the fact that much US borrowing has
been used to finance consumption rather than investment, suggest
an eventual problem.
Moreover, given the interdependency of modern financial
markets, it is likely that problems would not be confined to the
dollar alone. A higher risk premium on US dollar-denominated assets
could raise long rates and spreads, with implications for asset
prices of all kinds.
In other words, a rapid decline in the value of the US dollar
would lead to a sharp rise in interest rates, which could then
spread around the world, deflating the housing bubbles that have
emerged in a number of countries. An increase in US rates could
also impinge severely on the so-called carry trades,
where financial institutions have borrowed at low rates in the
US to invest in longer-term and riskier assets at higher rates.
While pointing to the dangers of the US balance of payments
deficit, the BIS did not hold out the prospect that it could start
to come down in the near future through an increase in exports.
Rejuvenating the manufacturing sector will not be easy,
given that it has shrunk to only 10 percent of GDP, and that profits
in manufacturing remain lacklustre. The fact that the traded goods
sector has, so far, hardly shared in the recent upturn of investment
in the United States is also a discouraging sign. With competition
from China, India and other low-cost economies intensifying, it
was not a propitious moment to be seeking to regain international
market share.
The BIS warned that not enough attention was being paid to
the systemic issues thrown up by the financial imbalances nor
was there adequate recognition that acting in self-interest
may be far from optimal. What is needed now is real
dialogue among all those affected by these external imbalances.
Everyone needs to commit to some unpleasant compromises now, in
order to avoid even more unpleasant alternatives in the future.
In a lengthy chapter on financial markets, the BIS report pointed
to potential problems arising from the credit derivatives market.
While the market had come through the downgrading of General Motors
and Ford debt relatively well, this may not be a true indication
of how these markets would function under stress. This is
because the downgrading of the carmakers debt had been flagged
well in advance. A surprise event could cause much more damage.
The sums involved are truly staggering; and growing. The credit
default swap (CDS) market, which enables investors to hedge the
risk of default by individual borrowers, is increasing exponentially.
The BIS calculated that the amount outstanding on CDA contracts
reached $4.5 trillion at the end of June 2004, up six-fold from
the level three years earlier.
If there was a central policy theme to the report, it was that
economic and financial problems could be expected to worsen in
the coming period, with internal and external imbalances, rooted
in major structural changes in the global economy, having the
potential to unwind with disruptive impact. The danger
in such a situation was that what might seem evident policy
solutions for each country considered alone often stand in mutual
contradiction. In other words, problems arising from the
global nature of the capitalist economy come into conflict with
the system of nation-states.
Accordingly, the BIS wants to see cooperative solutions and
the establishment an international macrofinancial stabilisation
framework. But it acknowledged that given the reality of
vested sovereign interests such an international framework
would be hard to implement.
See Also:
Global interest rate "conundrum"
recalls the 1930s
[14 June 2005]
World economy becoming more
dependent on US debt
[30 May 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |