|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
Left prop for Prodi
Italy: Bertinotti voted speaker in the Italian parliament
By Peter Schwarz
6 May 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Communist Refoundation (Rifondazione Comunista) chairman
Fausto Bertinottis election as speaker in the lower house
of parliamentthe third-highest post in Italian public lifemarks
this organizations complete integration into the ruling
political establishment.
Bertinotti, 66, was elected last Saturday in a fourth-round
ballot with 337 votes. The first three ballots required a two-thirds
majority, while in the fourth a simple majority was sufficient.
Nearly all the deputies of the Union alliance (Unione)
voted in favor of Bertinotti. The Union is a broad spectrum of
parties extending from a wing of the Christian Democrats to various
other bourgeois groupings, and includes the Left Democrats and
Communist Refoundation.
Originally the former prime minister and prominent Left Democrat,
Massimo DAlema, had shown interest in the office. However
the future head of government Romano Prodi convinced him to cede
to Bertinotti.
As speaker of the Chamber of Deputies, Bertinotti occupies
a crucial post with the job of securing stable majorities for
a Prodi government. Traditionally the post has been regarded as
non-partisan. The speaker is responsible for regulating parliamentary
schedule rather than legislative content. However under present
political conditionswith Prodi holding an extremely slim
majority, an unstable government coalition comprising ten different
parties, and an aggressive oppositionBertinotti will have
the task of ensuring that parliament does not sabotage the new
government.
There is another is likely reason for Prodis decision.
By entrusting Bertinotti with the prestigious speakers post,
he is securing the loyalty of a man who forced his resignation
as prime minister in 1998. At that time, Communist Refoundation
brought down the first government led by Prodi, after supporting
it in parliament for three years.
For years sections, of the so-called radical left in Europe
have praised Communist Refoundation as a role model for
the type of politics they advocate: the unification of former
Social Democrats, Stalinists, radicals and trade unionists in
a new left wing party. Bertinottis appearances
at various European and World Social Forums were cheered and his
party was celebrated as a successful example of how to link parliamentary
work with social movements. Communist Refoundation was
considered living proof of the guiding principle of the anti-globalization
movement: Another politics is possible.
The organization emerged in 1991 following the break up of
the Italian Communist Party. Bertinotti, who had begun his political
career in the Socialist Party led by Bettino Craxi, switched to
the Communist Party in 1967 and later made a career as a trade
union leader. At the start of the 1990s, he rejected the transformation
of the ICP into an overtly social democratic party and created
Communist Refoundation, in which numerous former Stalinists
found a new home.
In the years that followed, Communist Refoundation absorbed
numerous radical groupings that had originally developed in opposition
to the Stalinist ICP. One of these organizations was the Italian
section of the United Secretariat (its French section is the Liege
Communiste RévolutionnaireLCR), which dissolved itself
into Communist Refoundation. Its most prominent leader,
Livio Maitan, served as one of Bertinottis closest advisors
before dying in 2004.
In the nineties, Communist Refoundation helped prop
up two technocratic governments led by the Bank of Italy chief
Lamberto Dini and Carlo Azeglio Ciampi, as well as the first government
led by Prodi. At that time, however, it posed as a defender of
the extra-parliamentary movements. Now, in addition to taking
the post of parliamentary speaker, the party is expected to get
two ministers in the new government, assuming a central political
responsibility for the defense of the bourgeois order under conditions
of profound crisis.
The parliamentary election at the beginning of April revealed
the depth of Italys political crisis. Although Prodis
electoral alliance was supported by the entire left as well as
broad layers of the Italian and European bourgeoisie, its victory
was wafer thin. The reason for the poor showing lies above all
in Prodis political program, which richly deserves the label
neo-liberal.
The former Christian Democrat, an industrial manager and economics
professor, ran on a program that centered on balancing the national
budget and relieving businesses of the burden of paying social
security contributions. In the nineties, Prodi had already slashed
social expenditures in order to make Italy fit for the introduction
of the euro. As president of the European Commission, he was later
responsible for a number of measures, including the Lisbon agenda,
designed to make Europe the most competitive and dynamic
marketing area in the world by 2010.
Prodis hostility to the interests of ordinary workers
made it possible for then Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, aided
by of his control of the media, to manipulate the fears of oppressed
social layers. It also helped him win support from sections of
the middle class in the relatively wealthy north of Italy, whose
export-oriented industry is dominated by middle sized and small
companies.
The election of speakers for the two houses of parliament last
Saturday was considered the first real test of Prodis fragile
majority. Until then, Berlusconi had refused to accept his defeat
at the polls and submit his resignation. He finally did this on
Tuesday, after Prodis candidates had been accepted in both
chambers.
In the lower house, the vote was relatively free of problems,
because Prodis alliance has a clear majority of seats, despite
his slim election majority. However it was a different story in
the Senate, where Prodi only has a two-seat advantage. Here, for
better or worse, he is dependent on Communist Refoundation,
which has a total of 27 senators.
The Berlusconi camp had proposed 87-year-old Giulio Andreotti,
a lifetime senator, as candidate for the speaker of the Senate.
The aged politician personifies the methods of conspiracy, corruption
and illegal wheeling and dealing that have dominated Italian political
life for decades. The Christian Democrat Andreotti has been involved
in 33 of Italys 59 postwar governments, and in seven governments
he was prime minister. He maintained close links to the Vatican
and the Mafia and was considered a master of intrigue. Twenty-nine
separate attempts were made to lift his parliamentary immunity,
and only the last was successful. In 2002, he was condemned to
24 years prison for involvement in the murder of a journalist.
An appeals court overturned the conviction, however, sparing him
from spending the rest of his life behind bars.
The Prodi camp reacted to Andreottis candidacy as it
always does to such provocations: it adapted to the right wing
and put forward 73-year-old Franco Marini as its candidate. Like
Andreotti, he is a former Christian Democrat who served in 1991
as Labor Minister in Andreottis last government.
Although the two candidates are friends and politically indistinguishable,
the voting was characterized by bouts of tumult. The results of
the second vote, which Marini won, were annulled, after it turned
out that his first name had been spelled incorrectly on two ballots.
Marini finally won the three necessary extra votes in the fourth
ballot.
On May 8, the parliament reassembles to elect a new president.
The candidates are not certain at this point. Following initial
interest by Berlusconi in Italys highest public office,
he is now proposing 85-year-old Carlo Azeglio Ciampi for another
term. Ciampi, a financier and former central bank president, would
probably be acceptable to Prodi.
The violent conflicts between parties that essentially represent
the same pro-business and anti-worker program, together with the
allocation of the highest public offices to men who should have
long since accepted their pensions, are an expression of the utter
isolation of the entire political elite from the mass of the population.
Neither the Berlusconi campcomprising an alliance of the
most rapacious elements of the Italian bourgeoisie with neo-fascists
and open racists, nor the Prodi camp, made up of more traditional
and pro-European layers of the bourgeoisie backed by the apparatuses
of the former worker organizationshave a program capable
of meeting in any sense whatsoever the needs of the broad population.
There is not the least doubt regarding the character of the
Prodi government. Those business associations that supported Prodi
in the election campaign are now demanding a rapid implementation
of the social and welfare cuts which Berlusconi was unable to
impose. In this situation Communist Refoundation has taken
on the crucial role of shielding the government from mass
discontent.
The integration of Communist Refoundation into the bourgeois
camp cannot be explained simply on the basis of the personal characteristics
of its leader Bertinotti, who is well known for his plush life-style
and his handling of the media and business bosses. It is rather
the inevitable result of a perspective that rejects the building
of an independent political party of the working class and instead
orients to the decaying and discredited old political apparatuses.
It graphically highlights the results of a course that is also
being followed elsewhere in Europe, by the Left Party in Germany,
for example, as well as the United Left in France.
See Also:
Center-left alliance wins
Italian election by razor-thin majority
[12 April 2006]
Parliamentary elections in
Italy
Mudslinging obscures lack of alternative
[7 April 2006]
Italian election campaign
begins with anti-Berlusconi opposition backing austerity candidate
[23 February 2006]
Italy: Berlusconi
changes electoral law to remain in power
[4 November 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |