|
WSWS
: News &
Analysis : Middle
East
Heavy losses feared amongst 1,400 passengers of sunken Egyptian
ferry
By Chris Marsden
4 February 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Dozens of bodies have been pulled from the water following
the sinking of an 35-year-old Egyptian ferry in the Red Sea. The
ship was carrying at least 1,310 passengers and 96 crew, according
to a spokesman for the ships owners, el-Salam Maritime Transport,
as well as five trucks and 22 cars.
Owners of the Panamanian-flagged ship reported late Friday
that 300 to 400 passengers had been rescued, but police authorities
could confirm only 241 people found alive. The official confirmed
death toll stood at 185.
Hundreds remained unaccounted for as night fell, raising fears
that the numbers of dead could be extremely high. Maritime sources
reported that rough seas and strong winds were impeding the work
of rescue crews. Survivors still in the water after dark would
go into shock as temperatures fall. The region is also known for
its strong currents.
The Al Salam Boccaccio 98 sank about 80 kilometres offshore
during an overnight journey from Dubai in Saudi Arabia to Safaga
in Egypt that should have lasted around five hours. Most people
using the route are Egyptians working in Saudi Arabia, their families
returning from their Eid holidays, street vendors or suppliers.
Some were returning from the hajj pilgrimage to the holy city
of Mecca. The passengers included about 1,200 Egyptians, as well
as 99 Saudis, 3 Syrians, 2 Sudanese and a Canadian, according
to one source.
The cause of the sinking is not known, but there were high
winds when the ship left Dubai, a sandstorm overnight on Saudi
Arabias west coast and thunderstorms earlier in the area
where the vessel was last seen on radar.
The head of administration at el-Salam Maritime Transport,
Adel Shukri, initially said he did not know of any SOS having
been sent. He said that the rescue operation had started just
after midnight, an hour to an hour and a half after the ship went
missing.
Four Egyptian frigates from the Coast Guard, a navy destroyer
and helicopters were looking for survivors before nightfall Friday,
but there were still high winds and rough seas. The US Navy Central
Command headquarters in Bahrain contacted the Egyptian government
offering help, and Egypt accepted. Egyptian authorities accepted
a US offer to divert a P3-Orion maritime naval patrol aircraft
to the area after initially declining. Britain announced that
it had sent the warship HMS Bulwark to help, but it would not
arrive for at least a day. Reports followed that it had been recalled,
with no explanation given. An Egyptian spokesman said there was
a vast area of water to search.
Saudi ships were patrolling waters off their shores, but found
no survivors or victims.
Despite official reassurances, there are mounting questions
regarding the ships safety and seaworthiness, not least
by relatives of possible victims. Relatives of the passengers
have complained of the information they received as they waited
for the ship to dock. How can they put all these passengers
in such an old ship that was not fit for sailing? asked
Ahmed Abdul Hamid, a teacher waiting news of his cousin.
A number of questions are raised as to what could have caused
the ship to sink and on the response of the authorities.
Most sources reject the possibility of a collision, as no one
reported an incident. But the area has a history of accidents.
In 1991 more than 500 people were killed when a ferry hit a coral
reef outside the same Egyptian port. The Al Salam Boccaccio 98
was involved in a collision in 1999. And the Al Salam 95, a sister
ship owned by the same company, sank in the Red Sea in October
after a collision with a Cypriot cargo vessel at the southern
entrance to the Suez Canal. There was a stampede among passengers
trying to escape during which two people were killed and 40 injured.
Then there is the more substantial question of the ships
safety.
The Al Salam 98 was built in 1970 in Italy and was close to
its full capacity of 1,487. Transport Minister Mohammed Lutfy
Mansour stressed that there had been no concerns about the seaworthiness
of the ship. The Saudi branch of the maritime insurance company
Lloyds also said the ship had met all safety requirements,
with all lifeboats and valid certificates.
Others have raised serious doubts.
David Osler, of Lloyds List, said that last June the
ship passed a structural survey test conducted by the International
Safety Management Code. But he told CNN that the Al Salam Boccaccio
98 was a roll-on roll-off ferrya design known to suffer
stability problems. One such vessel, The Herald of Free Enterprise,
sank at Zeebrugge, Belgium, in 1987, killing 193 passengers. The
Estonia, built in 1979, sank in 1994 en route to Stockholm, Sweden,
with the loss of 852 lives out of 1,000 passengers.
Osler explained, Once a small amount of water gets on
board it can set up an uncontrollable rocking that causes rapid
capsize.
While safety standards in the developed world had improved
markedly after Zeebrugge, he continued, This vessel was
pensioned off from Italy. It may have been overloaded.
Osler also told the Times, It would only take
a bit of water to get on board this ship and it would be all over....
The percentage of this type of ferry involved in this type of
disaster is huge.
Steve Todd, national secretary of the Rail, Maritime and Transport
Workers union in Britain, told the BBC, Certainly in British
waters, that type of ferry of that age would not be seen these
days.... Its very, very rare to be seen in most parts of
the world.
The ship also appears to have been modified in order to carry
extra passengers. Yvan Perchoc, a French-based shipping expert,
told Associated France Press that the Al Salam Boccaccio 98
is one of several old Italian ferries to which extra levels
were added in order to increase capacity.
Among the ships operating crossings in the Red Sea...some
are remarkable because of the height of their structures. They
are old Italian ferries to which four extra decks have been added,
raising the capacity from 500 to around 1,400.... Despite the
addition of extra bulges on the sides of these ships, one can
wonder about their stability.
Of possible significance is the fact that Farid al-Douadi,
the agent for the ship in Saudi Arabia, said that there were around
220 vehicles on board and that the ship had the capacity for 2,500
passengersboth figures well in excess of those cited by
company spokesmen in Egypt.
It is not known if the ship had enough lifejackets.
Then there is the delay in mounting the rescue operationaccording
to official sources, it did not begin for over an hour. Others
put the delay between the time the ship disappeared from the radar
and the launch of rescue vessels as longer. Controllers lost radar
contact with the ferry around two hours after it left Duba at
7 p.m. But no action was taken until after midnight in Egyptwhich
with the one-hour time difference leaves a gap of at least two
hours.
There are only sketchy reports about what finally motivated
a response. Egypts state news agency said that another ferry
in the area received a distress call from Al Salams captain,
who said his ship was in danger of sinking, but did not say how
the second ferry had reacted. Adel Shukri, head of administration
at the Cairo headquarters of el-Salam Maritime Transport, said
coastal stations did not receive an SOS message from the crew,
but said nothing about who had reported the sinking.
The rescue ships did not arrive until 10 hours after the ageing
ferry was believed to have sunk.
Egypts president, Hosni Mubarak, has ordered an immediate
inquiry, and a presidential spokesman raised questions about the
ships safety. He said that the speed at which the
ship sank and the fact there were not enough life rafts on board
confirm that there was a problem.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |