|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
The Abramoff affair: Corruption scandal threatens Republican
control of US Congress
By Patrick Martin
29 November 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Michael Scanlon, a Republican political operative, publicist
and former press spokesman for House Majority Leader Tom DeLay,
pled guilty November 21 to conspiring with lobbyist Jack Abramoff
to bribe a Republican congressman and cheat several American Indian
tribes out of tens of millions of dollars.
Scanlons guilty pleaand even more his agreement
to cooperate fully with federal prosecutors and testify against
former colleagueshas sent a chill through Republican ranks
and raised the prospect of numerous indictments, convictions and
jail terms for congressmen and congressional staffers as well
as Bush administration officials involved in the rampant corruption
of official Washington.
By the end of last week, there were press reports that at least
four Republican legislators and 17 staffers and former staffers
were the targets of the Justice Department investigation into
the Abramoff affair. The Wall Street Journal named DeLay,
Congressman Robert Ney of Ohio, Congressman John Doolittle of
California, and Senator Conrad Burns of Montana as targets, as
well as several former Bush administration officials. The Washington
Post reported that prosecutors had informed Congressman Ney
that he was the subject of a bribery investigation and added that
the wives of DeLay and Doolittle had also been linked to Abramoffs
influence-peddling schemes.
The Abramoff affair could have much wider implications. A reporter
for BusinessWeek, on a television interview program, said
that his Justice Department sources had told him that as many
as 60 congressmen could be implicated in the bribery scandalfar
more than enough to threaten control over the House of Representatives,
where the Republican majority is 231-202, with one independent.
The Associated Press named eight more congressmen and senators
who received contributions engineered by Abramoff in return for
political favors, four Republicans and four Democrats. The Republicans
were congressmen Charles Taylor of North Carolina, J. D. Hayworth
of Arizona, Todd Tiahrt of Kansas and Dave Camp of Michigan. The
Democrats included three senators, Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow
of Michigan and Byron Dorgan of North Dakota (the senior Democrat
on the committee now investigating the Abramoff affair), and Congressman
Dale Kildee of Michigan.
Previous press accounts have noted that House Speaker Dennis
Hastert of Illinois, a Republican, and the leading Democrat in
the Senate, Minority Leader Harry Reid, received substantial campaign
contributions from groups directed by Abramoff, most of them Indian
tribes seeking congressional favors for their casino gambling
operations.
While some of these contributions went to leading Democrats,
particularly members of the Indian Affairs committees of both
houses, the bulk of the cash went to the Republicansboth
because they had the deciding role, as the majority party in both
houses, and because Abramoff built his lobbying empire on his
longstanding ties to top Republican figures like DeLay, chief
Bush political aide Karl Rove, anti-tax lobbyist Grover Norquist
and Ralph Reed, former head of the Christian Coalition.
When Abramoff was president of the National College Republicans
in the mid-1980s, his two top deputies were Norquist and Reed.
All three went on to prominent positions in far-right politics.
Abramoff turned to lobbying for the Nicaraguan contras and anti-communist
terrorist groups in southern Africa, and then, especially after
the Republican takeover of Congress in 1994, to lobbying for commercial
and business interests.
With the installation of the Bush administration, the well-connected
Republican lobbyist could virtually name his price for influence-peddling,
and he rapidly became a multi-millionaire wheeler-dealer, representing,
among other companies, Tyco International and Unisys Corp.
The essential mechanism of Abramoffs operations, as detailed
in press accounts and Senate hearings over the past 18 months,
was to plunder the extensive lobbying funds provided by Indian
tribes with lucrative gambling operations. Abramoff directed much
of these funds to Scanlon, who left DeLays office in 2000
to set up a publicity firm in Washington to cash in on his high-level
Republican connections. Scanlon then kicked back half the profits
secretly to Abramoff.
From 2001 to 2004, according to documents filed in federal
court in Washington DC, Abramoff and Scanlon together raked in
some $82 million in payments from the Indian tribes. Scanlon himself
billed four Indian tribes $53 million during this period, while
kicking back $19 million under the table to Abramoff.
The 35-year-old Scanlon, who was still paying off college loans
from his congressional staff salary in 1999, became a millionaire
overnight, buying several million dollars in beachfront property
in Delaware shortly after going into business for himself. Five
years later, even after agreeing to $19 million in restitution
to the tribes, according to one press account, he still retains
significant personal wealth.
Abramoff manipulated the Native American tribes, using his
influence with Christian fundamentalist groups opposed to gambling
in order to extract what amounted to political protection money.
In the most notorious case, Abramoff mobilized the Christian fundamentalists
to spike the bid of a smaller Indian tribe to establish a casino
that would have undercut the profits of his clients, the Louisiana
band of Coushatta Indians.
The Coushattas hired Abramoff and Scanlon to shut down a casino
run by the Jena band, another Louisiana tribe, at Livingston,
Texas, on the Texas-Louisiana border. At Abramoffs direction,
the Coushattas funneled money to various Republican political
action committees and conservative groups, including two campaign
committees run by DeLay, ARMPAC and TRMPAC.
Abramoff and Scanlon used Ralph Reed as their contact with
Christian right groups and also contacted John Cornyn, then the
Texas attorney general, now a US Senator, seeking legal action
to block the Jena casino. Reed organized a group of 50 pastors
to meet with Cornyn. He subsequently told Abramoff in an e-mail,
We have also choreographed Cornyns response. The AG
will state that the law is clear... and pledge to take swift action
to enforce the law. The ministers were reportedly unaware
that their moral outrage at gambling was being used to aid one
gambling interest against another.
Even more brazen was the effort of Abramoff and Scanlon to
funnel millions of dollars through Reed for a campaign to shut
down the El Paso, Texas casino run by the Tigua tribe. After the
casino was shut down, Abramoff and Scanlon induced the Tiguas
to hire them to wage a campaign to allow the casinos reopening.
Although the Tiguas paid out millions, however, this effort failed.
Abramoff and Scanlon discussed their devious operations in
language of unvarnished cynicism, as revealed in e-mail exchanges
made public by the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. In one memo
to Abramoff, Scanlon wrote, referring to the Christian fundamentalists:
The wackos get their information through the Christian right,
Christian radio, mail, the internet and telephone trees. Simply
put, we want to bring out the wackos to vote against something
and make sure the rest of the public lets the whole thing slip
past them.
This could serve as a crude but nonetheless telling summary
of the entire political strategy of the Bush administration: mobilize
the wackos while keeping everyone else in the dark.
While there has been substantial media publicity over Abramoffs
gulling of the Indian tribes, the Republican lobbyist has been
indicted so far only in an unrelated case of business swindling
in south Florida, when he and an associate took control of SunCruz,
a cruise line that offered gambling tours, using allegedly fraudulent
financial information and bad checks.
With Scanlons testimony, however, an indictment for swindling
the Indian tribes could be forthcoming shortly. The most recent
Wall Street Journal and Washington Post accounts
reveal that the Justice Department task force looking into the
influence-peddling cases has grown to 35-40 people, suggesting
that multiple high-level criminal cases could be brought.
Particularly ominous, from the standpoint of targeted congressmen,
is the prospect that criminal bribery charges could be brought
over campaign contributions, even though the cash did not go directly
into the congressmens pockets, but to finance their reelection
efforts. The whole purpose of the elaborate Federal Election Commission
ritual has been to legalize the escalating financial subsidies
from corporate interests to legislators.
One of Abramoffs favorite tactics was to hire the wives
of congressional staffers or of the congressmen themselves, providing
what amounted to a direct payoff under the cover of employment.
One Abramoff-linked company, Alexander Strategy Group, run by
former DeLay staffers Edwin Buckham and Tony Rudy, hired Christine
DeLay, the congressmans wife, to determine the favorite
charity of every member of Congress, according to a Washington
Post account. This not terribly complex jobpresumably
435 phone calls would have sufficedresulted in payments
to Christine DeLay of $3,200 to $3,400 a month for three years,
for a total of $115,000. The DeLays family lawyer, Richard
Cullen, told the Post, It wasnt like she did
this 9 to 5, but it was an ongoing project. This was something
that she found to be very interesting, very challenging and very
worthwhile.
As the criminal information published by the Justice Department
in connection with Scanlons guilty plea states, the contributions
to the congressional campaign funds as well as personal gifts,
such as Super Bowl tickets, vacation trips, and expensive restaurant
meals, were in exchange for a series of official acts.
These included passing legislation, agreeing to put statements
into the Congressional Record, contacting federal officials to
influence decisions, meeting with Abramoffs clients, and
awarding contracts for improvements in congressional office buildings.
While the Republican lobbyist has so far only been indicted
in the Florida case, and has not yet been convicted of any crime,
the details flooding out into the media demonstrate the extraordinarily
corrupt alliance of Christian fundamentalists, Jewish ultra-Zionists,
anti-tax zealots and rabid neo-conservative ideologues in the
service of corporate America.
The scandalthe word is unavoidable but inadequate, since
it is here describing the rule, not the exception, in todays
Washingtonreaches into the highest rungs of the Republican
Party leadership and the Bush administration. DeLay, forced to
step down as House Majority Leader after his indictment on an
unrelated political corruption case in Texas, is the first top-level
casualty. He once described Abramoff as one of my closest
and dearest friends.
A mid-level White House official, David Safavian, chief procurement
officer at the Executive Office and previously chief of staff
at the General Services Administration, was indicted last month
on charges that he lied to federal investigators about a junket
he took with Abramoff, Reed and Congressman Ney to Scotland.
There may well be further White House reverberations. According
to documents released November 9, Abramoff sought a $9 million
payment from the West African nation of Gabon to arrange a meeting
with President Bush. Abramoff asked for the money to be paid through
wire transfers to a company he controlled privately, rather than
to the lobbying firm of Greenberg Traurig, where he was then employed.
President Omar Bongo met with Bush in the Oval Office 10 months
later, but there has as yet been no confirmation that he either
made the payment to Abramoff or received the invitation in return.
White House officials denied any connection, claiming that the
Bongo visit was part of the presidents outreach to
the continent of Africa.
See Also:
The Abramoff affair: Snapshots from an
empire of corruption
[29 November 2005]
Uproar in US Congress over Iraq withdrawal
vote
[21 November 2005]
Political conflict intensifies over Bushs
Iraq war lies
[19 November 2005]
Senate Democrats back Iraq war, Guantánamo
prison camp
[16 November 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |