|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
US Marines to stand trial for massacre of Iraqi civilians
in Haditha
By Tom Carter
29 May 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
US Marines involved in a massacre of Iraqi civilians in Haditha
last November will stand trial for murder and dereliction of duty.
Twelve soldiers have been returned to Camp Pendleton to await
charges in a military trial, and are forbidden to speak to the
press.
As yet, no soldiers have been officially named or charged,
but comments to the press by senior US military officials indicate
that murder charges will soon be brought against three Marines,
and dereliction of duty charges, for covering up the crime, will
be brought against the others. Critical evidence against the Marines
includes photographs taken by military intelligence officials
immediately following the murders.
More than four months after the incident, and after numerous
official statements lying about what occurred, the Pentagon has
officially acknowledged that the massacre took place. Officials
briefed selected members of Congress last week. John Warner, chairman
of the Senate Armed Services Committee, following a briefing,
told reporters, There are established facts that incidents
of a very serious nature did take place.
The legal proceedings could eventually find the lowest-ranking
perpetrators guilty of murder, but as with previous US atrocities
that have come to light in Iraq and Afghanistan, such as Abu Ghraib,
the Bush administration and its loyal opposition in
the Democratic Party will seek to ensure that none of the high-ranking
military and civilian officials who plotted the wars, ordered
the killing of tens of thousands in bombing raids, and sanctioned
the use of torture are brought to justice.
The Pentagon began to back away from its previous whitewash
of the killings in Haditha only after Time magazine reporters
in January presented it with photographs they had acquired of
the carnage as well as interviews with local residents who witnessed
the slaughter.
Since then, a clearer picture has emerged of the events, which
in their premeditated and homicidal character recall the infamous
massacre carried out in March of 1968 by US soldiers against Vietnamese
civilians in the village of My Lai.
At 7:15 a.m. on Saturday, November 19, 2005, a convoy of US
Marines from Kilo Company, 3rd Batallion, 1st Marines was hit
by a remote-controlled roadside bomb affixed to a propane tank.
The driver of one Humvee, Lance-Corporal Miguel Terrazas, was
killed instantly, while two other Marines in the vehicle were
wounded.
After Marines confirmed that the bomb was detonated by remote
control, a drone surveillance aircraft was launched, and Marines
prepared to conduct house-to-house searches. The Los Angeles
Times has reported that at this point, jets dropped
500-pound bombs, but is unclear where the bombs fell, why
the bombs were dropped, and with what results.
The dozen Marines involved in the house-to-house searches split
into four-man fire teams. One of these fire teams,
led by a sergeant identified by ABC News as Frank Wuterich, began
methodically killing innocent civilians over the course of the
next five hours.
Five people in a nearby taxi were shot to death immediately,
and then the fire team raided three houses. In each house, the
Marines broke down the door, grouped the occupants together in
a single room, and executed them. The victims included old women,
children, men, and infants.
So many bullets were fired at close range that most of the
head of one man was obliterated; another woman had both arms shorn
off at the elbow. Almost all of the victims were shot point blank
in the upper body, execution style. One man was then gunned down
as he attempted to flee.
In all, 18 people were killed in the houses, one outside, and
five in the taxi, bringing the total to 24.
Nine-year-old Eman Waleed and her younger brother Abdul Rahman
survived the attack on their house, as all of the adults in the
room shielded the children with their bodies. Hours after the
massacre, Iraqi soldiers found the children under the pile of
corpseswounded but alive.
Eman has been quoted recalling the Marines shouting, breaking
down doors, and murdering her terrified grandparents as they emerged
in their nightclothes. Then, as the Marines turned to her, her
parents and relatives leapt to shield her from the bullets. As
her parents lay dying on top of her, and even though she had been
shot herself, she knew to keep quiet. Abdul, one year younger,
has been unable to communicate since November.
Following the massacre, the officer in charge reported to his
superiors that his unit had been hit by a roadside bomb and had
then come under attack by insurgents with small-arms from the
nearby houses. Not long after the attack, a separate military
intelligence unit arrived on the scene and photographed the bodiesa
routine military procedure following any engagement. The cover-up
began here.
It is likely that the Marines involved in the incident knew
that they had not been attacked by insurgents. If nothing else,
the Kalashnikov rifles commonly used by insurgents make a distinctive
krak-krak sound, and US soldiers learn quickly to distinguish
this report from the sounds of other rifles.
The intelligence unit that arrived later to photograph the
bodies would have noticed the execution-style wounds, the absence
of weapons or shell casings inside the houses, and the lack of
bullet holes on the houses exteriors.
The units photographs and a report were filed with a
military officialmost likely a battalion intelligence officerwho
would have noticed the discrepancy between the official account
and the photographs. Finally, the unmanned surveillance aircraft
that was launched after the initial roadside bombing would have
recorded from the air the entire battle, or lack thereof, and
this footage would have been seen by officials high up in the
chain of command.
Nonetheless, an official Marine communiqué from Camp
Blue Diamond in Ramadi on November 20 claimed that a US
Marine and 15 Iraqi civilians were killed yesterday from the blast
of a roadside bomb.... [I]mmediately following the bombing, gunmen
attacked the convoy with small-arms fire.
Lieutenant-Colonel Michelle Martin-Hing is among the military
officials who evidently lied about the events of November 19.
She claimed that the fault for the civilian deaths lay with insurgents
who placed noncombatants in the line of fire as the Marines
responded to defend themselves.
After the Marines had left the area, a local Haditha journalism
student with a video camera arrived and recorded grisly images
in the houses, on the streets, and at the hospital morgue. In
January, reporters for Time magazine acquired these images,
as well as interviews with witnesses, and presented them to Colonel
Barry Johnson, a US Military spokesman, for comment. Following
this exchange, an official military investigation was launched,
and the families of those who were murdered were each paid $2,500.
On March 19, Time ran its report, called One Morning
in Haditha: US Marines killed 15 Iraqi civilians in their homes
last November. Was it self-defense, an accident, or cold-blooded
revenge? Earlier this month, Congressman John Murtha (Democrat
of Pennsylvania), who had been briefed on the events, publicly
charged that the civilians had been killed in cold blood.
I understand the investigation shows that in fact there
was no firefight, he said, there was no explosion
that killed the civilians on a bus. There was no shrapnel. There
were only bullet holes inside the house where the Marines had
gone in.
In the past week, another murder and cover-up perpetrated by
US Marines in Iraq has come to light. Military officials have
charged that in Hamandiya, on April 26, US troops murdered a defenseless
man and then planted a Kalashnikov and shovel on his body in an
attempt to frame him as an insurgent. The alleged perpetrators
have been returned to Camp Pendleton, and a military trial in
their case is being prepared.
The men who were directly involved in these killings should
stand trial for what they have done, but it is absurd to claim
that their prosecution and punishment constitutes justice
and absolves the political and military leaders who sent them
to Iraq on the basis of lies and conditioned them to carry out
atrocities in support of an illegal invasion and colonial-style
occupation.
All crimes and atrocities in an aggressive war flow from the
decision to wage war in the first place, and in a war of colonial
occupation and mass oppression, atrocities such as the massacre
of November 19 are inevitable. This was the legal principle established
at Nuremberg and invoked against senior Nazi military and government
officials who planned and carried out military aggression.
Those who are ultimately responsible for the events of November
19 are the architects of the Iraq war itselfmembers of the
Bush administration, beginning with the president, leaders of
both houses of Congress, and the top military brass. They continue
to wage war in the face of determined popular resistance in Iraq
to foreign occupation and massive anti-war sentiment in the US.
After Abu Grahib, Fallujah, Haditha and a death toll of more than
a hundred thousand Iraqis and nearly 2,500 Americans, no high-ranking
official has been held accountable.
For these same officials to lay their own crimes at the feet
of the lowest-ranking perpetrators is utter hypocrisy. It is worth
pointing out that Saddam Hussein is presently being tried for
crimes carried out during his presidency, for which he is being
held responsible whether or not it can be proved that he was directly
responsible. The US-orchestrated prosecution is arguing that the
crimes flowed from his policies, and that he therefore bears guilt.
See Also:
Witnesses, video document massacre in
Haditha: US Marines killed Iraqi civilians in cold blood
[20 May 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |