|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
Elderly woman becomes another victim of Australian immigration
policy
By Marco Trevisiol and Will Marshall
1 October 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The death of 79-year-old Syrian woman Aziza Agha is another
tragedy produced by the Australian governments inhumane
immigration policies.
Aziza arrived in Melbourne from Lebanon in September 2004 to
visit her children and grandchildren and was granted a six-month
visitors visa. Her health deteriorated, however, and she
became increasingly frail. She was suffering from diabetes, arthritis
and iron deficiency and was unsteady on her feet.
After her visa ran out, Azizas family sought a six-month
extension as she was not fit to return to Lebanon. But the Immigration
Department refused the request and would only renew the visa on
a monthly basis, eventually insisting that she travel to its offices
for a medical examination.
Her own doctor, Chris Towie, became increasingly concerned
about Azizas health. He sent letters to the Immigration
Department warning that she was unfit to travel from the outer
suburb of Broadmeadows to the city centre. He requested that she
be examined in her own home.
The Immigration Department ignored Towies advice and
Aziza was forced on August 8 to make the trip to the city. She
died two days later.
Azizas case may never have come to light had it not been
for Towies efforts to publicise the issue. He was so convinced
that her treatment had been a contributing factor to her death
that he included harassment by the Immigration Department
on her death certificate.
Towie commented that the mistreatment of Aziza was so
serious ... that it may be a criminal act to have required her
to attend in such a manner. He referred the matter to the
Victorian Coroner. On August 31, an additional investigation by
the Commonwealth Ombudsman was announced.
The Immigration Department has refused to accept any responsibility
for Azizas death. A statement issued by the Department affirmed
that its doctor had declared she was fit to travel [back
to Lebanon] subject to provision of a non-medical escort (probably
family), wheelchair access to the aircraft and possibly supplemental
oxygen during the flight.
Given Azizas medical condition, the decision to compel
her to fly home to Lebanon amounted to a virtual death sentence.
She died before it could be carried out. Towie attempted to contact
the Health Services Australia doctor responsible for Azizas
examination to ask why there was such a huge discrepancy between
their assessments, but was given the run around.
The tragic death of Aziza is not an isolated incident. The
Immigration Departments callous indifference to her ill
health is simply a reflection of the longstanding policy of successive
Labor and Liberal-National governments to enforce stringent immigration
restrictions using the most draconian methods.
The Howard government has locked up hundreds of refugees, including
women and children, indefinitely under the mandatory detention,
without any legal rights. Police and immigration officials routinely
raid workplaces and homes to seize and deport so-called illegal
immigrants.
The government has proven utterly insensitive to the plight
of refugees and immigrants, dismissing protests inside detention
centres and growing opposition outside to the inhumane regime.
It was compelled to make minor modifications to its policy after
it came to light that an Australian permanent resident, Cornelia
Rau, who was suffering from a psychological illness, was locked
up for months as an unlawful non-citizen. Other cases
have since come to light, including that of Vivian Alvarez, a
seriously ill Australian citizen who was deported to the Philippines.
The Liberal-National government, like previous Labor governments,
has sought to make scapegoats out of asylum seekers and illegal
immigrants. By blaming them for the lack of jobs, housing and
social services, Howard has sought to stir up fears and anxieties
and deflect attention from the devastating impact of his governments
policies on living standards.
Aziza was not a refugee or illegally in Australia. Yet such
is the regime that has been put in place that all visitors, particularly
from the Middle East or Asia, are regarded as potential visa-overstayers
and treated accordingly. Given the record of the Immigration Department,
it is not surprising that its officials ignored Azizas doctor
advice and declared her fit to fly home. After Azizas death,
her family received official notification that she had two weeks
to leave the country.
The World Socialist Web Site spoke to Dr Chris Towie
about Azizas death.
WSWS: Can you outline Aziza Aghas condition before
her death?
CT: After a few months of her arrival I told the family
not to bring her here anymore as it would be frightening just
to travel here. I visited her several times and I would also see
her incidentally when I saw other members of the family. Two things
have to be kept in mind as far as her death is concerned. There
was the concern about her medical condition but inevitably, social
circumstances impact on any medical condition. Her temporary visa
was expiring. The family was concerned and I couldnt imagine
her travelling. Elderly people become emotionally dependent upon
those around them when they are sick. You could see that Aziza
was scared. She was nervous. She clutched my hand at one of my
last visits and said, I dont think I can cope.
She looked distracted. She even called me Habibe, which is like
a plea to an authority for assistance. She also begged, Please
dont let them do this to me. I had written several
times to stop her being moved. On each occasion, the Immigration
Department had contacted me and I had discussed her condition.
The last certificate was to stop the Department from forcing her
to be examined in late July. On that certificate I wrote, The
patient is unfit to attend your offices due to frailty aggravated
by a respiratory infection all this week. Ideally she could be
seen at home.
And it surprised me that they didnt ring me. I assumed
theyd just accepted the certificate on its face value, and
that they were not going to continue with the attempt at deporting
her.
The Immigration Department initially denied that I had explicitly
stated that Aziza could not travel. That just wasnt true.
I had tested her condition and I saw that it took two people to
assist her simply to walk across the room. WSWS: What was
the response of the Immigration Department to your certificates?
CT: Without contacting me at all, the Immigration Department
informed the family that she was required to be in their offices.
But I had expressly said that she couldnt be moved.
The family was distressed when they were informed that the
Department was still insisting on seeing her. They felt hounded.
They were scared that she might be hauled off to a detention centre
or deported if they didnt comply. Many people from Middle
Eastern origins have a real fear of that. They have come from
places where that same political climate of gross violations of
human rights has predominated.
The Department later said that I had claimed she would need
oxygen and a wheelchair. That is not the case either. I said nothing
of the sort. I simply said that she was unfit to attend. They
definitely understood.
Someone has blood on their hands and should be held accountable.
As Australians, we have to stand up and not tolerate this. Medical
advice has been ignored. There was definitely no need for the
haste in the actions of the Immigration Department. She was absolutely
no risk and she wasnt going anywhere. Her family was straightforward
and co-operative to a fault.
WSWS: Do you see any connection between how Aziza Agha
was treated and the other recent cases such as Cornelia Rau who
was falsely detained by the Immigration Department?
CT: I have seen some terrible things happen to people.
But I think this is one of the most callous things to happen.
The political climate in Australia has become punitive and repressive,
targeting minorities such as migrants, refugees, Aboriginals,
the disabled, the elderly, gays and lesbians. These groups are
easy targets because they dont have the political muscle
or the money. Many of these people are victims in their own right
and they simply dont have the time to answer governments
who have millions of dollars.
I have actually dealt with many people who have been in detention
centres. You would think that they were from Third World prisons.
The use of solitary confinement as a punishment is simply torture.
What can you say?
I worked in the Philippines prior to the ousting of Marcos.
The guards at those prisons were more sympathetic than the guards
here. The people I treated have adjustment disorders that last
for years after they are released. They are severely traumatised,
as if they had come from a Nazi camp.
These are concentration camps in Australia. Prisoners are there
only because of some visa infringement and they are punished violently
for years. Australia has its own Abu Graibs. It is important that
the medical profession advocates for the poorer of society.
See Also:
Callous maltreatment of refugees
in Australian detention centres
[4 August 2005]
A cynical twist in Australias
mandatory refugee detention regime
[4 April 2005]
Australian woman imprisoned
for 10 months as an illegal immigrant
[9 February 2005]
Australia: Howard
government cynically "tweaks" its anti-refugee policy
[31 August 2004]04]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |