|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
Britain: Promotion for police commander involved in de Menezes
shooting
By Paul Mitchell
21 September 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Cressida Dick, the police commander in charge of the shoot-to-kill
operation that led to the death of Jean Charles in London last
year, has been recommended for promotion to deputy assistant commissioner,
one of the highest ranks in the capitals Metropolitan Police
service.
De Menezes, an innocent young Brazilian, was shot seven times
in the head on a tube train at Stockwell station on July 22, 2005
by an anti-terrorist squad investigating the failed explosions
on Londons transport system the previous day.
His family reacted angrily to the appointment, saying officers
involved in the shooting should be prosecuted, not promoted.
Alex Pereira, a cousin of Jean Charles, said, Cressida Dick
should be facing criminal charges at the Old Bailey, not getting
a big promotion at Scotland Yard. He said the people
in charge were working together to prevent justice being
done and that if Jean Charles was a rich person then it
would have been a bit different.
Another spokesman said the family were absolutely disgusted
and outraged at what is just one more slap in the face. We have
not even seen the beginning let alone the end of the legal process
as to who is culpable and responsible for the death of an innocent
man. How can the Metropolitan Police Authority give the green
light to promote Cressida Dick, someone who is centrally involved
in the court case?
MPA chairman Len Duvall said, Clearly there are some
sensitive and unprecedented circumstances involved. Candidates
were chosen on the basis of their application and ability. The
MPA would not prejudice an officers fair promotion prospects
by making assumptions about future disciplinary action.
Not only has the MPA recommended Dicks appointment, but
reports suggest the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Ian
Blair, who is himself embroiled in the controversy following the
shooting, personally encouraged her to apply and sent in a glowing
reference.
Dicks promotion has been welcomed by Ken Livingstone,
Labours Mayor of London. Giving a woman such a high-ranking
position sent out a powerful positive signal about the development
of the Met as a modern police service, he declared. Lee
Jasper, Livingstones director of equalities and policing
who made a name for himself in the 1990s in the campaigns against
deaths of black people in police custody, said glowingly, She
is a fireflysmall, diminutive and red-hot. She is not into
flamboyant gestures but she is an exceptional officer and a tough
cookie.
The decision to promote Dick is highly political. It underscores
the moves towards ever more authoritarian forms of rule. In elevating
Dick, the police are sending out a clear message of their intention
to ride roughshod over opposition to the draconian repressive
measures brought in under the guise of the war on terror.
From the moment Jean Charles de Menezes was shot a campaign
of lies and cover-up began, claiming that his cold-blooded execution
was an unfortunate accident in an otherwise lawful and necessary
policy.
In the hours following Jean Charles death, police sources
claimed that he had been wearing a heavy overcoat (supposedly
to conceal explosives) and had jumped over the stations
ticket barrier in an attempt to escape from the police. Originally
it was reported he had been stopped outside the station and that
he had been warned before being shot.
Ian Blair declared that Jean Charles was directly linked
to the ongoing and expanding anti-terrorist operation hours
after it was known that police had killed an innocent man. Police
later admitted that Jean Charles was wearing a denim jacket and
had passed through the barrier normally without being stopped.
In fact, he had not shown any suspicious behaviour whatsoever
and had been unaware that he was being followed by plainclothes
officers.
Blair then tried to deny the Independent Police Complaints
Commission (IPCC) access to the crime scene for five days, even
though national law requires an independent investigation.
On September 19, 2005, two months after the killing, the former
Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Lord Stevens, revealed that
Prime Minister Tony Blair and former Home Secretary David Blunkett
knew about the shoot to kill policy three years earlier.
The new policy, known as Operation Kratos, was brought in secretly
without any public debate.
On January 19, 2006, the IPCC submitted a report of its investigation
into 15 police officers to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).
The report is believed to say that Dick wanted de Menezes to be
arrested, but her orders had become unclear and misinterpreted
by officers who shot him instead. There is controversy over whether
or not she issued a key codeword that allowed for a shooting to
proceed. However, it is impossible to confirm the truth because
the IPCC has refused to release the report publicly or even let
the de Menezes family or their lawyers have a copy.
The IPPC also carried out a second investigation, still ongoing,
after a complaint from the de Menezes family about statements
made by the police. And this investigation was started only after
a leak revealed that there were conflicts between police statements,
particularly those of Blair and the IPCC.
On July 17, 2006, the CPS announced it was not going to prosecute
any police officer involved in the shooting ,claiming there
was insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction.
It was impossible, the CPS said, to find out whether or not police
officers thought Jean Charles was a suicide bomber or whether
a log book recording the events had been falsified and by whom.
Instead the CPS announced that it intended to prosecute the
office of the Metropolitan Police Commissioner under the Health
and Safety at Work Act 1974 for failing to provide for the health,
safety and welfare of non-employees.
Commissioner Blair has condemned charges in the case as inappropriate
and the MPA has asked the CPS to reconsider the prosecution, doubting
it was in the public interest to continue.
Shortly before the announcement of Dicks promotion, the
CPS advised the Southwark coroner John Sampson to
adjourn his inquest into the de Menezes death, saying it could
prejudice the health and safety trial. An inquest is one of the
few ways the law allows the family to participate as next-of-kin
to the deceased in an investigation, including access to witness
statements and the right to question them. The familys lawyers
opposed an adjournment, saying the prosecution and inquest were
two entirely separate legal proceedings and that it was unprecedented
for an inquest to be delayed in this way. However, Sampson ignored
the objections and ordered an adjournment.
As a result the inquest is likely to be delayed until at least
2008 and it could be years before it sees the light of day. A
spokesperson for the de Menezes family said, It is appalling
that a year after Jeans killing there has been no public
investigation of the circumstances in which he came to die. It
only serves to fuel suspicion that the authorities do not want
the issues that arose out of Jeans death to come into the
public domain.
The determination to prevent any investigation into how Britains
home-grown death squad was created and how it operates has deep
social and political roots. The Blair government defends the interests
of a financial elite seeking to enrich itself through colonial
plunder and the destruction of the living standards of the working
class. This is the essential reason it has resorted to lawlessness
and criminality.
See Also:
Britain: No one to be held
accountable for police murder of Jean Charles de Menezes
[19 July 2006]
Britain: media defend
state killing, police chief warns more to come
[27 July 2005]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |