|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
US: the panicked evacuation of Capitol Hill
By Bill Van Auken
13 May 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Panic seized the US capital Wednesday and was transmitted in
amplified form to the entire country via the broadcast airwaves.
The cause was a light plane flown by two hapless pilots from rural
Pennsylvania, who mistakenly strayed into the restricted airspace
surrounding Washington DC.
In response, alarms sounded and gun-toting security agents
cleared the Capitol Building, shouting orders to Congressmen and
Senators to run, not walk, from the seat of the US legislature.
Other security units herded justices from the Supreme Court.
Vice President Dick Cheney, meanwhile, was transferred by motorcade
to an undisclosed secure location. For his part, President
George W. Bush was not told about the incident until it was over.
The Secret Service saw no need to interrupt his daily exercise
routine, allowing him to finish a ride on his mountain bike in
a Maryland park.
In the midst of the tumultuous evacuation of more than 35,000
people onto the streets of Washington, across the river in Virginia,
the Pentagons operations remained unperturbed, with Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld prepared to give the order to shoot
down the errant plane. In the end, Air Force F-16 fighter jets
escorted the plane to a nearby airfield.
The 45-minute episode marked the first time since the establishment
of the Homeland Security Departments color-coded terror
alert system that the alert has raised to red, the highest level.
The mass media responded to the incident by invoking the memory
of September 11. Having never seriously probed how and why 9/11
was allowed to take place, the media questioned whether or not
the episode proved that Americans were safer now than
before the attacks on New York and Washington
In a number of cases, television announcers asked with some
indignation why the Air Force didnt just shoot the plane
down or suggested that the two pilots should be severely punished
for prompting the mass evacuation.
As always, the essential questions posed by the incident were
not even suggested by the media, much less explored. Was this
merely a reflex security measure, or were political calculations
involved? And, what did the evacuation reveal about the state
of American democracy?
This was hardly the first such incident; incursions of the
restricted airspace near the White House and the Capitol Building
are commonplace. In 1994, a suicidal pilot flew another Cessna
aircraft into the White House, doing virtually no damage. At least
90 violations were recorded in the decade leading up to 9/11.
Since the September 11 attacks and the expansion of the restricted
area, the number of violations has only increased. In June 2002,
there was an incident virtually identical to the one that occurred
Wednesday. A single-engine Cessna 182 came within four miles of
the White House, and its pilot failed to respond when air traffic
controllers tried to contact him on emergency frequencies.
In that instance, while reporters and some others were asked
to leave the White House, the president stayed inside and there
was no evacuation of other buildings, much less a media uproar.
According to an Associated Press story published at the time,
Dozens of similar White House airspace violations have occurred
in recent weeks, officials said, without any noticeable consequences
on the ground.
In June of last year, there was one instance in which a similar
evacuation of the US Capitol and the Supreme Court was executed.
It came on the eve of Ronald Reagans funeral, when a two-engine
turbo-prop plane carrying Kentucky Governor Ernie Fletcher to
Washington for the ceremony failed to respond to ground controllers.
Fighter jets and Blackhawk helicopters scrambled before the plane
was identified and escorted to the Washington airport.
Curiously, though the incident involved what could have turned
into the fatal shootdown of a sitting governor, the medias
response was far more low key than in Wednesdays episode.
Nor was there any announcement from the Homeland Security Department
that the terror alert level had been raised to red.
What accounts for the atmosphere of hysteria this time around?
The Bush administration has persistently sought to terrorize the
American public into accepting its policies by invoking a supposedly
omnipresent terrorist danger. Under conditions in which the administration
confronts a rising tide of opposition to its militarist aggression
abroad and attacks on social conditions at home, it is entirely
probable that orders have been given to treat even the smallest
incident as if it were a major terrorist attack.
The manner in which Wednesdays incident was dealt with
has ominous implications for basic democratic rights and procedures
in the United States.
Consider the Washington Posts account of the
evacuation of the US Congress. Meetings were broken up by
barking...police officers who burst into Capitol rooms,
the newspaper reports.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was literally
lifted out of her pinkish high heels by Capitol Police in a hallway
outside the House chamber and bundled into a car to be driven
away, the Post adds.
With police wielding automatic weapons shouting at them to
run, the paper reports, Sen. Edward Kennedy
(D-Mass.) shuffled in the afternoon heat, leaning against a pole
and pausing to catch his breath.
Article 1 of the US Constitution declares, All legislative
powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United
States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
The founding document clearly presents the legislative body as
the first branch of the American government, meant
to most closely reflect the will of the people.
Yet, the portrait of this body Wednesday was one of impotence
and cowardice, its members running in terror over the possibility
that a small aircraft might be headed their way.
None of them, neither Democrat nor Republican, had either the
inclination or the courage to demand to know why what is on paper
the most powerful body in the land was being sent packing.
I was on the floor of the House like everyone else,
House Speaker Dennis Hastert told CNN News. [Security officers]
said we have to leave, just like everyone else. So we left,
he added lamely.
Pelosi, who confirmed to CNN that she was pulled right
out of her shoes, declared its better to be
safe than sorry.
It does not seem to occur to the Democratic congressional leader
that there are some things more important than personal safety.
At least for her and her colleagues, the independence and political
integrity of Congress are certainly not among them.
The ever-increasing erosion of congressional power and the
consolidation of authority in the hands of the presidency has
been going on for decades. Over the past four-and-a-half years,
however, this process has accelerated immensely, as the Democrats
have accepted the installation of an unelected president, backed
a criminal war and collaborated in a sweeping assault on fundamental
democratic rights.
The Democratic leadership is hardly in a position to stand
on the constitutional separation of powers and the authority of
the Congress. Nor are they inclined to do so. They are small people,
concerned not with political principles, but rather their own
careers and the big business interests that will make or break
them.
Wednesdays events were instructive. A small group of
armed men entered the Capitol, barked orders for Congress to disperse,
and it meekly did so. Meanwhile, the Pentagon took control, and
Vice President Cheney was whisked away to the undisclosed locationalmost
certainly the bunkers where a shadow government has been assembled,
prepared to rule as a dictatorship during a national emergency.
What if next time the armed men are ordered to keep the entrances
to Congress barred, if the White House decides to shut down the
legislative branch altogether and rule with unrestrained power?
Is there any reason to believe that the Chicken Littles in suits
who went scurrying down the Capitol stairs Wednesday will resist?
See Also:
US Marshals, local police stage
nationwide mass arrests
[16 April 2005]
Another step toward
a police state US Congress passes bill to restructure intelligence
agencies
[8 December 2004]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |