|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
Britain: Drug trial leaves volunteers seriously ill
Scientist attacks lax regulatory regime
By Chris Talbot
29 March 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The drug trial conducted at Northwick Park Hospital, London,
that left six volunteers seriously ill has prompted a medical
researcher, Dr. Aubrey Blumsohn, to challenge the role of the
British governments drug watchdog, the Medical and Healthcare
Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
The six men were taking part in the initial, Phase One, trial
of TGN1412, a drug produced by a small German pharmaceutical research
company, TeGenero. Trials were contracted out to Parexel, a US-based
company that operates in a number of countries.
Immediately after taking the drug the men suffered acute adverse
reactions, described as massive inflammation, extreme pain and
vomiting, slipping in and out of a coma and the beginnings of
organ failure. They were immediately put into intensive care and
whilst four are reported to be improving, two are still on the
critical list two weeks later.
Drugs trials in Britain are supervised by the MHRA, which is
financed by the pharmaceutical industry. Investigation of what
went wrong in this drugs trial is also being carried out by the
MHRA.
Dr. Blumsohn told the WSWS: The question is, Who
watches the watchdog? Any proper investigation of this tragic
matter would seem almost by definition to involve the MHRA as
subject of further examination rather than as investigator.
The British government is so keen to encourage investment by
the drugs industry that it refused to accept the recommendations
of a report prepared last year by the House of Commons Parliamentary
Health Committee entitled The Influence of the Pharmaceutical
Industry. This report recommended that the MHRA should be
made independent of the pharmaceutical industry. Specific criticisms
raised in the report concerning drugs trials include: Limited
information given to trial participants and Exposure
of participants to unacceptable risks.
As well as the lax regulatory regime, the drug trial highlights
the way the British government is encouraging private involvement
in the state-run National Health Service (NHS). Northwick Park
is an NHS hospital but Parexel has a 36-bed unit within the hospital,
relying on emergency treatment provided by the NHS.
Parexel are allowed to advertise for volunteers for their trials,
stating that recruits will be paid for your time and inconvenience,
despite drug industry guidelines stating that payments should
not be mentioned in public notices. Press reports reveal that
volunteers took part primarily because of the £2,000 fee
they would receive for about two weeks spent in hospital.
Regarding the TGN1412 trial, Dr. Blumsohn said, Participants
in trials do knowingly subject themselves to risk for financial
gain or for altruistic reasons. What is not known is whether the
research design was appropriate, whether those risks were properly
evaluated, whether the degree of risk was conveyed honestly to
participants, and who is responsible for this. The MHRA would
have been in large part responsible for considering the strength
of evidence underlying both the appropriateness of human trials
and the trial design. Simultaneous study of six individuals in
the first human trial of a drug would seem to constitute poor
study design under any circumstances.
Dr. Blumsohn pointed to comments made in the Sunday Times
about the drugs trial. TGN1412 is not a traditional chemical product
but a monoclonal antibody, a protein that is genetically
engineered to target cells in the bodys immune system. Most
monoclonal antibody drugs are designed to suppress the immune
systems reaction. There are now several such drugs on the
market, including Herceptin, the breast cancer drug.
TGN1412 is unusual in being designed to stimulate production
of so-called T-cells that regulate other cells in the immune system.
According to experts the danger is that rather than stimulate
the regulators it is possible to overstimulate the entire immune
system, which is what seems to have happened in this case.
Professor Angus Dalgleish, a cancer specialist at London University
and world expert on the immune system, told the Sunday Times,
I would have told the people doing this trial not to do
it because the dangers were so great. Citing earlier studies
on similar drugs that had caused severe side effects, he said
of the researchers, They should have known they would get
a meltdown because this drug was hitting exactly the same immune
response pathways.
A similar comment was made by Jorg Schaaber, a member of the
German drug industry monitoring group Buko Pharma (referred to
in the novel The Constant Gardener by John Le Carré).
Schaaber said that all trials of monoclonal antibodies had shown
the drugs carried considerable risks of side effects
and that anyone getting involved in these studies should
be made aware of that.
Dr. Blumsohn has a particular concern over how the pharmaceutical
industry conducts its research. Universities in the main are now
reliant on grants from the industry for their investigations,
and he was suspended from Sheffield University last year after
challenging Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals for not giving
him access to statistical data on research that he had carried
out on osteoporosis drugs.
He commented on the MHRA in the present case: They are
investigating themselves. It is all completely implausible and
the whole regulatory system is a house of cards that is about
to fall over.
See Also:
British scientist challenges
pharmaceutical company over research paper
[28 January 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |