|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: The
Philippines
Escalating political murders in the Philippines
By Dante Pastrana
17 October 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The death toll of political activists has continued to mount
in the Philippines. On September 20, eleven gunmen, wearing bonnets,
black shirts and combat boots, barged into the backyard of Christopher
Lunar, and shot and killed the peasant leader in broad daylight.
The 31-year-old Lunar, a local coordinator of the party-list
group Anak-Pawis in the Camarines Sur province, was the second
political activist to be assassinated in the Bicol region. On
August 3, Isaias Sta. Rosa, a pastor for the United Methodist
Church and leader of the leftist Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas,
was shot in his own house in the neighboring province of Albay.
According to Philippine Daily Inquirer, Lunas was the
251st leftist victim since President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo took
power in 2001. Karapatan, a local human rights organisation, claims
a higher toll, recording 601 killings. Another 140 activists have
also disappeared. Even worse, human rights organisations
have noted a surge in political murders this year. Amnesty International
reported 51 killings in the first six months alone, compared to
66 for the whole of 2005.
Top government officials insist that the murders are a purge
being conducted by the Maoist Communist Party of the Philippines
(CPP) against its own members. Police authorities deny outright
that any pattern exists, claiming the murders are simply part
of the normal crime-rate cycle. Sometimes it falls, sometimes
it goes up, national police spokesman Samuel Pagdilao told
the press in May.
Of the 110 political killings admitted by the government since
2001, only four cases have been filed in court. This pattern
of impunity finally forced even the official Commission
of Human Rights, an independent constitutional body, to timidly
warn that, while not condemning the Arroyo administration, in
human rights terms, the government is still responsible, even
if persons in authority are not those behind the killings.
However, it is not simply a matter of government indifference.
The rising tide of death is the result of a deliberate and vicious
campaign launched by government security forces, working in tandem
with death squads and vigilantes to intimidate and terrorise a
growing protest movement among the rural poor.
The leftist Bayan Muna party-list group, which in 2001 received
1,203,305 votes and sent three representatives to the Philippine
congress, has been the prime target, with 95 of its local officials
killed. The party-list groups Anak-Pawis and Gabriela, which separately
obtained half a million votes and have a total of three representatives,
have also been targeted. As of March 2006, 23 Anak-Pawis members
and officials had been killed. Gabriela has suffered four fatalities.
The surge of political killings has been accompanied by a crude
campaign by government security forces of red-baitingbranding
all leftist party-list groups and allied rural and other social-civic
organisations as nothing but fronts for the underground
CPP or its armed wing, the New Peoples Army (NPA).
This propaganda campaign, which is similar to the methods used
in the 1970s under the Marcos dictatorship, effectively turns
peasants, trade unionists, church, social and human rights activists
into targets of counter-insurgency operations. According to Amnesty
International, some of the victims were placed, without
opportunity for rebuttal, on AFP [Armed Forces of the Philippines]
Orders of Battle [lists of people wanted for alleged
subversion].
The AFPs open contempt for basic democratic rights is
exemplified by military field commanders like Major General Jovito
Palparan who, according to an Asia Times report, shrugged
off the deaths of leftist activists last year as just small
sacrifices and asserted that the extra-judicial
killings helped the military in its counter-insurgency campaigns.
Justice Secretary Raul Gonzalez has expressed the same sentiments.
According to the Philippine Star, he told the five leftist
party-list representatives accused of rebellion during the state
of emergency in March to go back to the mountains where
you belongthat is, to the NPAs guerrilla camps.
Not to be outdone, national security adviser Norberto Gonzalez
accused Bayan Muna members of moonlighting as NPA
guerillas and their party-list representatives of funding the
CPP with their congressional pork barrels.
President Arroyo, while less blatant, obviously supports the
campaign. In her July 26 state of the union address, she condemned
political killings in the harshest possible terms
but then heaped praise on Major General Palparan for not backing
down against rebels, who kill without qualms, even
their own. Palparan has been branded the butcher
by various human rights organisations for his alleged connections
to more than 500 cases of human rights violations since 2003.
Official inquiries
Amid growing public outrage over the political murders, Arroyo
has established two supposedly independent bodies to conduct inquiries.
Task Force Usig (or Prosecute) is a case of the suspects investigating
themselves. It is a special police unit headed by the deputy general
of the national police. Its report released during Arroyos
visit to Europe early in September proclaimed the government was
not responsible for any abuses that might have taken place.
The task force found that of 36 killings investigated, the Maoists
allegedly committed 16 and the military just sixconveniently
justifying the government line that the CPP was conducting a purge.
The second body is the so-called Melo commission. It is named
after its chair, former Supreme Court justice Jose Melo, who began
his career as an appointee of President Diosdado Macapagal, Arroyos
father. The commission has the narrow remit of investigating the
root causes and recommending policies to end the bloodshed,
according to a presidential spokesperson.
Its independence is highly questionable. The commissions
budget of $20,000 was traced to the presidents office, after
it was revealed that the government had allocated no funding.
Additional funds are to come from the National Bureau of Investigation,
the Philippine National Police and the AFP, but only if the agencies
themselves agree.
The Arroyo administration rejected a suggestion by Amnesty
International to expand the commission to include human rights
organisations. The body is mainly composed of government officialsthe
director of the National Bureau of Investigation, the chief state
prosecutor and a regent of the University of the Philippines.
Its only non-government membera Catholic archbishoprefused
to join, saying his membership would compromise the independence
of the Roman Catholic Church.
It is not just political activists who are being murdered.
Amnesty International has drawn attention to a surge of extra-judicial
killings of suspected petty criminals, particularly in two major
cities whose mayors are close allies of Arroyo.
In Cebu city, at least 162 suspected petty criminals have been
reported killed since December 2004. The Sun Star Daily
reported the mayor as saying: To me, as long as there are
fewer robberies and [bag] snatching, its not so bad.
In Davao city, 390 suspected criminals, again mostly petty thieves,
including street children and youth gang members, have been murdered
since 2001. The mayor told the Washington Post: Ive
been telling criminals its a place where you can die any
time. If thats a cue for anybody, thats fine.
Many unsolved killings of journalists have also occurred in
the Philippines. According to Amnesty International, 79 journalists
have been killed since 1986, with 42 deaths since Arroyo assumed
power in 2001. Nine have already died in the first seven months
of 2006.
The ruthless murder of political opponents is an attempt to
suppress the growing popular hostility and opposition to the Arroyo
administration. Arroyo was installed in power in 2001 in what
amounted to a constitutional coup. A protracted campaign to oust
elected President Joseph Estrada through formal impeachment on
corruption charges failed. With the backing of the military and
sections of the corporate elite, Arroyo was inserted as president
with the sanction of the Supreme Court amid a series of so-called
peoples power rallies.
Having come to power, Arroyo, who repeatedly declared herself
for the poor, immediately launched into her agenda
of far-reaching market reformsincluding privatisations,
regressive taxation and government spending cutbacks. She won
the 2004 presidential election amid allegations of ballot corruption
and has faced two campaigns to impeach her in 2005 and 2006. Arroyos
response to her growing unpopularity has been to turn even further
to the right. She is a fervent supporter of the Bush administrations
bogus war on terrorism, has relaunched military operations
against the NPA and backs tough law and order measures.
The CCP and other leftist partiesmostly CPP breakawaysbear
a heavy political responsibility for helping Arroyo come to power.
In 2001, they joined the peoples power bandwagon,
demanded the ousting of Estrada and supported Arroyo as the alternative.
Their political backing was crucial in duping ordinary working
people into believing that Arroyo, a scion of the Philippine establishment,
would in some way address their burning social needs. Once in
office, Arroyo rapidly turned on her left backers as she implemented
her regressive policies and cracked down on any opposition.
See Also:
Philippines president orders
offensive against Maoist guerrilla army
[19 July 2006]
Renewed efforts to impeach
Philippines president
[14 July 2006]
Political tensions continue
after Philippine state of emergency ends
[13 March 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |