|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Spain
Right-wing Popular Party attacks Spains leading judge
By Daniel OFlynn and Vicky Short
9 November 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
A campaign has been mounted by the right-wing opposition Spanish
Popular Party (PP) against the leading judge, Baltasar Garzón.
The attacks on Garzón started after he alleged in early
October that three police forensic experts, Manuel Escribano,
Pedro Manrique and Isabel Lopez, dishonestly signed and changed
the date of a report in order to suggest that new evidence had
emerged linking the Basque separatist group ETA to the March 11,
2004, train bombing in Madrid, which killed 191 people and injured
1,900 others. The officers superiors had already rejected
the report in 2005 because it was based on flimsy evidence.
The report was promoted in El Mundo, a newspaper close
to the PP, which has taken a leading role in the right-wing campaign
to destabilise the Socialist Party (PSOE) government. It claimed
an Islamist suspect arrested in December 2004 in connection with
the Madrid bombings must have received the same training as an
ETA commander whose apartment was raided in Salamanca in 2001
because police had found the chemical boric acid (a constituent
in the explosive Amonal used by ETA) in their homes. The evidence
was thrown out because boric acid is used in many products such
as antiseptics and insecticides that can be found in most households.
The PPs obsession with proving a connection between the
Madrid bombings and ETA is linked with the PSOEs election
to power three days after the bombings. The PSOE was the undeserving
beneficiary of the massive opposition to the PP governments
support for the war in Iraq and its anti-working class social
policies. Aware that millions would correctly blame the PPs
participation in the war for creating the conditions for an atrocity
perpetrated by Islamic fundamentalists, the PP sought to blame
ETA for the outrage. This backfired as evidence of Al Qaeda involvement
came to light and became the focus for seething opposition to
the PP. Ever since, the PP has refused to recognise the election
results and describes the PSOE as an illegitimate government,
with the support of the right-wing media, sections of the military
and the Catholic Church.
Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary and an official
investigation that ended in the jailing of scores of Arabs and
the indictment of 29 Islamist extremists and their collaborators,
the PP has pressed ahead with its campaignadvancing a claim
of collusion between ETA and Al Qaeda.
In the face of what he described as systematic and unjustified
attacks for doing his job, Garzón requested support
and formal reaffirmation of his work from the 20-member General
Council of the Judiciary (Consejo General del Poder Judicial,
CGPJ)the body that represents and gives guidance to all
judges. The refusal of the CGPJ to defend Garzónby
a majority vote that split down party political linesleft
Spains most famous magistrate exposed to further attacks
from the PP and the right-wing media over his decision to charge
the three police officers with fraud.
The PP majority said that they would not support Garzón
until they carried out their own investigationnot into the
alleged wrongdoings by the police, but into whether Garzón
had acted appropriately by investigating the fraud
charges. Judge José Luis Requero has been called upon as
a member of the CGPJ to scrutinise Garzóns investigation.
He is a well-known supporter of the PP, who has described homosexual
marriage as a union between a man and an animal.
The PPs readiness to break with even the pretence of
impartiality of Spains equivalent of the US Supreme Courtand
to wage a campaign in defence of government officials who are
guilty of fraudillustrates how sharp political and social
tensions have become. Moreover to vilify Garzón, a well-known
international figure and a stalwart defender of the Spanish bourgeois
state, is no small matter.
He is despised by the right-wing in part for having secured
the detention of former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet while
he was in London for a medical check-up in 1998 and attempting
without success to extradite him to Spain to be tried for crimes
against humanity. He later issued arrest warrants for other members
of the junta. His initial rise to prominence in Spain came with
the investigations into the rightist terror group Grupos Antiterroristas
de Liberación (GAL), which bombed and terrorised southwest
France in the 1980s in an attempt to eradicate ETA.
Despite media claims, he is no liberal and certainly not a
peoples judge. In 2002, he introduced a ban
on the Basque political party Herri Batasunathe first time
since Francos death that a political party had been banned
in Spain. He also mediated the closing down of the left-leaning
Basque-language paper Egunkaria. His most recent investigations
have included the September 24, 2003, indictment of 35 Al Qaeda
suspects, including Tayssir Alouni, an Al Jazeera correspondent
in Spain, and Osama bin Laden.
For the judiciary itself to join in a political attack on one
of its own most high-profile representatives could only occur
under conditions of a political civil war that threatens to destabilise
the entire Spanish state apparatus. That is why the PSOE government
is doing everything it can to downplay the significance of such
attacks and limiting itself to an appeal for the CGPJ to remain
impartial.
Such appeals not only fall on deaf ears, but actively encourage
the PP and its far-right supporters to step up attacks that directly
threaten the democratic rights of the working class.
See Also:
Spain: new capitulation by
the Socialist Party to the Catholic Church
[26 October 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |