|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
California Special Election: voters reject right-wing measures
By Andrea Peters
10 November 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
In a show of opposition to the right-wing policies pursued
by Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, voters in California
rejected all of the initiatives backed by the former action hero
turned politician in Tuesdays Special Election. The results
of the vote dealt a serious blow to the political prospects of
the Schwarzenegger administration, which has seen its approval
ratings collapse over the course of the past year.
In addition to the measures backed by Schwarzenegger, there
were four other initiatives on the Special Election ballot. All
of these were also voted down. Turnout for the election was 40
percent, a 5 percent decline from the recall election that landed
Schwarzenegger in office in 2003.
The four initiatives on the ballot that had the support of
the Governor included the Spending Cap Initiative
(Proposition 76), the Teacher Tenure Initiative (Proposition
74), the Redistricting Initiative (Proposition 77)
and the Union Paycheck Initiative (Proposition 75).
Proposition 76 was overwhelmingly rejected by voters, with
62 percent of those who went to the polls voting no
compared to 38 percent voting yes. The initiative
would have significantly limited the ability of the State Legislature
to increase budget appropriations and allowed the Governor to
impose mid-year budget cuts by executive fiat.
The Republican Party viewed Proposition 76 as a critical stepping-stone
in its efforts to further attack government-funded social programs
in California. In addition, it wanted to use the Spending
Cap Initiative to bolster support for similar initiatives
in other states.
Voters also dealt a stinging blow to Schwarzeneggers
attempt to alter the way in which election districts are drawn
in the state through the Redistricting Initiative.
Sixty percent of those who went to the polls opposed Proposition
77 compared to 40 percent who approved. Like the Spending
Cap Initiative, Proposition 77 was a hobbyhorse of the California
Republican Party. Through this initiative, these layers sought
to transform the political map in the state, breaking up Democratic
electoral majorities.
The geographical distribution of no votes in the
states counties reveals that a majority of voters in nearly
all of Californias diverse regions opposed Proposition 76
and 77. In San Francisco and the surrounding counties, opposition
to the Spending Cap Initiative was as high as 75-85
percent. In Los Angeles, the states largest urban area,
66 percent of voters rejected Proposition 76. Apart from a handful
of rural counties in the underpopulated mountainous Sierra Nevada
region, the only other area where a majority of voters approved
Proposition 76 was Orange County. However, even this long-standing
Republican stronghold could muster only 56 percent support for
the initiative.
The margins of opposition for Propositions 74 and 75 were smaller
than those for Proposition 76 and 77. Nonetheless, both were rejected.
Fifty-five percent of voters cast a no ballot for
the Teacher Tenure Initiative, which would have increased
the time it takes teachers in the public school system to achieve
tenure from two to five years. Similarly, Proposition 75, the
initiative that would have forced public employee unions to secure
the annual written consent of each member prior to using his or
her dues towards any political campaign, was rejected by 54 percent
of voters.
Californias public employee unions and their allies in
the Democratic Party spent nearly $50 million to ensure the defeat
of Proposition 75, which up until a month ago was leading in the
polls. Even with this enormous sum of money, the Union Paycheck
Initiative was only rejected by a margin of 4 percentage
points, indicating the depth of distrust that many Californians
have for the political agenda of the trade unions.
In addition, voters also rejected those initiatives on the
ballot that were not backed by Schwarzenegger.
Proposition 73, which would have required parental notification
before a minor could receive an abortion and would have changed
the California Constitution to define abortion as the killing
of an unborn child, was defeated by a vote of 53 percent
to 47 percent. Proposition 73 was a favorite of the Christian
right, which attempted to manipulate the genuine concern of parents
in order to attack a womens rights.
The two initiatives on the ballot that dealt with prescription
drug costs were also voted down. Fifty-nine percent of voters
rejected Proposition 78 and a similar number, 61 percent, rejected
Proposition 79. Proposition 78 would have created a discount-drug
program for low-income individuals that drug companies could join
on a voluntary basis. The pharmaceutical industry spent $80 million
in advertisements calling for a yes vote on Proposition
78 and a no vote on Proposition 79, which would have
forced drug companies participating in Californias Medi-Cal
program to offer their products at a discounted rate.
Voters also rejected Proposition 80, which if passed would
have led to the re-regulation of the energy industry in California.
Sixty-six percent of those who went to the polls voted no
on the initiative, compared to 34 percent voting yes.
The opposition to Propositions 79 and 80, which had the support
of the trade unions and the Democratic Party, is an expression
of the general hostility that ordinary people feel toward the
political establishment as a whole. The inability of the unions
and the Democrats to rally voters behind these initiatives indicates
that the rejection of the Schwarzenegger administration was largely
fueled by hostility toward the Governors policies and not
support for the agenda of the Democratic Party.
The Schwarzenegger administration called the Special Election
in June of this year in a last-ditch attempt to shore up the Governors
declining approval ratings and force through a series of right-wing
measures that could not be passed via the normal political process.
By launching a media campaign that portrayed Schwarzenegger as
an outsider attempting to clean up politics in Sacramento, the
Republican Party believed it could both revitalize the waning
support for the Governor and stampede the population into supporting
initiatives that would further attack the living standards and
democratic rights of working people.
However, this tactic failed. Instead, the Special Election
became a referendum on the Schwarzenegger administration and its
slavishly pro-business agenda.
On Tuesday evening, the Governor gave a humiliating speech
that, while failing to acknowledge his defeat in the election,
thanked those who voted against his initiatives for participating
in the political process. He made an appeal to his political opponents
and the voters who rejected his agenda to put their animosity
aside and continue working to solve the states problems.
The outcome of the Special Election represents not simply a
rebuke of Schwarzeneggers Year of Reform agenda,
which he announced with great fanfare in January of this year,
but a rejection of right-wing policies as a whole. While the Democratic
Party postured as an opponent of the Schwarzenegger administration
in the battle over the propositions on the November 8 ballot,
it too has pursued right-wing policies in the state for years.
The outcome from Tuesdays vote will only deepen the political
crisis facing Schwarzenegger and the political establishment as
a whole, which has no progressive solution to the deteriorating
social conditions facing masses of people in California.
See Also:
Right-wing initiatives dominate California
special election
[7 November 2005]
The California Union Paycheck Initiative
and the political tasks facing the working class
[2 November 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |