|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
Wadeye: a case study of the Australian governments Aboriginal
agenda
By Erika Zimmer
24 August 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Under the guise of concern for Aboriginal women and children,
the Howard government has seized upon revelations of sexual abuse
in indigenous communities, initially broadcast in an Australian
Broadcasting Corporation Lateline program in May,
to push through its right-wing agenda of ending welfare
dependence.
After the ABC program, Indigenous Affairs Minister Mal Brough
announced an audit of indigenous communities, with small,
unviable communities ... encouraged to pack up and leave.
The government intends to strip thousands of Aborigines of welfare
entitlements so as to push them out of remote communities and
into the real economy in towns and cities. The Australian
estimated that the audit would include 1,000 settlements with
fewer than 100 people.
Two Labor governmentsthose of Western Australia (WA)
and the Northern Territory (NT)are collaborating closely
with the federal Liberal-National Party government. The NT government
is to study 547 indigenous communities with a view to targeting
specific communities ... for resettlement or service reduction.
The WA government announced an audit of 300 indigenous communities.
These audits have nothing to do with gathering
information about the appalling conditions in remote communities,
let alone attempting to address their underlying causes. Broughs
spokesman rejected a call by the Australian Medical Association,
the doctors organisation, for a royal commission into the
health, land and social justice issues in remote Aboriginal
communities. Such an inquiry was not needed because
we know the magnitude of the problem and clear objectives
and practical initiatives had already been worked out.
What this agenda means in practice can be seen in the Aboriginal
township of Wadeye, 320 km southwest of the NT capital, Darwin.
It has faced the full glare of media attention following a riot
in May, allegedly involving hundreds of young people.
Surrounded by 20 outstations, Wadeye, formerly known as Port
Keats, is the town service centre of the Thamarrurr region. While
rich grazing lands south of the region, including the vast Victoria
River Downs station, were opened up to pastoral interests in the
late 1880s with devastating consequences for local Aboriginal
people, the poor grazing potential and difficult terrain of the
Thamarrurr region discouraged pastoral settlement.
Lacking an economic base and crippled by chronic government
underfunding, the regions conditions are comparable to some
of the worst in the Third World. For example, the median life
expectancy is 46 years, with death most commonly due to heart
disease, kidney problems or diabetes. Twenty percent of the children
are stunted, 21 percent are underweight and 10 percent wasted.
While approximately 800 children of school age live at Wadeye,
no high school exists. The sole Catholic primary school is able
to accommodate only 300 children. At the same time, a shortage
of housing means that up to 20 people live in each house.
Unemployment stands at 84 percent while the average personal
income for Aborigines is estimated variously at between $4,000
and $8,000 a year, less than 20 percent of the national average.
It is little wonder that Wadeye has the highest per capita juvenile
offending rate in the NT.
One cause of the appalling statistics, according to the communitys
legal representatives, Arnold Bloch Leibler, is the redirection
of hundreds of millions of dollars away from remote indigenous
communities. A detailed analysis undertaken in 2004 revealed that
Wadeye, the sixth largest town in the NT and the largest Aboriginal
town was being short-changed $4 million per year. According to
the National Indigenous Times, Wadeyes leaders are
preparing to sue federal and territory governments for several
decades of neglect.
But neither the Third World statistics, nor the lack of government
spending have rated any media scrutiny. Instead Wadeye first came
to national attention when Prime Minister Howard flew into the
town in April 2005, accompanied by a bevy of dignitaries and a
large media contingent, to impose a Shared Responsibility Agreement
(SRA) on the community.
Wadeye was one of eight remote communities selected nationally
as pilots for SRAs, which mark a step towards the
complete abolition of social spending and welfare benefits. They
make the provision of basic services and facilities, such as kidney-treatment
centres, petrol bowsers and air-conditioning, contingent on communities
carrying out activities such as rubbish disposal and increasing
school attendance rates.
This is not the first time that indigenous people are being
targeted for measures to be used against the entire working class.
The CDEP scheme of the 1970s, which imposed compulsory labour
requirements on unemployed Aboriginal workers and became the forerunner
for the 1990s Work for the Dole scheme.
One of the requirements of Wadeyes SRA was to boost school
numbers. A massive push by the local community saw school enrolments
soar towards 700 at the start of the school year 2005 and again
in 2006. But the shortage of desks, pens and teachers due to government
under-funding led to five out of every six students dropping out.
Taking advantage of the current media blitz, Brough sent a
senior official, Wayne Gibbons, to the town to issue an ultimatum:
residents would be stripped of government funding and welfare
payments unless, within a month, gang members repaired damaged
houses and parents sent their children to school.
Two elders walked out of the meeting with Gibbons. The Thamarrurr
Council wrote to Brough, describing Gibbons behaviour as
verging on just plain bullying and saying it would
need more than a month to repair the houses, given the extent
of the work involved.
In relation to every child must attend school every day,
we point out that we have 688 schoolchildren and a school facility
that can only hold 420, the council wrote. Your representative,
Mr Wayne Gibbons, came here and blamed us totally for the problems
we are having. Is this how one partner treats another, by coming
into their home and demanding unrealistic things and treating
them with disrespect?
In order to enforce the Howard governments objectives,
the NT government has joined in unleashing repressive law
and order measures against the people of Wadeye. In June
it attempted to ram through court hearings for more than 100 Wadeye
residentsmost of whom were arrested during the May riotover
just two days in Wadeyes tiny courtroom.
One 36-year-old resident was jailed for two months and scores
of others face months or years in prison. Legal proceedings were
placed on hold after defence lawyers for two of the men charged
argued they had no case to answer.
On the eve of the hearings, NT Police Minister Paul Henderson
unveiled legislation providing for greater police powers and harsher
penalties to deal with gang activity. Police would be allowed
to prevent large crowds gathering and stop and search alleged
gang leaders without a warrant.
Henderson said fast-tracking the court hearings was part of
a plan to deal with violence at Wadeye. This sort of behaviour
is simply unacceptable and we are attacking it at its source,
he said. In reality, with the willing assistance of the
media, the Liberal and Labor governments have come together to
try and whitewash the sources of Wadeyes crisis, including
their own culpability, in order to pursue an increasingly vicious
social agenda.
See Also:
Australia: Aboriginal town
camp residents organise first-ever rally
[14 July 2006]
Australia: Riot squad called
to shut down Aboriginal community
[7 June 2006]
The crisis in Australia's
Aboriginal communities
How right-wing ideologues stand reality on its head
[25 May 2006]
Official response to Aboriginal
child sexual abuse in Australia: more law and order
[22 May 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |