|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
How can they call themselves champions of democracy?
Sister of Guantanamo detainee Omar Deghayes speaks out
By Barbara Slaughter
16 May 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Thirty-five-year-old Omar Deghayes has been imprisoned in the
US detention camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba for three years. On
January 31, 2002, he was arrested in Pakistan along with his wife
and young baby by armed local intelligence officers.
Omars wife and child were later released, and he was
taken to Bagram airbase in Afghanistan. In September 2002, he
was transferred to Guantanamo. According to Clive Stafford Smith,
the well-known human rights lawyer who is Omars solicitor,
the British government has refused to act on his behalf on the
grounds that he is not a British citizen. They insist that he
has to apply to Libya for consular intervention, despite
the fact that his father, Amer Deghayes, a prominent Libyan trade
unionist and lawyer, was allegedly murdered by the Gaddafi regime
in 1980 and Omar has had refugee status in Britain since 1987.
In a recent Law Society press conference, Stafford Smith said
that in September 2004, the US allowed four Libyan intelligence
officers to interrogate Omar in Guantanamo. They accused him of
being a member of the Libyan opposition and threatened to kill
him.
His family, who originate from Libya but are now British nationals,
are campaigning for his release.
His sister, Amani, recently addressed a meeting in Huddersfield
to win support for the campaign for her brothers release.
While she was there, she spoke to Barbara Slaughter of the World
Socialist Web Site.
Barbara Slaughter: How long has Omar been in Guantanamo
Bay?
Amani Deghayes: About three years, since my wedding.
He has never met my husband or daughter. He was kidnapped in Pakistan.
Omar had studied law at Wolverhampton University and was doing
his legal practice here in Huddersfield University. When he didnt
pass all his exams, he decided to travel for a while. He intended
to come back in order to obtain his final qualifications. His
intention was to go to Malaysia, India, Pakistan and Afghanistan,
regions that we have never been to as a family. We have travelled
in Europe and North America, and because we are from North Africa,
we have seen most of the Arabic countries. At the time, there
was a lot of controversy about Afghanistan, and I think, being
a curious person, he wanted to go and see for himself what it
was like and whether what was being said was true. He met a lady
in Afghanistan and married her.
While Omar was in Afghanistan the war started, so he left the
country for Pakistan with his family because it seemed to be safer.
His child was only a few months old at the time.
While they were in Pakistan, they were all captured and imprisoned,
including his wife and child, which is outrageous. Then his wife
and child were released, and he was taken first to Bagram airbase
in Afghanistan and then to Guantanamo.
BS: Do you know what he was charged
with?
AD: We didnt know anything, but thanks to the
BBC we found out some of the evidence that is supposed to be against
him. The main evidence is a so-called Chechnyan terrorist
training video. In it, there is a caption saying that this
is Omar Deghayeswhich is my brothers nameexcept
that the person in it does not look anything like him.
When you are not confronted with the evidence, you cant
challenge anything. It makes it all very difficult to understand
what is going on. The only assumption we are making is that someone
might have claimed the person on the video as Omar Deghayesmaybe
someone who was being interrogated. The video was captured in
Spain, and the Spanish government have asked for Omar to be extradited
to Spain. This adds another element to his case.
Omar appeared on Americas most wanted web
site accompanied by that picture from the video.
We took photographs and the video to a recognition expert,
Professor Tim Valentine, of Goldsmiths College, London University.
He is an expert on face recognition and has given expert evidence
on identification issues in British court cases. His report on
Omar is five pages long; it goes into great detail. He concluded
it is not the same person. He did it in a very technical way.
You know it shocks me that they can hold someone for such a
long time with no concrete evidence and it seems they are not
willing to investigate it properly. This is not just about my
brother; its all the prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. Nobody
knows why they are being held.
We found out about the video completely by chance. I was doing
an interview about my brother on BBC Newsnight, and while
they were talking, someone just mentioned the video. I told them
we had never seen it and asked if we could have a copy. This is
the video that has caused a lot of disaster in my brothers
life and all our lives.
BS: What sort of condition is your
brother in?
AD: We have never been able to contact him directly
to speak about anything substantial, so all the information we
have comes from his lawyer, Clive Stafford Smith.
My brother has undergone some really bad torture in the various
places. I cant talk about the stuff that happened in Bagram
yet, because it is not declassified. But some of the stuff from
Guantanamo has been declassified, like the fact that he was beaten
and had faeces smeared on his face.
He has also been blinded in one eye. One of my brothers
eyes was slightly fragile anyway because he has had operations
on it since he was five years old, following a childhood accident.
One of the reasons I was born in Switzerland was because at that
time it was the most advanced place for treating such eye injuries.
My brother had to stay in Switzerland for a considerable time
to get treatment. He had to go back there every year for follow-up
treatment. It is very sad that after all those years he ends up
with that same eye completely blinded. Clive Stafford Smith tells
me that it is milky and white.
They sprayed pepper in his eyes, and one of the soldiers poked
him in the eye as well. He couldnt see anything for about
a week because of the pain. It continues to cause him pain because
it is light-sensitive, and they wont allow him to wear an
eye patch to protect it.
It is just horrific stuff, even if it wasnt my brother.
I think it is disgusting for anyone to be treated like thateven
a convicted criminallet alone someone who has not even been
charged with an offence. I dont understand how they can
call themselves the champions of democracy. They invaded
Iraq to teach the Iraqis about democracy, and this is how they
behave.
BS: What do you think about the American
and British governments?
AD: I think they are terrible. It is really shameful
for the Labour Party, which has always stood for left-wing values,
which are all about protecting civil liberties and being fair.
Then they go and attack a country that has not attacked them,
and while they are there, they do the most outrageous things.
All the stuff that is coming out from Iraq is shocking.
BS: Evidence that has been gained under torture is now
accepted in British law courts.
AD: Someone who is being tortured will say anything
to make it stop. The interrogator thinks he knows what the answer
is and wont stop the torture until they agree. It makes
me wonder about what is happening to the world, because this is
why we left our country, Libya.
BS: Why did your family leave Libya?
AD: My father, Amer, was executed in Libya because of
his political beliefs. I was 5 at the time and he was 40. He was
asked by the Gaddafi government to spy on people he knew who had
been politically active in the past. He refused to cooperate,
knowing that in a dictatorship like the one that we still have
he would be marked for death. He was prepared for that, and he
was given a period of time to think about it. He still refused
and that was it. On February 26, 1980, they came and picked him
up. After three days, we were told he had committed suicide in
prison. There is an Amnesty International report about how he
was killed.
That was in 1980. We had a lot of terrible times after my father
died. People were scared to associate with us. My four brothers
were treated differently at school. Omar himself nearly got into
a lot of trouble. He had exams, and they asked him to write an
essay on the revolution. He must have been 10 years old. He started
writing a lot of anti-revolution stuff about how they killed my
father and how terrible and unfair they are. It was a really dangerous
thing to do for all of us.
Luckily, Omar had a teacher who was our neighbour and she explained
to the headmaster about my father and persuaded him not to put
the essay through, so nothing happened. But there were other incidents.
Another brother had military training in his school and a bullet
went missing. Of course, they picked him because of my fathers
name, and he was put in a cell. There were lots of things like
that.
We werent allowed to leave the country until 1986, when
the whole family came here to Britain. Before that, only Omar
was allowed to travel to Switzerland for his eye treatment.
I thought that the terrible experiences we had in Libya were
all behind us. We have made a home for ourselves in the UK, and
we are very grateful for that. We have had a safe life up till
now. We have always had strong links with the UK, which is why
we came here. My brothers and I used to stay with an English family
in Brighton to learn English, and I was about three when we first
visited. My father had a house in Brighton as well, so we had
friends there.
BS: Your family have British citizenship,
dont they?
AD: Well we all do apart from Omar. He is a bit stubborn.
He made an application before he went travelling because he did
not want to do the application at the same time as everyone else.
Then, while his application was being processed, he was called
for an interview, but he was away, so we wrote to the Home Office
asking them to put the application on hold. Then all this happened.
BS: What response have you had from
the government?
AD: They were giving us very lame responses until quite
recently. We were getting standard letters saying things like,
We cant make any consular representation on his behalf
as a foreign national. He should appeal to his own country because
he is not a British citizen.
As a recognised refugee, Britain is supposed to be his surrogate
state and protect him. For him to appeal to Libya is just ridiculous
because of our history. It is just not an option for the family,
especially for him because he is religious and he is known to
be religious.
BS: How much support have you received here in the UK?
AD: People in Brighton and people in general have been
really supportive. We didnt speak about it for a long time,
because it is a very private thing. Its not easy to go around
telling everybody about it. You dont know whether they are
going to be horrible or nice. But since we came out and spoke
about it three months ago, its been really good.
There have been lots of activities in Brighton organised to
support Omar, including meetings, demonstrations and newspaper
articles. So much so that the council in Brighton passed a motion
calling on the British government to recommend to the Americans
that they should either try or release him. It was almost a unanimous
vote, with only two or three dissenters. In the end, Baroness
Symons from the Foreign Office invited a member of my family and
Clive Stafford Smith to meet up with her.
BS: What about people in your neighbourhood?
AD: So many people are sympathetic, saying how terrible
they feel for Omar and how they are so outraged that this is happening.
And they are shocked that it is someone from Brighton that is
going through this. People think it is something that happens
on some weird planet. Local groups have been doing a lot of work
to publicise Omars case.
It is so nice and heart-warming to see that people do care,
because I think if you just watch the media and listen to the
rubbish that a lot of the politicians come out with, you would
think nobody does.
BS: What do you think about the changes that are happening
in Britain, the new laws that are being introduced, where people
can be imprisoned in their own homes without charge?
AD: It is really shocking. I am horrified because having
lived in a country like Libya where there are no such protectionswhere
people can just be picked up anywhere because of something they
said, or something someone else said they said, or because of
something they didit could be anything. Perhaps they had
a conversation where they maybe said that something wasnt
quite right with the country. I am very anxious that these things
are happening here. You cant say it is like Libya, but it
is dangerousit is a slippery slope.
We are talking about rights that people have fought for years
to win. I really hope that it does not change, because thats
how the Nazi regime started.
See Also:
Britain: house arrest legislation
a fundamental attack on democratic rights
[4 March 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |