|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
US media sheds crocodile tears for West Virginia miners
By Jerry Isaacs
10 January 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The US media coverage of the West Virginia mine disaster has
been a spectacle of ignorance, condescension and chasing higher
circulation. Unburdened with any serious knowledge of the lives
of coal miners or their history, scores of highly paid, highly
coiffed journalists from the cable and network news channels and
print media produced little but the most superficial explanations
of the tragedy and its background.
In the hundreds of hours of television news coverage and reams
of news articles, nothing could be found that enlightened the
worldwide audience following the gripping events as to the Sago
Mine disasters social and historical dimensions.
Indeed it generally takes such a tragedy for the US media to
discover there is a working class at all. This was all but acknowledged
by the editors of the New York Times, who commented, Just
as Hurricane Katrina forced Americans to look at the face of lingering
poverty and racism, this mining tragedy should focus us all on
another forgotten, mistreated corner of society.
Forgotten, mistreated by whom? If the social realities
of West Virginia or New Orleans have been kept out of public view
it is because the US media has done its best to conceal them.
The media has spent much of the last quarter century celebrating
wealth and power and doing everything possible to cover up the
social consequences of the pro-market and right-wing
policies of both big business parties. The manufacturers of public
opinion are well aware that mistreatment and oppression are not
limited to the corners of society but are a permanent
feature of life for tens of millions of working people throughout
America.
Prior to the mine explosion, where were the hard-hitting articles
examining the conditions of economic desperation in West Virginiaone
of the poorest states in Americaand the systematic dismantling
of federal safety standards and other pro-company measures that
have cost miners their lives and limbs? And it should come as
a surprise to no one that after a flurry of articles and CNN news
specials, the cameras will be packed up and the lives
of West Virginias miners and their families forgotten
again.
The focus of the privileged layers in the editorial offices
and news studios lies elsewhere. A cursory look at any edition
of the New York Times, for example, reveals their preoccupations
and concerns. Amid the countless ads for Rolex watches, luxury
cars and multi-million dollar real estate deals in Manhattan,
one finds life-style features about hiring your own personal shoppers
and image consultants and the $950 cocktail drink that is all
the rage among the young and affluent.
For the celebrity talking heads, like NBCs Matt Lauer
, a visit to a West Virginia mining community was like a voyage
to a distant planet. These people inhabit an entirely different
world than ordinary working people, particularly the miners of
West Virginia. Hence the media personalities recurring depiction
of the miners as a strange and exotic species on the verge of
extinction.
Any sincere concern for the plight of the miners and their
familiesand there is no reason to believe even that even
this affluent crowd was not moved by the tragedyfound expression
in a patronizing attitude that depicted the miners as simply oppressed
and downtrodden.
The news media can express sympathy for the masses as long
as they stay downtrodden. Just a month ago, the news media conducted
a vicious campaign to vilify the 34,000 New York City transit
workers who went on strike to defend their pensions and livelihoods.
The media spokesmen, who are feigning sympathy for the working
class today, echoed the foul attacks of billionaire mayor Michael
Bloomberg, who denounced the striking workers for being selfish,
greedy and indifferent to the plight of lower paid
workers.
Is there any doubt, however, that these same newscasters would
turn on a dime and denounce the miners and their families if they
dared to organize a strike of all mineworkers against the deadly
conditions in the industry? There has never been a major strike
in the coalfields, including the AT Massey and Pittston strikes
of the 1980s, in which the news media did not blackguard the miners
as unlawful, violent and deserving of the most severe penalties.
At the same time the media has deliberately played up the influence
of religion among the miners, widely publicizing each pronouncement
by a local preacher or relative that the miners fate is
ultimately in the hands of God. The aim is to present the miners
and their families as God-fearing, good Christians,
willing to turn their cheeks to whatever blows are delivered.
Without denying the influence of religionwhich has long
been utilized by the mine operators and the authorities to counter
the influence of socialism and the early efforts to unionize the
coalfieldsthe truth is the miners have never been identified
with deference before authority and resignation to their fate.
The resurgence of religious views today, including a certain element
of passivity, is a by-product of the betrayal and collapse of
the United Mine Workers union, which has left coal miners without
any mass organization to defend them, and the abandonment of social
reformism by the Democratic Party.
Nowhere in the news coverage would one get any inkling that
for nearly a century, beginning in the 1890s, the Appalachian
coalfields were the setting for some of the bloodiest class battles
in US historyand that the miners enjoyed the distinction
of being known as the most militant section of the American working
class. Just a short distance from the Sago Mine the towns of Monongah,
Farmington and Fairmont are forever etched in the history of the
miners struggles, including early efforts to organize politically
against the coal bosses and their two parties. In nearby Preston
County, for example, Socialist presidential candidate Eugene Debs
won 30 percent of the vote in 1912.
In its efforts to build ratings and get more advertising the
news media set out to provide a human interest story
when it began covering the Sago Mine disaster. Hoping to top this
with a happy ending, like the Somerset, Pennsylvania rescue in
2002, the cable stations and network journalists, relying on hearsay
and rumor rather than serious investigative reporting, contributed
to the disastrous misinformation that led the miners families
to believe the men had been found alive.
Since the tragic conclusion of the rescue attempt the news
media has instinctively reacted to the concerns of the coal companies
that the Sago Mine disaster might persuade younger workers to
avoid the occupation in the future, exacerbating the shortage
of skilled miners that is already plaguing the industry, just
as rising coal prices are making it more profitable than ever.
Over the past few days the media has suggested that the safety
violations at the Sago Mine were an aberration and that working
conditions in the mines have steadily improved. Along these lines
one CNN reporter urged the governors wife to explain how
she was encouraging family members and others to stay
in the business and tell them how important it is,
alongside the dangers, just to keep the economy going and surviving
as a very important industry in your state?
For its role in the Sago Mine disaster the news media has incurred
the disgust and anger of many miners and their families. One can
only say that this is entirely deserved.
See Also:
Mine safety cuts hindered West Virginia
rescue
[9 January 2006]
West Virginia towns mourn deaths of 12
coal miners
[6 January 2006]
West Virginia mine tragedy: Families
denounce company, state officials
[5 January 2006]
Twelve of 13 miners found dead after
false rescue report
[4 January 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |