|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America : Canada
Canada: Security certificates overturn long-standing democratic
rights
By François Tremblay
11 April 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Two recent events have underlined the anti-democratic nature
of the Canadian states security certificates
and the determination of the new Conservative government to intensify
the assault on long-established democratic rights that its predecessor,
the Chrétien-Martin Liberal government, initiated in the
name of the war on terrorism.
The first is the announcement that a special prison will be
constructed to hold those detained under a security certificatea
legal document that authorizes the government to imprison indefinitely
and without charge any non-Canadian citizen it deems a threat
to national security.
The special prison will be constructed within an existing maximum-security
penitentiary in Kingston, Ontario. It will be used to indefinitely
incarcerate people who are presently detained under security certificates
at a number of other locations and any new persons whom federal
authorities designate a security threat.
Sections of the press have rightly drawn a parallel between
the special prison under construction in Kingston and the concentration
camp to which the Bush administration has disappeared alleged
enemy combatants in Guantanamo, Cuba, labeling the
planned Canadian facility North Guantanamo or Guantanamo
Lite.
Four individuals will soon be transferred to the new prison:
Mohamed Harkat, detained since December 2002; Hassan Almrei, detained
since October 2001; Mahmoud Jaballah, detained since August 2001;
and Mohammad Majhoud, detained since June 2000. Majhoud staged
a 79-day hunger strike in 2005 to obtain basic medical care and
the right to receive monthly visits from his two children, aged
six and eight.
In the new prison, Majhoud and the other detainees will likely
face even harsher conditions. Although it is being built inside
the walls of the Kingston penitentiary, the new facility will
remain completely separate from it. At all times, prisoners held
there will be segregated from the regular inmates of the Kingston
penitentiary and, most probably, from each other. The authorities
are refusing even to reveal the size of the cells in which the
security-certificate detainees will be held.
The second event that merits note is the mid-March decision
of a Federal Court judge upholding the deportation of security-certificate
detainee Mahmoud Jaballah to Egypt, where he faces possible torture
and execution. Judge Mackay invoked the security certificate issued
against Jaballah as grounds for refusing to grant him asylum and
authorizing his deportation.
In his decision, Judge Mackay claimed that evidence indicated
Jaballah shouldnt receive Canadas protection as a
refugee because he posed too much of a risk to national security.
The evidence to which the judge refers has never been divulged
to Jaballah or to his lawyers, who suspect that at least some
of it comes from people tortured in foreign prisons. The use of
such evidence was authorized by the Canadian government
in the anti-terrorist legislation it rushed through parliament
following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Judge Mackay admitted that his decision violates the International
Convention Against Torture. The Convention, signed by Canada,
forbids deportation to a country that practices torture under
any and all circumstances. But, Mackay added, even if it might
be a useful interpretive tool, the Convention doesnt apply
to persons considered a threat to national security. The decision
in Jaballahs case marks the third time that the Federal
Court has refused to grant asylum to someone detained on a security
certificate even while admitting that its decision may result
in the rejected refugee-claimant facing torture and death in a
foreign country.
Arbitrary detention
Under Canadas security-certificate regime, the minister
of public security is empowered to issue a ministerial decree,
based on information provided by the security services, naming
an individual who is a visitor to Canada, a refugee applicant,
or a landed immigrant a potential threat to national security.
The person named in such a security certificate can then be arrested
and held indefinitely without any charge being laid against them
and without any access to the information that reputedly shows
they are a threat to national security.
Illegal combatant or threat to national securityin
both cases, the person so designated is denied legal rights historically
guaranteed to all who are detained, such as the right to know
the exact nature of the actions alleged and of the crime committed,
the right to be brought before a judge and be heard by an impartial
and public court, and the right to be presumed innocent.
In 2005, the Federal Court concluded that security certificates
were constitutional, indicating at the same time that, whether
in the name of national security or diplomatic convenience (i.e.,
maintaining friendly relations with countries where torture takes
place), whole sections of evidence can be withheld from public
examination and remain the sole property of the security agencies
and the judges. As a last resort, the executive can impose an
absolute veto on revealing any of the evidence, even over the
objections of the courts themselves.
This decision of the Federal Court has been appealed, and the
Supreme Court is to issue its ruling in the coming months. But
already in 2002, Canadas highest court ruled that deportation
of persons facing torture and death is permitted in exceptional
cases.
Following September 11, 2001, the Canadian government passed
a slew of anti-terrorist legislation, modifying many laws, including
the Criminal Code and immigration laws, with the goal of undermining
long-standing democratic principles and opening the door to authoritarian
methods of governing.
Security certificates were on the law books prior to September
11, but it is only after this date that they became a regular
instrument in the governments purported war on terrorism.
The definition of terrorism, it need be added, has been dramatically
expanded to the point where someone who has neither committed
nor planned a terrorist act can be deemed a terrorist by the government,
if he or she has had links with an organization that the government
has categorized as terrorist. Thus, a person involved
in fund-raising or disseminating pamphlets for an organization
like the Kurdish nationalist PKK or the Liberation Tigers of Tamil
Eelam (LTTE) can be designated by the Canadian government to be
a terrorist and indefinitely incarcerated without the most basic
rights of due process.
Although security certificates have been denounced by numerous
international and national human rights organizations, the Canadian
government has announced its intention to expand their scope.
At present, the law does not permit the issuing of a certificate
against a Canadian citizen. The Conservative government intends
to modify this law and to gain the possibility of withdrawing
citizenship from anyone who obtained it fraudulentlyfor
instance, by hiding links with organizations categorized as terrorist.
Once again, any evidence would remain secret.
See Also:
Canada: Conservative Throne Speech promotes
social reaction and militarism
[8 April 2006]
Canadian prime minister proclaims
major shift with Afghanistan visit
[16 March 2006]
Canadian government
defends intelligence extracted through torture
[22 September 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |