|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
Britain: Special Branch detain documentary actors and former
Guantánamo prisoners
By Paul Bond
27 February 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Two actors in a new documentary film on the US prison camp
at Guantánamo Bay and two former Guantánamo prisoners
were detained and interrogated by the Special Branch on February
16.
Ruhal Ahmed and Shafiq Rasul were part of the Tipton
Three (the other was Asif Iqbal), British citizens who were
held at the base in Cuba for more than two years before they were
released in March of 2004. They were never charged by their American
jailers with any crime. The young men were all from Tipton in
the West Midlands.
Ruhal Ahmed and Shafiq Rasul were returning from the Berlin
Film Festival with Rizwan Ahmed and Farhad Harun, two actors who
play them in a new documentary The Road to Guantánamo,
when they were stopped and questioned for more than an hour
at Londons Luton Airport.
The documentary by director Michael Winterbottom had won the
prestigious Silver Bear award at the festival.
The detention of the four men was a flagrant violation of democratic
rights, underscoring the extent to which Prime Minister Tony Blairs
anti-terror laws are leading in the direction of a police state.
The detaining officer told the actor Rizwan Ahmed that he and
the others had been stopped at immigration because anyone with
terror links had to be questioned. But the two ex-Guantánamo
prisoners have never been charged, let alone convicted, of any
terrorist-related crime, and must therefore be considered, as
a legal matter, to have no more terror links than
any other person entering the country.
The fact that the actors were also detained is especially chilling,
since their only terror link was being in the company
of the two former Guantánamo prisoners. This indicates
that, in the eyes of British immigration and police authorities,
anyone in any way associated with those illegally detained as
enemy combatants by the US are automatically suspect
and subject to detention and interrogationor worse.
Winterbottoms film shows how the three youths from Tipton
set off for Pakistan in September 2001 to attend Iqbals
wedding and subsequently volunteered for aid work in neighbouring
Afghanistan. When the US assault on Afghanistan began, the three
were captured by Northern Alliance soldiers, who handed them over
to American forces. They ended up at the Guantánamo prison
camp.
After they were released they gave interviews detailing their
torture and abuse at the hands of their American captors. Rasul
explained, for example, that he was not allowed out of his cell
for the first six weeks he was at the camp. He said, There
was a hook on the floor and leg irons attached to the hook, and
they put your hands between your ankles on the floor and chained
you to the hook on the floor as well. Theyd keep you there
for five hours, six hoursyou couldnt go to the toilet,
youd have to urinate, defecate where you are.
Clive Stafford Smith, legal director of the human rights organisation
Reprieve, denounced the detention of the four at Luton Airport.
He said the Special Branch was adding insult to injury by
harassing innocent men who suffered for two long years in Guantánamo
Bay before being released without charge. He added, As
if that were not enough, the Special Branch then detains the actors
who portray them in a film.
According to a press report, on the arrival of the four back
in Britain, Shafiq Rasul was stopped at the immigration desk.
Shortly afterwards, Rizwan Ahmed (who plays Rasul in the film)
was questioned by a Special Branch officer in the baggage claim
area. She took notes of his answers and made notations from his
passport. When the young actor asked why he was being questioned,
he was taken to an interview room.
The officer asked to examine the contents of Rizwan Ahmeds
wallet, whereupon the actor asked to speak to a lawyer. He was
told that he had no right to legal advice. The officer showed
him a blank form with the heading Section 7 of the Terrorism
Act Detention Form, which stated that a superintendent could
order a person to be detained for up to 48 hours without any outside
contact, not even with a lawyer.
The actor asked whether the officer was a superintendent, at
which point he was told he was not being held under this form
and would be denied access to a lawyer only for the first hour
of questioning.
When the officer left the room, Ahmed used his mobile phone
to call an academic lawyer friend, Ravinder Thukral. The latter
then spoke to the officer directly. It was not clear whether any
legal case was being made for refusing to allow Ahmed to make
calls, or whether he was simply not being assisted by those holding
him. Thukral contacted Reprieve, which has represented many of
the Guantánamo detainees.
Before Clive Stafford Smith of Reprieve could contact Ahmed,
the actor, under the threat of continued detention,
allowed the officer to go through his wallet. The officer noted
down details of his bank card as well as business cards he was
carrying.
The officer reportedly asked Ahmed whether he intended to make
more films, and if he had become an actor to make films to
publicise the struggles of Muslims. The actor was also asked
about his political views, including his attitude to the Iraq
war.
Ahmed said the officer then suggested he become an informant,
asking whether he would mind being contacted regularly by officers,
in case he overheard people discussing illegal activities.
At this point Stafford Smith contacted Ahmed on his mobile
telephone. Under instruction, the actor told the officer that
a solicitor from the office of human rights lawyer Gareth Peirce
(who had represented the Tipton Three) would call in a few minutes.
The officer replied that this would not be permitted, and called
in a male colleague who took Ahmeds telephone and proceeded
to examine the numbers stored in the phones memory.
A third officer then entered the room, and Ahmed was threatened
with being taken to a police station. Ahmed said that the officer
with his telephone called him a f**ker and, when he
objected, accused him of making things up. Ahmed demanded
he be allowed to call Gareth Peirces office.
The female officer granted this, but warned Ahmed that if he
asked about anything other than his right of legal access, the
telephone would be taken away from him. As soon as he got through
to the lawyers office, those holding him told him he was
free to go. The officer said he was prolonging his own detention
by insisting on talking to lawyers.
Ahmed was denied both the names of the interviewing officers
and copies of any notes from the interview. He was, however, handed
a search record sheet, which stated that the purpose of the detention
was intelligence. The second page of the record sheet,
under the heading Officers Must Also Complete, was
blank.
Afterwards, Ahmed described the incident as humiliating
and intimidating, and expressed concern that being
tagged as some kind of political activist could jeopardise
his employment prospects.
Clive Stafford Smith condemned Ahmeds detention as patently
illegal when it happened. He warned that under recent legislation
passed by the Blair government against glorifying
acts of terrorism, an actor involved in a production that put
an opposing side of the story to the official government line
could well face the threat of detention.
Whos next? he asked. Is Ken Stott going
to be detained because he played... Adolf Hitler?
The Road to Guantánamo will be shown on British
television on March 9.
See Also:
Britons release devastating
account of torture and abuse by US forces at Guantanamo
[6 August 2004]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |