|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
Sordid deals as Australian parliamentary parties pick their
candidates
By Richard Phillips
27 September 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
With elections due early next year in New South Wales (NSW),
Australias most populous state, currently governed by the
Labor Party, the past weeks have seen a series of sleazy preselection
deals as Liberal and Labor pick their local candidates. While
political arm-twisting and anti-democratic manoeuvring are no
surprise to those familiar with the so-called preselection process,
this months events have plumbed new lows.
The Liberal and Labor parties could once claim tens of thousands
of active members. Today they are empty shells, kept afloat by
corporate media support and millions of dollars in taxpayer-funded
electoral financing. Where local branches exist they are either
stacked with cronies of the party leadership or rival bureaucratic
aspirants. Any semblance of local membership selection of parliamentary
candidates is only tolerated if it coincides with the immediate
political needs of the state and federal branch apparatchiks.
This month, for example, NSW Labor premier Morris Iemma and
the state leadership imposed candidates on six local branches,
as well as intervening to prevent rank-and-file members from disendorsing
two officially favoured sitting MPs. Those protected were unpopular
state parliamentarians Angela DAmore and Planning Minister
Frank Sartor, who would have been dumped if local ALPers had been
allowed to participate in a preselection vote.
New candidates selected without branch votes were Nathan Reece,
an unknown bureaucrat who works in Iemmas office, and Parramatta
Lord Mayor David Borger, who was appointed to replace retiring
MP Kim Yeadon for the seat of Granville. Borger has previously
protested undemocratic preselection deals but on this occasion
cynically declared that he was not interested in discussing them.
He only wanted to talk about the future.
The most blatantly anti-democratic Labor appointments, however,
occurred in Newcastle and Shellharbour, key industrial electorates
in NSW.
Long-standing Newcastle MP Bryce Gaudry was replaced by Jodi
McKay, a former television newsreader and now business consultant.
Gaudry was dumped because he had publicly opposed the state governments
cuts to the local rail service and fought to maintain rank-and-file
voting in all NSW preselection ballots.
In Shellharbour, which is part of Wollongong and home to Australias
biggest steel works, Lylea McMahon replaced retiring MP Marianne
Saliba as the local candidate.
Decades ago most Labor MPs were selected on the basis of their
record in the labour movement. McKay and McMahon were tapped on
the shoulder by the ALP state leadership because of their intimate
relations with local business, big and small.
McKay, for example, told the Newcastle media that she had been
seriously considering joining the Liberal Party but decided to
sign up to Labor on August 31, after a discussion with Iemma.
The next day Iemma announced that she would be the local candidate.
As for Shellharbour candidate, Lylea McMahon, she has impeccable
business connections and is a senior human resources
executive for BlueScope Steel, the company spun off from BHP-Billitonone
of Australias largest and most ruthless employers.
The two appointments were made without any consultation or
voting by Labor members in Newcastle or Wollongong, despite the
fact that at the last ALP state conference, a resolution was put
forward demanding that the state leadership stop interfering in
preselections. While narrowly defeated, it was just one of a dozen
similar resolutions.
Determined to crush any challenge, Iemma and his cronies took
the unprecedented step of having their favoured candidates rubber-stamped
by the partys federal executive. This, according to Iemma,
was required to ensure the party had new blood. Local
ALP members in Newcastle and Shellharbour are currently discussing
whether to boycott the forthcoming state election or run independent
candidates.
Arm-twisting in the Liberal camp
Commenting on Labors preselections, Liberal state leader
Peter Debnam claimed that the appointment of candidates by his
organisation was completely different. We dont just
plonk our mates in seats like the ALP, he declared, We
have a democratic process.
Debnams assertions are laughable. Political bullying
inside the Liberal Party is a commonplace and demonstrated by
the frantic manoeouvres carried out over the past weeks to ensure
Pru Goward, a close friend and political ally of Prime Minister
Howard, was given a safe Liberal seat in the NSW parliament.
Finding a place for Goward was an important test for Debnam,
who only became head of the NSW organisation earlier this year
following a scandal orchestrated by Christian fundamentalist and
other extreme-right wing elements to force out former leader John
Brogden. Debnam had to ensure that the partys extreme right
was satisfied while at the same time arranging a seat for Goward
and thus boost his standing with Howard.
Goward, an executive director of the Office of the Status of
Women in the prime ministers department from 1997 to 2001
and currently Federal Sex Discrimination Commissioner, had decided
to contest the north Sydney electorate of Epping.
Her main rival was Greg Smith, a deputy director of public
prosecutions in NSW and former president of the anti-abortion
Right to Life Association. Smith had the overwhelming support
of the Christian right, which not only has the largest voting
bloc in the area, it now, as a result of blatant branch-stacking
and other sordid methods, has immense influence throughout the
NSW party.
Goward was easily defeated at the local preselection vote on
September 16. But even as Smith was being declared the Liberal
candidate for Epping, Debnam announced that Goward would be given
a position in the rural seat of Goulburn.
There was to be no consultation or voting for Goulburns
Liberals. Instead, local Liberal MP Peta Seaton, the current shadow
treasurer and energy minister, suddenly announced she was quitting
her position to make way for Goward. When local lawyer Martin
Laverty declared his long-held intention to run for the seat,
he was summonsed to a high-level meeting with Debnam at state
parliament two days later, and persuaded not to nominate.
Various back-door deals ensured that a slate of Debnams
favoured candidates was pre-selected. These included, rugby league
football executive Graham Annersley, banker Michael Baird, the
son of federal Liberal MP Bruce Baird, and former police inspector
Trish Hitchens.
Last weekend Sharryn Hilton, a real estate agent, was anointed
the Liberal candidate for Picton. The outer southwestern Sydney
electorate had been promised to another Liberal, Jai Rowell, but
Debnam wanted Hilton and so the nomination process was duly reopened.
Predictably, Rowell was persuaded by Debnam to withdraw, and Hilton
was elected unopposed.
Notwithstanding various tactical disagreements and verbal jousting
over which party is toughest on terror, crime and law and
order, there are no significant differences between them.
The ALP currently holds power in Australias six states and
two territories, while Howards Liberal Partyin coalition
with the rural-based National Partyrules federally. The
various Labor and Liberal leaderships work seamlessly together,
in a bipartisan offensive not just against the democratic rights
and basic concerns of their own party memberships, but against
the fundamental interests of the vast majority of the population.
See Also:
Australian government sets course for
militarism and war
[7 September 2006]
Australia: Electoral bill
blocks registration of new parties
A new assault on democratic rights
[21 August 2006]
Australia: state opposition
leader resigns amid media furore
[7 September 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |