|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
US Senate resumes attack on antiwar MP George Galloway
By Julie Hyland
27 October 2005
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
British antiwar MP George Galloway has denounced a US Senate
subcommittees claim that he lied under oath when he rejected
assertions that he had received money from the Iraqi oil-for-food
programme. He has accused Republican Senator Norm Coleman, chairman
of the subcommittee, of mounting a political vendetta.
The subcommittees latest report charges Galloway with
personally soliciting and receiving eight oil allocations totalling
23 million barrels from the Hussein government between 1999 and
2003. It alleges that at least £252,000 was channelled to
Galloways Mariam Appeal, opposing sanctions against Iraq,
through its chairman, Jordanian businessman Fawaz Zureikat. Galloway
is said to have knowingly made false or misleading statements
under oath when he appeared before the subcommittee.
The report also says that Galloways estranged wife Dr.
Armineh Abu-Zayyad received £85,000 in connection with one
allocation of oil, again through Zureikat.
Galloway has stressed that the supposed fresh evidence presented
by Coleman on October 24 consists almost exclusively of allegations
apparently made by Iraqs former deputy prime minister Tariq
Aziz, Vice President Taha Yasin Ramadan and oil minister Amer
Rashid, who have been in jail since the US invasion of Iraq.
The MP has challenged the Senate subcommittee to sue him for
perjury and for Coleman to debate him in a venue of his choosing
in his home state of Minnesota.
The allegations are largely a restating of the charges previously
made against Galloway by the subcommittee, which also focused
on his connections with Zureikat. Galloway has freely admitted
that Zureikat provided funds to the Mariam Appeal and that he
did not know where they had originated.
In May, the subcommittee issued a report naming Galloway as
a beneficiary of oil allocations under the UN programme, just
days after his election as MP for the Respect-Unity Coalition
on an antiwar ticket. Galloway, who had successfully challenged
similar allegations by the Daily Telegraph and the Christian
Science Monitor in court, insisted on refuting the subcommittees
charges in person.
His May 17 appearance before the committee, in which he denounced
the US and British governments illegal war against Iraq
and described the charges against him as the mother of all
smokescreens, was shown around the world. Responding to
claims that he had met repeatedly with Saddam Hussein, he told
the subcommittee, As a matter of fact, I have met Saddam
Hussein exactly the same number of times as [US Secretary of Defence]
Donald Rumsfeld met him. The difference is Donald Rumsfeld met
him to sell him guns and to give him maps the better to target
those guns.
Coleman has admitted that the subcommittees decision
to pursue Galloway was motivated by an effort to refute his earlier
testimony and that the additional evidence ... demonstrates
that the testimony Mr. Galloway provided to the subcommittee was
false and misleading.
A Senate aide told the media that the charges would be referred
to the US Justice Department for investigation of possible perjury,
false statements and obstruction of a congressional proceedinginfractions
that carry a sentence of up to five years imprisonment and a $250,000
fine. The report has also been passed on to British authorities.
In response, Galloway said, The evidence is statements
made by people on trial for genocide and now living in the dungeons
of the American occupation in Iraq. Knowing what we do about what
happens to people in those dungeons, you dont have to be
a genius to work out why, after May, they would get somebody to
say what they want them to say.
He reiterated, There is not a shred of truth in any of
these allegations. There has been no impropriety and I have not
received even one thin dime from the oil-for-food programme.
Galloway demanded Coleman put up or shut up. I
am demanding prosecution, I am begging for prosecution,
he said. I am saying if I have lied under oath in front
of the senate, thats a criminal offence. Charge me and I
will head for the airport right now and face them down in court
as I faced them down in the Senate room.
Because I publicly humiliated this lickspittle Senator
Norman Colemanone of Bushs right-hand menin
the US Senate in May, this sneak revenge attack has been launched
over the past 24 hours.
The MP said he was unaware of the £84,000 allegedly deposited
into his estranged wifes bank account by Zureikat: These
are allegations about my soon to be ex-wife, who divorced me on
the front pages of the Sunday Times five days before the
last general election.
Dr. Armineh Abu-Zayyad has rejected the allegation against
her, stating, I have never solicited or received from Iraq
or anyone else any proceeds of any oil deals, either for myself
or for my former husband.
For his part, Zureikat told the Independent, I
have been to Washington, New York and Texas travelling on my own
passport with the knowledge of American officials. No one wanted
to question me. I have restarted my business with Iraq and I have
an office there. Iraqi officials have encouraged me to continue
doing business.
I have had meetings with American officials. They wanted
to talk to me about Iraq before the war, but oil did not come
up and George Galloway did not come up. I asked them to check
me out and they said they had done that and there were no problems.
Galloways assistant Ron McKay also challenged the validity
of the witness statements. Tariq Aziz has been in custody
and we know from his lawyer this Senate committee offered him
a dealjust what I do not know, whether reduced charges or
freedom. He said that it was ironic that Aziz,
Yasin and Saddam are being accused, on the one hand, of being
homicidal maniacs and on the other of being relied upon to give
a true and accurate statements uncoerced.
Today a United Nations investigation, headed by Paul Volcker,
former chairman of the US Federal Reserve, will issue its own
report into companies and individuals alleged to have received
oil allocations.
Galloway has already stated that he was given an advance copy
of the Volcker inquirys findings, and that it concluded
that he had received no money.
See Also:
British MP Galloway blasts
US Senate on Iraqi oil probe
[19 May 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |