|
WSWS : Arts
Review : Theater
A passionate exposure of the David Hicks case, with one glaring
omission
Honour Bound, co-designed and directed by Nigel Jamieson
By Richard Phillips
23 August 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Honour Bound, a 90-minute multimedia performance co-designed
and directed by Nigel Jamieson at the Sydney Opera House until
September 3 and Melbournes Malthouse Theatre from September
15 until October 1, dramatises the plight of David Hicks, a 31-year-old
Australian citizen imprisoned in Guantánamo Bay for almost
five years in violation of the Geneva Conventions and his basic
democratic rights.
Hicks was captured by Northern Alliance forces in Afghanistan
November 2001, just after the US-led invasion of the country.
He was sold to the US military, which transported him to Guantánamo
in January 2002. Since then Hicks, who had not broken any Australian
laws at the time of his seizure, has been subjected to physical
torture, ongoing psychological humiliation and extended periods
of total isolation.
Denied access to a lawyer for two years, until he was charged
in June 2004 under the now illegal US military commissions, Hicks
has been falsely accused of being an Al Qaeda terrorist and demonised
by the US and Australian governments and the corporate media.
Nigel Jamieson is a well-known figure in Australian performing
arts and a specialist in large-scale theatrical productions and
mass events. These include the Tin Symphony for the opening
of the 2000 Olympic Games in Sydney and the closing ceremony of
the 2002 Manchester Commonwealth Games. He has also produced Homelands,
an outdoor performance that explores the problems facing refugees
seeking asylum in Australia. Jamieson, who has been deeply concerned
about the growing assault on basic rights implemented under the
so-called war on terror, began working on Honour
Bound after watching the Curtis Levy documentary, The President
versus David Hicks. (See Honour
Bound director Nigel Jamieson speaks with WSWS.)
The productions title is from Honor Bound to Defend
Freedom, the motto of the US military joint task force that
runs Guantánamo military jail. As many commentators have
noted, the phrase bears a chilling resemblance in its bureaucratic
double-speak to Freedom is Slavery in Orwells
novel 1984 or Arbeit macht frei (Work will
free you), which adorned the gates of several of the Nazi concentration
camps.
Honour Bound, which was developed in consultation with
Terry Hicks, Davids father, is a passionate and at times
harrowing work. It is set inside a stark, eight-metre square cage-like
structure and involves six dancers attired in the infamous Guantánamo
bright orange boilersuits. The back wall, which is also used to
project video-footage and graphics, includes a small moveable
cage the same size as those used in Guantánamo. The dancers,
using a complex system of wires, leather straps and pulleys, are
able to run up and down the walls and other surfaces to create
an astonishing multi-dimensional effect. The show also touches
on Terry and Bev Hickss determined efforts to rescue their
son from Guantánamo and the tremendous pressures theyve
had to deal with and overcome.
The dance sequences, which were
developed by Garry Stewart, artistic director of the Australian
Dance Theatre, are complex and physically demanding. Dancers interchange
as prisoners and interrogators and are called upon to perform
a range of aerial maneouvres. Walls become floors, and vice versa;
elaborate lighting, sound design, and various other effects are
used to create some sense of the psychological disorientation
inflicted on the prisoners.
While the dancers have no dialogue, there is a narration which
supplements projected photographs of David Hicks and scenes from
Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo Bay, as well as animated texts
of the Geneva Convention, the Declaration of Human Rights, FBI
emails and American military torture manuals and various video
clips.
Honour Bound has many striking moments. The most memorable
is when one of the dancer/prisoners, who is suspended about two
and a half metres above the stage, appears to walk along the projected
text of the Geneva Conventions on the treatment of war prisoners.
Just before he reaches the end of the animated and moving words,
they suddenly flip over and he plummets to the floor, forced to
reclimb the wall and begin the process all over again.
Another scene symbolically portrays a young David Hicks attempting
to overcome a range of social and personal difficulties that he
faced at the time. Dancer and acrobat DJ Garner performs this
physically strenuous section of the production, hoisting himself
high above the stage against a backdrop of snapshots of Hicks
and video footage of his parents home. This scene not only
humanises Hicks, who continues to be slandered by the Howard government
and a small group of extreme right-wing Australian media commentators,
but helps to illustrate why he left Australia seeking adventure
and later converted to Islam.
Honour Bound is an artistically ambitious work that
powerfully recreates the claustrophobia, dashed hopes, despair
and moments of insanity that face Hicks and hundreds of other
Guantánamo prisoners every day. Audiences are confronted
on a range of emotional levels and the production makes it terrifyingly
clear that the Bush administrations treatment of prisoners
in Guantánamo is a war crime.
The production, however, has one serious and frustrating omissionit
fails to make clear that the Australian government is a co-conspirator
with Washington in Hickss incarceration and the quashing
of his basic legal rights.
As everyone knows, the Howard government slavishly endorsed
the US detention and torture of Hicks from the outset, in order
to demonstrate its loyalty to Washington and justify its participation
in the war on terror. Prime Minister Howard and his
senior ministers have shamelessly denied the mountain of evidence
from human rights organisations, lawyers and sections of the US
military and the FBI proving that Guantánamo prisoners
have been tortured. In fact, the Australian government is virtually
alone in backing these violations.
But apart from a passing reference by Bev Hicks to Australias
foreign minister Alexander Downer, and former defence minister
Robert Hill, and a brief concluding appeal by Terry Hicks for
the Australian government to do something to end the
illegal treatment of his son, Honour Bound does not mention
the Howard government. This is not accidental, given the detailed
research that went into the production and the passionate concern
of those involved, and is no doubt bound up with increasing government
pressure on writers, artists and filmmakers.
It is no secret that the Howard government has moved to silence
any critical voices in the state-funded Australian Broadcasting
Corporation and is acutely sensitive to any oppositional commentary
from artists and intellectuals. At the same time, cash-strapped
theatre companies, desperately in need of government grants to
keep operating, are nervous about the impact of any production
that directly challenges the governments right-wing agenda.
Over the past 12 months these pressures have intensified. Last
year Canberra reacted with great fury and anxiety to the Melbourne
Theatre Companys production of Hannie Raysons Two
Brothers, a political thriller that attempted to explore the
political psychology behind the Howard governments treatment
of refugees and asylum seekers. The play became the subject of
an unprecedentedand lengthycabinet meeting, with some
senior ministers demanding that the Arts Council, Australias
most important funding body, be shut down because it backed the
production.
In other measures, two dramatic works, one of them Wages
of Spin, an exposure of the political and media spin to justify
the war on Iraq, were denied tour funding. Late last year, Canberra
suddenly withdrew promised funds to a festival of Australian films
in Jakarta, the Indonesian capital, jeopardising the long-running
event, because it included Levys The President versus
David Hicks.
In this atmosphere, the reticence of the creators of Honour
Bound to make mention of the Howard governments role
is perhaps unsurprising, but none the more commendable. Things
need to be called by their proper names. No authoritarian or would-be
authoritarian regime has ever backed off because artists showed
forbearance. On the contrary, such an attitude only encourages
those in power.
Moreover, the reluctance to criticise the Howard government
represents a misreading of the present political situation and
underestimates the degree of hostility to its policies, on Hicks
and every other question. An open challenge by artists to the
government would receive widespread support and help clarify a
considerable layer of the population as to the real state of affairs.
Notwithstanding Jamiesons refusal to indict Canberra,
Honour Bound, which involves some of the countrys
finest dancers and multi-media directors and technicians, has
an objective significance. Above all, it is a measure of the governments
deep unpopularity and isolation.
Four and a half years ago, few Australian dramatists or choreographers
would have imagined themselves writing and directing a show about
the plight of Guantánamo prisoners. But today, such is
the extent of anger and opposition to the Howard government and
its assault on long-established democratic and legal rights, that
this sort of production is now being staged at the Sydney Opera
House, Australias most prestigious venue.
See Also:
Following US Supreme Court
ruling
Australian government demands new kangaroo court for
David Hicks
[7 July 2006]
Australian film festival audience
invites Mamdouh Habib to speak about Guantánamo documentary
[1 July 2006]
Media witch-hunts
Australian author Hannie Rayson and her new play
[5 May 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |