|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Autopsy proves Terri Schiavo was in vegetative state
By Kate Randall
16 June 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Findings of the autopsy performed on Terri Schiavo and released
to the press on Wednesday confirm the diagnosis of all the independent
doctors involved in her caseand upheld by numerous court
decisionsthat the woman had suffered massive and irreversible
brain damage, and was in a persistent vegetative state.
The autopsy report provides confirmation that there was no
legitimate basiseither scientifically or legallyfor
the frenzied campaign mounted by right-wing religious forces,
and adopted by the Bush administration and congressional Republicans,
against court rulings granting the request of Michael Schiavo,
Terris husband and legal guardian, to remove her feeding
tube.
The World Socialist Web Site published extensive analysis
and commentary on the Schiavo case and its far-reaching political
and cultural implications. (See: The
case of Terri Schiavo and the crisis of politics and culture in
the United States).
Terri Schiavo collapsed on February 25, 1990 when her heart
suddenly stopped beating. By the time an emergency crew had revived
her, her brain had been without blood for several minutes and
was severely damaged. After years of seeking remedies for his
wifes condition, Michael Schiavo petitioned the courts to
allow his wife to die.
He argued that she would not have wanted to continue her life
in such a vegetative state, and had expressed her wishes to that
effect. Some 40 judges in six court decisions upheld Mr. Schiavos
request to have his wifes feeding tube removed, and the
US Supreme Court consistently refused to intervene in the case.
But the religious right mounted a vicious campaign against Michael
Schiavo, vilifying him as a murderer.
The autopsy conducted by Penellas-Pasco (Florida) Medical Examiner
Jon Thogmartin decisively refutes the claims of Terri Schiavos
parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, and their allies in the Christian
right that Terri merely had diminished brain function, and that
her condition might have improved with further treatment.
The autopsy involved 274 external and internal tests on Terri
Schiavos body. Thogmartin said that Ms. Schiavos brain
weighed about 615 grams, far less than normal, when the 41-year-old
woman died on March 31 of this year, 13 days after her feeding
tube had been removed. This damage was irreversible,
he said, and no amount of therapy or treatment would have
regenerated the massive loss of neurons.
Thogmartin commented, Mrs. Schiavos brain showed
marked global anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (brain damage from
lack of oxygen and blood flow) resulting in massive cerebral atrophy.
Her brain weight was approximately half of the expected weight.
Thogmartin also said that the entire region of the brain that
processes visual images was gone, meaning that she had been blind.
This is important, because Terris parents had maintained
that their daughter had been capable of using her eyes to see
and communicate with relatives when they visited her in the hospice,
and that this was evidence of her cognitive function.
Doctors involved in the autopsy said its findings were consistent
with the diagnosis of numerous doctors involved in Terris
case over the last decade and a halfthat she had no cognitive
functions, only the ability to breathe and keep her heart beating,
and that her actions were reflexive responses.
Michael Schiavos attorney, George Felos, commented to
the press, Mr. Schiavo was pleased to hear the evidence
and hard science of those findings. We have been saying for years
and years and years that the expert testimony has shown that Terris
eye movement and apparent response to visual stimuli was a reflexive
action.
The autopsy showed no signs that Ms. Schiavo had been abused
before she lapsed into her unconscious state, a charge lodged
by her parents and various right-wing spokespersons against Michael
Schiavo. Thogmartin said there were no signs of trauma or neck
injury, and no other evidence of either neglect or abuse.
The report also showed that Terri Schiavos death after
the removal of the feeding tube was caused by dehydration, not
starvation, and that she would not have experienced pain as she
died. The autopsy also established that after her feeding tube
had been removed, it would have been impossible for her to eat
or drink on her own. Terrys parents and their supporters
among the Christian right had demanded that she be offered water
in the final days and hours of her life.
Michael Schiavo plans to release some of the autopsy photos
to the press, according to his attorney.
Those who had campaigned for the reinsertion of Terri Schiavos
feeding tube responded to the autopsy results by turning a blind
eye to the irrefutable scientific evidence and reiterated their
claims that the issues in her case were the right to life
and the rights of disabled people.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan commented, Our
thoughts and prayers remain with her family and friends. The president
was deeply saddened by this case.
Florida Governor Jeb Bush said, We will continue to strive
to protect our most vulnerable citizens. All innocent human life
is precious and government has a duty to protect the weak, disabled
and vulnerable.
Rev. Frank Pavone, national director of the anti-abortion group
Priests for Life, declared, Terri did not die from an atrophied
brain. She died from an atrophy of compassion on the part of her
estranged husband and those who helped him to have her deliberately
killed.
In reality, the religious right and its allies in the Republican
Party and the Bush administration cynically exploited the Terri
Schiavo case to advance their own reactionary agenda.
On March 20, the US House and Senate met in emergency session
to pass an extraordinary bill enabling the Schindlers to file
suit in federal court to block the withdrawal of life support
from their daughter. In an unusual display by a president not
known to cut short his vacation time, Bush flew back from Texas
to sign the bill.
The Democratic leadership in Congress, which could have easily
blocked the bill, did not oppose it, and some prominent Democrats
openly supported it.
The intervention by Congress and the White House was profoundly
reactionary and anti-democratic from a number of standpoints:
it was an assault on the independence of the judiciary and the
constitutionally mandated separation of powers; it was an attempt
to promotein violation of the separation of church and statethe
most reactionary and anti-scientific religious conceptions; it
was an attack on privacy rights and an illegitimate insertion
of government into the most personal of matters.
See Also:
The Schiavo case: Bush and
Congress trample on science and the Constitution
[23 March 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |