|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Middle
East : Turkey
A damning report on attacks against free speech in Turkey
By our correspondent
3 April 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
On March 26, the Freedom to Publish Committee of the Turkish
Publishers Union issued an alarming report on the state
of free speech in Turkey. The report lists the large number of
book confiscations and prosecutions of writers, editors and translators
tried and sentenced in 2006 and the first quarter of 2007. The
report is dedicated to the memory of Hrant Dink, a well-known
Turkish-Armenian journalist who was killed by a 17-year-old fascist
assassin on January 19 in Istanbul in front of his papers
(bilingual Turkish-Armenian weekly Agos) office.
The report paints a grim picture of the state of free speech
in Turkey and provides a full and detailed list of those who have
been taken to court for their speeches, writings, published articles,
and even their translations.
The very first line of the report points out that the year
2006 was one of the worst in terms of freedom of speech and freedom
of the press, and the same problems persist in 2007. The report
warns that continuing attacks on freedom of speech have been accompanied
by physical violence, which reached its climax with the heinous
murder of Hrant Dink.
The authors of the report are not optimistic about the rest
of 2007. They point out that with the beginning of the New Year
in January, author Taner Akcam and journalist Aydin Engin were
brought to court, and even the funeral of Hrant Dink was the subject
of a court case. At the same time, the government has been resisting
the calls for the removal of obstacles to free expression, most
notably the notorious Article 301. In the reports own words,
Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code was the champion of
the year.
According to the report, in 2006, some 293 writers, publishers,
journalists, intellectuals, translators and human rights activists
were brought before courts. In 2005, this figure was 157. At the
moment, 22 dissident journalists and editors are behind bars.
The report also notes that in 2006, 41 authors and 22 publishers
were put on trail because of the 44 books they had written or
published. Last year, prosecution of 13 of these crimes
ended in convictions, while 16 cases are still being tried. The
total number of such cases was almost the same in 2005.
The report emphasises that another negative feature of 2006
was the fact that criminal proceedings were brought by prosecutors
against translators in addition to authors and publishers. For
example, last year, Lutfi Taylan Tosun and Aysel Yildirim, the
two translators of US writer John Tirmans Spoils of War:
The Human Cost of Americas Arms Trade, were brought
before a court. Claude Edelmann of Amnesty International called
the case unprecedented.
Cases involving renowned intellectuals, such as Nobel Literature
Prize winner Orhan Pamuk, Elif Safak, Ipek Calislar Ibrahim Kabaoglu,
and Baskin Oran, have received some coverage by the mainstream
media, and their cases ended in acquittal. However, the plight
of victims of many more lesser-known prosecutions went unnoticed,
and they were not so lucky.
At the end of the report, there is a full list of books either
banned or subjected to court cases. It is clear that books focusing
on the Kurdish question are still the main target. However, for
the last few years, books about minorities in Turkey (the Kemalist
establishment strictly refers to non-Muslim religious minorities
such as Greeks, Jews and Armenians as minorities) are also being
targeted more and more frequently.
This is a direct result of an ongoing anti-minority campaign
initiated by far-right and fascistic forces, as well as by the
notorious Maoist/Kemalist Workers Party (IP), supported by the
Confederation of Turkish Trade Unions (Turk-Is). These organisations
oppose in particular Turkish accession to the European Union.
Left-wing components of this criminal campaign present
it as an anti-imperialist struggle against the EU.
In reality, such campaigns have paved the way for the wave of
nationalism and chauvinism spearheaded by the Turkish military
that has terrorised the country for the last few years.
Particularly since the September 1980 military coup, the Turkish
police and the justice system have been dominated by the far right,
fascists and Islamists, and the personal tendencies of the jurists
play an important role in this respect.
The wave of nationalism and chauvinism, which underlies the
apparent rise of attacks on freedom of speech, is a response by
establishment political circles in particular to the implications
of the Iraq war. As a result of the disastrous US-led war and
occupation of Iraq, the country is on the verge of breaking apart,
and the Turkish elite is extremely worried about the possible
consequences of such a development.
In addition, as the election of the new president of the republic
approaches, tensions between the Turkish military and the moderate
Islamist AKP (Justice and Development Party) are growing day by
day. The AKP enjoys a huge parliamentary majority (354 out of
550 seats), and the president will be elected in May 2007 by an
absolute majority of the parliament (in other words, by the AKP)
to a seven-year term. The president has the mandate to shape the
top echelons of the judiciary and the administrative system. If
the AKP persists in electing an Islamist (either the AKP leader
Recep Tayyip Erdogan or another Islamist) to the presidential
post, then the armed forces will intervene in the process, one
way or another.
The civilian supporters of the ongoing military
campaign against the AKP governmentthe most important component
being the Republican Peoples Party (CHP)are employing
nationalist and chauvinist rhetoric and systematically opposing
even an amendment to Article 301, as well as any other reforms
that would enhance minority rights, particularly in relation to
acquiring and retaining property.
The alternative presented by the secularist forces
is a coalition government consisting of the CHP and the fascist
Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) following national elections
due on November 4.
The report of the Turkish Publishers Union mentions the
stagnation of the accession talks with the EU as the main reason
for the grievous state of free speech in Turkey, and there is
a grain of truth in this claim. The almost open rejection of Turkey
by the EU has indeed strengthened right-wing, fascistic and nationalist
forces in Turkey, especially in the state apparatus. But one should
not confuse cause and effect. It is the EU that pressured Turkey
to adopt market reforms and used the Kurdish question as a means
of pressure. It is the EU where anti-Islamic chauvinism in both
right-wing and left-wing forms is fostered, leading
to Turkeys exclusion.
US imperialism is the most destabilising factor in world politics
today, breaking apart Turkeys neighbour Iraq, while on occasion
openly appealing to the most right-wing and militaristic forces
in the Turkish state. The turn to chauvinism and repression is
the only answer of the Turkish bourgeoisiehistorically weak
as it isto the pressure exerted by European and US imperialism.
In the final analysis, the repressive character of the regime
is a result of the decades-long subordination of Turkey to imperialist
rule, including the major European powers. The present condition
of the country does not stand in contradiction to the Western
world, but is rather the product of it. The global supremacy
of imperialism leaves no room for countries like Turkey, with
a belated capitalist industrial development, to undertake an organic
democratic development.
In Turkey, only an independent socialist political movement
of the working class and other layers of working and oppressed
people, based on a truly international socialist programme, can
build a just and genuine democracy where authors, creative artists,
publishers, and translators can live and work free from repression.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |