|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Sri
Lanka
Local election results in Sri Lanka reflect widespread fears
of war
By Sarath Kumara
29 May 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The outcome of the final round of voting in Sri Lankas
local elections on May 20 proved a blow to the ruling United Peoples
Freedom Alliances (UPFA), despite a major campaign to secure
a decisive win. Of the 20 local councils at stake, the UPFA was
able to win only five and, moreover, failed to win the prestigious
Colombo municipal council.
Most local councils were elected on March 30. However, polls
were postponed in 18 areas, including Colombo, due to legal wrangling
and another two in the eastern Batticaloa district for security
reasons. Polls for two councils in the northern Wanni area, controlled
by the Liberations Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), have been postponed
indefinitely.
During the first round of voting, the UPFA won a significant
majority223 of the 266 councils at stake. The voting took
place in the wake of renewed peace talks in February between the
government and the LTTE, lending some credibility to President
Mahinda Rajapakses claims to be pursuing peace. The UPFA
also used its hold on power nationally to promise handouts to
supportive councils.
The recent election, however, was held under the shadow of
war. A series of blatant provocations, in all likelihood carried
out by pro-government paramilitaries, inflamed tensions and led
to an escalating round of violence. Prominent pro-LTTE politician
V. Vigneswaran was gunned down in Trincomalee on April 7. Plans
for a second round of peace talks fell apart and on April 25 open
clashes erupted after a suicide bombing on army headquarters in
Colombo nearly claimed the life of army chief Lieutenant General
Sarath Fonseka.
The low turnout and shift against the UPFA in the May 20 local
elections reflects widespread fear over a return to war, as well
as anger at the sharply rising cost of living. The disaffection
was not simply with the UPFA, but the main opposition parties
as well. The United National Party (UNP), which has previously
paraded as a champion of peace talks, is rapidly falling into
line with the governments aggressive stance.
The voter participation rate dropped for most councils to between
55 and 62 percent. The figure for the Colombo Municipal Council
was one of the lowest at just 54.29 percent. These compare with
a national average of 75 percent for the presidential election
last November and 65 percent in the first round of local elections
in March.
Only in the war ravaged eastern province was the turnout significantly
higher. But there the voters turned their back on the major parties
and supported communal parties and independents. The Sri Lanka
Muslim Congress (SLMC) won six of the eight eastern local councils,
by appealing for a return to the peace process and aid for survivors
of the December 2004 tsunami disaster. The pro-LTTE Tamil National
Alliance (TNA), campaigning as Ilankai Thamil Arasu Katchchi (ITAK),
won control of the Naveenthanveli council.
The main focus of attention was on the capital Colombo, where
the municipal council has historically played a significant role
in the countrys political affairs. A total of 12 parties
and independent groups contested the poll. The UPFA was decisively
defeated by a previously unknown independent group backed by the
UNP. The group gained 82,580 votes compared to just 57,158 for
the UPFA.
Rajapakse had high hopes of winning Colombo. He wanted not
only to end the UNPs control but also to demonstrate his
capacity to win votes across communal lines from each of the substantial
groups of Sinhala, Tamil and Muslims voters in the capital.
Rajapakse chose long-time radical opportunist Vasudeva Nanayakkara,
as the mayoral candidate to lead the UPFA list. Nanayakkara, who
heads the Democratic Left Front (DLF), is a backer of the so-called
peace process promoted by the major powers and business. Rajapakse
had hoped to capitalise on antiwar sentiment, as well as anger
over the citys decaying infrastructure, evident in the collapse
of garbage collection services. Rajapakse and Nanayakkara promised
to convert Colombo into a modern city within a few years.
Nanayakkaras chances were further boosted by the decision
of the election commissioner to reject the UNP list on technical
grounds. None of this helped the UPFA, however, whose vote slumped.
It won only 14 seats, compared to 23 secured by the UNP-backed
independent group.
The following day, Nanayakkara admitted on Sirasa TV:
We were unable to get more votes from Tamils and Muslims
and we were unable to increase [our] votes from Sinhalese. It
was due to fear over the restarting of the war and also due to
the burden of the cost of living.
According to the Daily Mirror, Rajapakse expressed concern
over the partys poor showing at a post mortem on the election
last week. But he brushed aside his first defeat and
dismissed Nanayakkaras comments, blaming the outcome instead
on a lack of support from party organisers.
The UNP claimed the Colombo result as a victory, but it is
nothing of the sort. The UNP-backed independents won only 21 percent
of registered voters and much of this represented a protest against
the UPFA, rather than active support for the UNP. The independents,
headed by Tamil businessman Rajendran, will appoint the mayor
and other officials, but do not have a majority on the 53-seat
council.
Who will actually take the top posts in the Colombo Municipal
Council remains to be seen. As part of the deal for UNP support,
it is believed that the independents agreed to step aside to allow
their seats to be filled by UNP members. The group is nominating
Sirisena Cooray, long-time UNP stalwart, as mayor. Many of the
independents, however, are resisting the UNPs effort to
get them to resign.
Having lost the November presidential election and been decimated
in the first round of local elections, the UNP is clinging to
the Colombo result as proof that its political fortunes are reviving.
It also won the municipal council in Gampaha, a major urban centre
near Colombo, but lost the main southern city of Galle to the
UPFA. The UPFA and UNP each won three relatively minor councils
in rural areas.
Significantly, the governments Sinhala chauvinist ally,
the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP), failed to win any councils.
In the March round, it won just one. The JVP, which is based on
a mixture of communal politics and rural populism, has been agitating
for war against the LTTE. In Colombo, its vote slumped by one
third compared to the 2002 poll. It received 24 percent of the
valid votes cast in Gampaha but just 6.6 percent in Galle, which
is regarded as part of the JVPs southern stronghold.
Rajapakses other communal allythe right-wing Jathika
Hela Urumaya (JHU)fared just as badly, receiving 3,281 votes
in Colombo, 986 in Gampaha and 353 in Galle. The Colombo result
is significant as the JHU, which has close connections to the
Buddhist hierarchy, the military and state apparatus, has previously
polled higher in the capital. Its only substantial votes were
in the rural areas Gampola and Pathahewaheata where many UPFA
supporters voted for the JHU after the UPFA lists were rejected.
The results of the local elections reveal in a distorted fashion
deep discontent over the UPFA governments ongoing assault
on living standards and fears over the plunge towards war. Far
from reconsidering his policies, Rajapakse, with the backing of
the JVP and JHU, is maintaining its aggressive stance towards
the LTTE. His government is preparing to crack down on any opposition
by enacting a far-reaching Patriotic Act that will impose tough
new media censorship and, for the first time, compulsory military
conscription.
See Also:
Ex-radical stands for Colombo
mayor on ticket of Sri Lankan ruling coalition
[29 March 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |