|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Bush authorizes recall of Marine reservists to Iraq
By Barry Grey
24 August 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
One day after President Bush told a White House press conference,
Were not leaving [Iraq] so long as Im the president,
the tragic meaning of his words for hundreds of American soldiers
and their families was spelled out by the Marine Corps announcement
that at least 1,200 inactive reservists will be recalled for combat
duty in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The involuntary recall, the first for Marine reservists since
the beginning of the Iraq war three-and-a-half years ago, was
authorized by Bush on July 26. It means that men and women who
have already fulfilled their four-year active duty commitment,
in some cases having already served two or three tours of combat
duty, will be forced to serve an additional tour of up to two
years duration.
The announcement stunned, saddened and angered millions of
Americans, including many soldiers and their families. A spokesperson
for Military Families Speak Out denounced the recall and called
for the immediate withdrawal of US troops from Iraq.
The Democratic Party, on the contrary, charged the Bush administration
with mismanaging the war by sending too few troops. Jack Reed
of Rhode Island, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services
Committee, said, The right way to address the issue is to
increase the size of the military so you do not have to rely on
the call-up of the individual ready reserve. We should have raised
the strength of the Army and Marine Corps three years ago...
Bushs authorization allows the Marines to recall up to
2,500 members of the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), which consists
of Marines with specific skills who left active duty and returned
to civilian life, but are obligated to serve if called. Aside
from the initial mandatory call-up at the start of the war, when
2,000 reservists were activated, the Marine Corps has up to now
relied on reservists voluntarily returning to active duty to fill
gaps in Iraq.
But as Col. Guy Stratton, who is in charge of the Marines
manpower mobilization plans, told reporters at the Pentagon Tuesday,
the number of reservists volunteering outside their active-duty
service requirement has been steadily declining for two years.
Stratton said the Marines planned for the present to recall
1,200 reservists, who will be assigned to military police, communications
and intelligence, and combat units. They are to report for duty
next spring.
He said the Marines would not call up ready reservists in the
first year, who just came off active duty, or those in the last
year. That leaves an available pool of some 36,000 out of 59,000
members of the Marine IRR.
While the presidents authorization allows for a maximum
call-up of 2,500 at any one time, it is open-ended. Repeated mandatory
call-ups could involve many thousands more reservists in the coming
months and years.
The authority is until GWOT (the Global War on Terrorism)
is over with, Stratton said. Until were told
otherwise, well use it. He added that the Marines
took the action because this is going to be a long war.
The Marine reserve call-up follows the Pentagons move
last week ordering 600 members of the US Armys 172nd Stryker
Brigade, who had either returned to their base in Alaska or were
about to board US-bound planes in Kuwait, to return to Iraq in
order to bolster US forces in Baghdad.
These stop-gap measures, along with Army recalls of reservists
and stop-loss orders extending the combat tours of
troops in Iraq, are signs of the deepening US military debacle
in Iraq, as well as the unraveling of the US puppet regime in
Afghanistan. More than three years into the Iraq war, the US has
secured little more than the fortified Green Zone in the capital,
and large parts of the countryside remain under the control of
resistance forces.
The result of the US invasion and occupation has been an eruption
of sectarian conflict and growing attacks by Iraqi fighters against
American and British troops. To date, Washingtons war of
aggression has cost the lives of more than 100,000 Iraqis and
over 2,600 American soldiers, with tens of thousands more wounded.
The New York Times on August 17 published a report on
the latest Defense Department indices of the catastrophe in Iraq:
the number of roadside bombs aimed mainly against American forces
reached an all-time high of 2,625 in July, as compared to 1,454
in January. The insurgency has gotten worse by almost all
measures, with insurgent attacks at historically high levels.
The insurgency has more public support and is demonstrably more
capable in numbers of people active and in its ability to direct
violence than at any point in time, a senior Defense Department
official told the newspaper.
The recourse to compulsory recalls of reservists and tour extensions
of active troops reflects as well the growing opposition to the
war not only in the general population, but also among the soldiers
themselves. One measure of the disaffection, demoralization and
outright opposition within the military was provided by Stars
and Stripes, the newspaper authorized by the Pentagon, which
noted that half of the Individual Ready Reserve members given
orders in 2004 by the Army asked for either a delay or an exemption
to the order. Hundreds of other IRR members failed to show up
at deployment stations when ordered to do so.
Some non-active duty soldiers have filed suit against the Pentagon
opposing their renewed call-up. Expressing a growing sentiment
among the troops, Paul Rieckhoff, founder of Iraq and Afghanistan
Veterans of America, told the Los Angeles Times: You
can send Marines back for a third or fourth time, but you have
to understand you are destroying their lives. He added,
The bottom line is: Everyone is exhausted.
The most recent New York Times/CBS News poll, reported
in Wednesdays Times, registered the growth
of antiwar sentiment among the American people as a whole. It
found that 51 percent of those surveyed saw no link between the
war in Iraq and what the newspaper called the broader anti-terror
effort, a jump of 10 percentage points since Junethis
despite an renewed effort by the Bush administration to link the
war in Iraq with the so-called war on terror.
Fifty-three percent said going to war was a mistake,
the Times reported, up from 48 percent in July; 62
percent said events were going somewhat or very badly
in the effort to bring order and stability to Iraq. The
poll showed Bushs overall standing as unchanged, with
57 percent disapproving and 36 percent approving.
The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the threat of new wars
against targets such as Syria and Iran, are the product of the
policies of both parties of American big business. Behind the
Democrats unwavering embrace of the so-called war
on terrorism is their support for the effort of American
imperialism to control the oil resources of the Middle East and
Central Asia, as part of its drive for global hegemony.
The inevitable response of both parties to the enormous strains
on the US military will be a move to revive the draft, in order
to provide the necessary pool of youth to use as military cannon
fodder. This is the unstated but inexorable logic of the demand
by Senator Reed, John Kerry and other leading Democrats for an
expansion of the military, and it is being echoed in Republican
circles.
Frederick W. Kagan, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise
Institute, hinted as much in an interview with the Los Angeles
Times. Kagan said, This administration needs to understand
that this is not a short-term problem, and it really needs a systemic
fix in the size of the ground forces.
See Also:
Bush press conference on Iraq: "We're
not leaving so long as I'm the president."
[23 August 2006]
Pentagon orders 300 returned troops back
to Iraq
[17 August 2006]
The president gives a press conference
[16 August 2006]
A grim milestone in the Iraq
war: 2,500th US military death
[17 June 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |