|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Democrats ensure confirmation of NSA spy chief to head CIA
By Joe Kay
25 May 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The US Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday gave its support
to General Michael Hayden, the principle architect of recently
exposed domestic spying programs, to head the Central Intelligence
Agency.
Leading Democrats joined Republicans in approving Hayden, the
former head of the National Security Agency (NSA) and the current
principal deputy director of national intelligence. Hayden is
expected to easily win confirmation by the full Senate before
the end of the week.
Four Democrats and all eight Republicans on the committee voted
to recommend Haydens confirmation by the full Senate, while
three Democrats voted against. The four Democrats who voted for
Hayden are among the most senior Democrats in the Senate: the
ranking Democrat and vice chairman of the committee, Jay Rockefeller
(West Virginia); Carl Levin of Michigan, the second-ranking Democrat
on the committee; Dianne Feinstein of California; and Barbara
Mikulski of Maryland.
By ensuring a wide margin on the Senate committee to confirm
Hayden, the Democrats have once again given their imprimatur to
the Bush administrations unprecedented attacks on democratic
rights.
The vote came less than two weeks after a USA Today report
that the NSA, under a program initiated by Hayden, has been secretly
tracking the telephone calls of over 200 million Americans since
shortly after 9/11. Without the benefit of court warrants, and
in flagrant violation of federal statutes as well as constitutional
safeguards against such government invasions of privacy, the agency
has been amassing a vast database of telephone records turned
over to it by the largest US telecommunications companies.
That revelation, in turn, was preceded by a December, 2005
New York Times exposé concerning another NSA program,
also initiated under Hayden, to secretly eavesdrop on phone calls
of US citizens without a warrant. Both programs, which remained
hidden from the American people for years, constitute an unprecedented
step in the direction of an American police state.
The information banks on millions of Americans are aimed not
at fighting terrorism, but at laying the groundwork for political
repression on a mass scale. These measures are being implemented
by a ruling elite that sees the greatest threat to its wealth
and power coming not from bands of Islamic terrorists, but from
among the American people. Under conditions of deepening social
and economic crisis, with the gap between the financial elite
and the broad mass of people continually widening, the intelligence
and police apparatus wants to know what individuals are thinking,
and with whom they are associating.
Haydens central role in this anti-democratic conspiracy
proved no obstacle to his approval by the Senate to head the CIA.
Nor did the fact that both he and President Bush, in public statements
made after last Decembers exposure of the NSAs warrentless
eavesdropping on communications between the US and other countries,
gave false assurances that the NSAs domestic spying was
carefully targeted and strictly limited to suspected terrorists.
Last weeks Senate Intelligence Committee confirmation
hearing on the generals nomination was a stage-managed exercise
in cowardice and duplicity. The entire process lasted a day, with
an open session of few hours followed by a closed-door meeting
of Hayden with the committee members.
In the open session, Hayden refused to reveal any concrete
information about the domestic spying operations over which he
presided, on the grounds that the programs were classified and
any public discussion of them would jeopardize national security
and the so-called war against terrorism. The committee
chair, Senator Pat Roberts, Republican of Kansas, used his opening
remarks to deliver a McCarthyite attack on journalists and newspapers
that informed the public about the existence of the secret programs,
and on politicians who raised objections or called for investigations
into the illegal operations.
None of the Democrats on the committee challenged Roberts
demagogic attack, which was echoed by Hayden in his own opening
statement. They either praised the general outright or couched
half-hearted criticisms of his methods within affirmations of
support for the war on terrorism and the need to strengthen
the governments spy agencies.
Hayden refused as well to answer questions on the CIAs
use of torture, renditions and secret detention facilities.
The results of the hearing were a foregone conclusion. Several
of the principle Democrats had been present at briefings on the
domestic spying programs given to selected members of the Senate
and the House of Representatives by the Bush administration, and
were therefore complicit in their implementation. Among the lawmakers
who attended at least one of these briefings were Rockefeller,
Feinstein and Levin, all of whom voted to confirm Hayden.
Following the vote, Levin declared absurdly that Hayden would
stand up to the president or anybody else whos trying
to get him to reach a certain conclusion on intelligence, and
speak truth to power. He added that Hayden had some
backbone and willingness to say no to power.
During the hearing, in an exchange that could very well have
been pre-arranged, Levin asked the general whether he had had
some disagreements with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld over
the balance of power between the different intelligence agencies.
Hayden confirmed that he had, and this was seized on by Levin
and other senators as a sign of Haydens independence.
Dianne Feinstein showered praise on Hayden, describing him
as the leader and honest broker the CIA needs to regain
its footing as the worlds premier spy service.
The vote on Hayden is yet another sign that the Democratic
Party will seek to prevent opposition to the attacks on democratic
rights from becoming an issue in the 2006 and 2008 elections,
just as it is seeking suppress popular opposition to the war in
Iraq.
Even those Democrats who voted against the nomination issued
statements emphasizing their support for fighting the terrorists
aggressively, bolstering the central pretext used by the
Bush administration to justify both the war and the assault on
democratic rights.
The easy confirmation of Hayden is a signal from Congress that
no serious investigation will be carried out into what is the
most massive violation of privacy rights in the history of the
United States. The Bush administration has refused to provide
details of the programs, and investigations announced by the Justice
Department and the Federal Communications Commission have been
quickly called off on the grounds that the NSA program is classified.
The breakdown of American democracy is a product of the profound
crisis of American capitalism, the vast growth of social inequality,
and the determination of the American ruling elite to maintain
its position through war abroad and ever greater attacks on the
working population at home.
The confirmation of Hayden with crucial support from the Democrats
underscores a fundamental lesson of more than a decade of anti-democratic
conspiraciesfrom the impeachment of Clinton, to the theft
of the 2000 election, to the launching of a war based on lies:
Neither of the two parties and no section of the ruling elite
has a serious commitment to the defense of democratic rights.
These rights can be defended only by the working class, and
only through the building of its own mass, independent, socialist
party.
See Also:
Senate hearing on CIA nominee: Democrats
rubberstamp Bush police-state spying
[19 May 2006]
Framework for a police state: US government
phone spying targets all Americans
[12 May 2006]
Bush defends illegal
spying on Americans: the specter of presidential dictatorship
[19 December 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |