|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
US media, Democrats deflect opposition to government spying
on Americans
By Barry Grey
13 May 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
One day after the revelation that the National Security Agency
has been secretly compiling a data base of the telephone calls
of some 200 million Americans, the response from the media and
both Democratic and Republican politicians already makes clear
that there will be no serious opposition from within the political
establishment to this further step in the direction of a police
state.
On Friday, as General Michael Hayden, who presided over the
NSA spying program as head of the agency from 1999 to 2005, made
the rounds of Senate offices in advance of next weeks confirmation
hearings on his nomination to head the CIA, Senate Minority Leader
Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, praised him as a good man
and declared, I have no problems with General Hayden going
into the hearing.
Reid, along with other top Democrats in Congress, was well
aware of the NSAs domestic spying program, having been briefed
along with leading Republicans by the Bush administration.
As for the media, it did not take long after USA Today published
its May 11 exposé on the spying operation for the networks
and press to begin their efforts to confuse and disorient the
American people and condition them to accept this unprecedented
attack on democratic rights.
The Washington Post led the way, publishing as the lead
article on its web site early Friday the results of an overnight
poll conducted jointly by the Post and ABC News. The survey
purported to show that 63 percent of Americans supported the NSA
domestic spying operation that was authorized by President Bush
shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Under the program, the three largest US telecommunications
companiesAT&T, Verizon and BellSouthare handing
over to the NSA the records of every telephone call made by every
one of their customers, including the date, the duration of the
call and the phone number dialed. This is being done without securing
court warrants and without Congressional oversight, in flagrant
violation of both the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution
and federal statutes.
The existence of the program exposes as lies previous statements
made by Bush and Hayden, following last Decembers exposure
of a secret NSA program to intercept and monitor international
telephone calls and emails. At that time, Bush and Hayden said
that the NSA was targeting only communications from or to countries
outside the US and strictly limiting the spying to communications
involving known terrorist suspects.
Beneath the headline Poll: Most Americans Support NSAs
Efforts, the Post said its poll also showed that
65 percent of those interviewed said it was more
important to investigate potential terrorist threats even
if it intrudes on privacy. An even larger majority,
66 percent, said, according to the newspaper, they would not
be bothered if NSA collected records of personal calls they had
made.
The Friday evening ABC News program featured the poll and presented
it as definitive proof that a large majority of Americans supported
the domestic spying. ABC News commentator, George Stephanopoulos,
a former top political aide to Democratic President Bill Clinton,
said the poll would convince Democrats to tone down their criticisms
of both the NSA and Hayden.
Hayden was named Monday by Bush to succeed Porter J. Goss as
head of the CIA. Stephanopoulos, echoing most other TV pundits,
predicted that Hayden would be confirmed by the Senate.
NBC Nightly News also led its Friday broadcast with the Washington
Post-ABC News survey.
Both the Washington Post-ABC News poll and the uses
to which it is being put are manipulative and cynical. It is,
on its face, absurd to attribute any serious significance to a
poll taken on the very day of the NSA programs exposure.
The general population could not possibly have adequate time or
information to assess the implications of such an unprecedented
invasion of privacy rights, all the more so given the deliberate
efforts of the mass media to play down its seriousness and conceal
from the public the full scope of the spying operation.
There is, moreover, a thoroughly worked out and well tested
modus operandi for conducting polls in such a way as to slant
the result in a desired direction. The manner in which questions
are posed, the order in which they are presented, the size and
demographics of the polling sample, and the overall framework
within which the questions are asked all play a major role in
the ultimate result.
All of these issues come into play in the Washington Post-ABC
News poll. In its report on the poll, the Post said it
was conducted by telephone May 11 among a mere 502 randomly
selected adults. The newspaper felt obliged to issue its
own caveat, writing: The practical difficulties of doing
a survey in a single evening represent other sources of error
in this or any other overnight poll.
Why then, rush into print and broadcast the poll on the evening
news as though it were authoritative?
All of the questions, as listed in the Posts report
on its poll, take uncritically as their premise the governments
claim that the domestic spying operation is being conducted in
order to protect the American people against potential terrorist
attacksa claim that is without any merit and is contradicted
by the vast scope of the private information on ordinary Americans
that is being collected.
One typically loaded question reads: What do you think
is more important nowfor the federal government to investigate
possible terrorist threats, even if it intrudes on personal privacy;
or for the federal government not to intrude on personal privacy,
even if that limits its ability to investigate possible terrorist
threats?
Even if one were to accept as valid the results of the poll,
they would only underscore the pernicious role played by the media
in systematically misinforming the American people, concealing
the vast implications of the governments police state measures,
and working to deaden and subvert the democratic sensibilities
of the population.
In any event, the Washington Post-ABC News poll is wildly
at odds with other recent polls on the Bush administrations
attacks on democratic rights. On the same day as the Post published
its snap poll, USA Today cited a December 2005 poll showing
that Americans by more than two to one65%-31%said
the government shouldnt take steps against terrorism that
violate basic civil liberties.
The underlying political motivations behind the Washington
Post-ABC News poll were reflected in the editorial comments
of both the Post and the New York Times. Both newspapers
criticized the NSA program as an invasion of privacy, the Times
noting: By cross-referencing phone numbers with databases
that link numbers to names and addresses, the government could
compile dossiers of what people and organizations each American
is in contact with, and the Post calling it a massive
intrusion on personal privacy.
But both newspapers carefully avoided any call for the program
to be halted, for any measures to be taken against Bush or other
administration officials, or for General Hayden to be rejected
by the Senate as the new CIA head. As the Times put it
in its inimitable two-faced way: The confirmation hearings
of Michael Hayden, President Bushs nominee for Central Intelligence
Agency director, are also a natural forum for a serious, thorough
and pointed review of exactly what has been going on.
In the end, both newspapers called for the White House and
Congress to collaborate in revising existing intelligence laws
to vastly expand the legal powers of the government to spy on
its citizens.
See Also:
Framework for a police state
US government phone spying targets all Americans
[12 May 2006]
US government continues to escalate domestic
spying
[5 May 2006]
Lawsuit details AT&T cooperation
in illegal government spying on Americans
[18 April 2006]
Bush approved security leak
to smear Iraq war critic
[8 April 2006]
More revelations of illegal
spying by US government
[7 January 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |