|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
Britain: Labour has shifted taxes from rich to poor
By Simon Whelan
25 September 2006
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Research by the free market think tank, the Centre
for Policy Studies (CPS), has revealed how the burden of taxation
has fallen heaviest on the working class and the poor under Prime
Minister Tony Blair.
The CPS research shows that the poorest households in Britain
are now paying a higher share of taxes and simultaneously receiving
a lower share of state benefits than before Labour took power
in 1997. It finds that if the poorest fifth of British households
paid the same share of total taxes and received the same share
of total state benefits as they did in 1996-7, they would be at
least £500 better off.
For a significant section of the population, making ends meet
is an unending struggle. Charles Elphicke is a tax partner in
a leading international law firm and author of the CPS study,
entitled Robin Hood or Sheriff of Nottingham?: Winners and
Losers from Tax and Benefit Reform Over the Last Ten Years.
He states, Almost five million households have an average
pre-tax and benefit income of just £4,280.
The extra taxation levied on the poorest fifth of British households
since Blair came to power amounts to £56 per household.
The total amount of benefit lost amounts to a further £475
for that section of society least able to afford it.
In the immediate post-war period the central tenet of Labours
reformist programme was a progressively redistributive taxation
system. This has been replaced by one that is regressive and targets
the poor for taxation, both direct and indirect, in order to shift
wealth towards the super-rich. That Chancellor Gordon Brown has
been the key architect of this punitive system explodes the efforts
to promote him as Blairs successor based on the claim that
he is more traditionally social democratic.
Elphicke reveals how the poorest five million British households
pay at least £1,000 in income and council tax on their meagre
incomes. The poorest fifth of British households accounted for
6.9 percent of all taxes paid in the financial year 2004/2005the
last tax year for which detailed figures are available. When Labour
came to power in 1997 the tax burden upon the poorest fifth of
families was 6.8 percent. During the same period the share of
state benefits payouts to the poorest Britons dropped from 28.1
percent to todays figure of 27.1 percent.
The second poorest fifth of British society have fared little
better. The average income of this section of working class households
is just £11,000less than half the so-called average
wage. This section of the working class, comprising semi-skilled
workers and service sector employees, pay 10.1 percent of the
nations taxes, whilst their share of benefits has fallen
from 26.2 percent to 25.2 percenta loss of £427 per
household. This is a staggering situation, with 40 percent of
the population earning less than £11,000 and half earning
less than £22,000.
The CPS is a pro-Tory body established by Margaret Thatcher
and Sir Keith Joseph in 1974 to assist in the Conservative Partys
policy of rolling back the welfare state. It is seeking to make
hay at Labours expense, but is no means advocating a return
to wealth redistribution.
On the contrary, the most privileged social layers are demanding
that their own tax burden be further reduced. The highly paid
journalists on the Times and Telegraph newspapers,
for example, are promoting the fiction that the upper-middle-classes
are paying above the rate of inflation on things like private
school fees, council tax and energy costs. The super rich are
also being unfairly penalised, they claim, because they spend
more on luxury items like sports cars, mansions and other items
whose prices are rising fastest.
Their arguments are based on the claim that the government
has shifted from a retail price index (RPI) to a consumer price
index (CPI) to measure inflation and set its tax and benefit levels.
This excludes house prices, school fees, utility bills and such
vital necessities as household servants, they complain.
Indicative of the type of bile directed against the working
class is an article by Telegraph journalist and media adviser
to the Conservative Party, George Trefgarne. He wrote, So,
if you are young and, say, wear tracksuits, live on benefits in
a council house, scoff processed food and play computer games,
inflation has indeed been non-existent in the past few years.
But for middle-class people, who, yes, drink freshly squeezed
OJ, and who buy their home and who pay school fees and, of course,
taxesor for older people who require expensive residential
careprices have been shooting up. Perhaps the CPI should
stand for the Chav Price Index.
In reality, the CPI does include house prices, utilities, school
fees and servant costs and will also include university fees come
the autumn. And whereas the government has switched to the CPI
for calculations on inflation, it in fact still utilises the RPI
when calculating taxes, benefits and pensions. The RPI includes
luxury goods like champagne and private education fees, but these
have actually risen at a slower rate than essentials like fuel
and housing costs.
According to research carried out by John Hawksworth, chief
economist at PricewaterhouseCoopers, it is the poorest section
of the working class who have suffered most from the 29 percent
increase in energy prices over the last year. This has disproportionately
impacted on the poorest third of British households, which spend
a greater proportion of their income on energy than the better-off.
Hawksworth has estimated the inflation rate suffered by ten
income groups into which he divides the British population based
on how they spend their money. Higher energy bills are the reason
why since 2005 inflation has become more pronounced for the lowest
four of his income groups. The poorest two deciles of British
society actually pay higher rates of taxation than the richest
30 percent, mainly due to the proportion of the budgets of poorer
families taken up by energy bills and, to a lesser extent, food
costs.
See Also:
Britain: More indicators of
inequality
[31 August 2006]
Debt and social misery: the
flipside of Britains financial services boom
[12 June 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |