|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Sri
Lanka
Sri Lankas state-owned television censors drama series
By Panini Wijesiriwardane
24 October 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Censorship of filmmakers, artists and writers is escalating
in Sri Lanka in line with the Rajapakse governments intensification
of its war against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).
In a recent case, the Sri Lanka Ruphavanini Corporation (SLRC),
the islands state-funded television channel, cut dialogue
from the weekly teledrama Sudu Kapuru Pethi (White Camphor)
early last month and a few days later axed the series entirely,
claiming it disgraced the military.
The then SLRC chairman Newton Gunaratne told the media the
television show had insulted the security forces. Some parts
of this teledrama bring disgrace to these soldiers and their self-respect,
he claimed. Gunaratne, however, made no attempt to substantiate
his claims.
In fact, the multi-episode drama directed by Athula Pieris
and funded by the broadcaster is a love story involving a Sinhalese
girl from Sri Lankas south and a Tamil boy from the north.
Based on Thushari Abesekeras award-winning novel of the
same name, the teledrama is set during the islands protracted
civil war prior to the 2002 ceasefire. The drama was initiated
following the 2004 Boxing Bay tsunami and promoted by the SLRC
as part of the networks attempts to present a new
vision of peace.
While Sudu Kapuru Pethi is not an explicit antiwar drama,
it is a humane work. Its central love story between Tamil and
Sinhalese youth is anathema to the Sinhala communalists, who dominate
the Sri Lankan state, including the army. Its censorship follows
a pattern of increasingly serious attacks on artists, filmmakers
and journalists who reject Sinhala racism or dare to raise questions
about the governments war drive.
Last year Rear Admiral Sarath Weerasekera published a comment
in the Sunday Times denouncing local filmmakersAsoka
Handagama, Vimukthi Jayasundera, Prasanna Vithanage and Sudath
Mahadiwulvewafor making antiwar movies. He claimed these
films aided terrorism and were tantamount to treason.
A few days later Weerasekera, accompanied by Brigadier Daya
Ratanayke, met with several filmmakers, including Handagama and
Mahadiwulvewa, and said those who failed to produce pro-military
movies when war resumed against the LTTE would face the
consequences. The consequences were soon made
clear.
In March, Culture Minister Mahinda Yapa Abeywardana suddenly
banned Asoka Handagamas Aksharaya even though the
film was not about the civil war. It had been already approved
by Sri Lankas censorship body, the Public Performance Board
(PPB) and cleared for local release.
Handagamas movie was denounced as a foreign-inspired
attack on Sri Lankan moral values. State authorities threatened
criminal charges against the director, claiming he had violated
the countrys child protection laws.
Last months axing of Sudu Kapuru Pethi was equally
arrogant and provocative. SLRC management did not even bother
to tell director Athula Pieris that dialogue had been cut from
his show. He only learnt about it during the broadcast of its
tenth episode on September 3.
When Pieris protested this violation, management suggested
he re-edit the entire program. He refused and the show, which
had another 13 episodes to run, was summarily cancelled.
Pieris is a well-known local television director whose Sindu
kiyana Una Pandura (Singing Bamboo Bush) won Sri Lankas
best single episode teledrama prize in 2005. He told the World
Socialist Web Site the SLRC invested some 4.7 million rupees
in the production, which had been initiated under the previous
Kumaratunga government. The Rajapakse government approved its
script in late 2005.
After broadcasting 10 weekly episodes the SLRC stopped
my teledrama without providing any acceptable reason. Without
my knowledge they censored the dialogueJaffna tears
are as cold as tears in Hambantota [Rajapakses electorate]in
the tenth episode and then telecast it, he said.
Pieriss ability to legally challenge the axing of his
production is limited because he is an SLRC employee and does
not own the rights to the teledrama. But he is determined to fight
this attack on artistic freedom.
I condemn any sort of censorship, let alone state-sponsored
censorship, which effects the creators and the viewers
freedom, he continued. This is what happened with
the recent banning of the local film Aksharaya (A Letter of
Fire).
The government and their supporters want to encourage
a war mentality in this country. My drama attempts to discuss
the real situation here and thats why they censored some
scenes.
The cancellation of Sudu Kapuru Pethi foreshadows further
assaults on democratic rights. As it widens its deeply unpopular
war, the Rajapakse government is determined to silence any opposition.
In this case, the suggestion that ordinary Tamils and Sinhalese
share common problems and concerns was enough to provoke the ire
of those who are deliberately stoking communal hatreds.
See Also:
A socialist program to end the war in
Sri Lanka
[21 October 2006]
A sign of crisis: two major Sri Lankan
parties to form a grand coalition
[18 October 2006]
Sri Lankan defence authorities impose
unofficial censorship
[11 October 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |